Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Peter Mazsa < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  inxpss Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem inxpss 36374
Description: Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inxpss ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem inxpss
StepHypRef Expression
1 brinxp2 5655 . . . . 5 (𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
21imbi1i 349 . . . 4 ((𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ (((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
3 impexp 450 . . . 4 ((((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
42, 3bitri 274 . . 3 ((𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
542albii 1824 . 2 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
6 relinxp 5713 . . 3 Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
7 ssrel3 36361 . . 3 (Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
86, 7ax-mp 5 . 2 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
9 r2al 3124 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
105, 8, 93bitr4i 302 1 ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 205  wa 395  wal 1537  wcel 2108  wral 3063  cin 3882  wss 3883   class class class wbr 5070   × cxp 5578  Rel wrel 5585
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587
This theorem is referenced by:  idinxpss  36375
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator