Theorem inxpss 38684

Description: Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inxpss	⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem inxpss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brinxp2 5696	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
2	1	imbi1i 350	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
3		impexp 451	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
4	2, 3	bitri 276	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
5	4	2albii 1827	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
6		relinxp 5757	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
7		ssrel3 5729	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
9		r2al 3175	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)))
10	5, 8, 9	3bitr4i 304	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1545   ∈ wcel 2119  ∀wral 3053   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883   class class class wbr 5072   × cxp 5616  Rel wrel 5623

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5218  ax-pr 5362

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-br 5073  df-opab 5135  df-xp 5624  df-rel 5625

This theorem is referenced by:  idinxpss  38685