Theorem inxpss 37778

Description: Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inxpss	⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem inxpss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brinxp2 5750	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
2	1	imbi1i 349	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
3		impexp 450	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
4	2, 3	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
5	4	2albii 1815	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
6		relinxp 5811	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
7		ssrel3 5783	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
9		r2al 3190	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
10	5, 8, 9	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1532   ∈ wcel 2099  ∀wral 3057   ∩ cin 3944   ⊆ wss 3945   class class class wbr 5143   × cxp 5671  Rel wrel 5678

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5294  ax-nul 5301  ax-pr 5424

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-ral 3058  df-rex 3067  df-rab 3429  df-v 3472  df-dif 3948  df-un 3950  df-in 3952  df-ss 3962  df-nul 4320  df-if 4526  df-sn 4626  df-pr 4628  df-op 4632  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-xp 5679  df-rel 5680

This theorem is referenced by:  idinxpss  37779