Theorem nffr 5662

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nffr.r	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nffr.a	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nffr	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nffr

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-fr 5641	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏))
2		nfcv 2903	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑎
3		nffr.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfss 3988	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴
5		nfv 1912	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ≠ ∅
6	4, 5	nfan 1897	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
7		nfcv 2903	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑐
8		nffr.r	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
9		nfcv 2903	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑏
10	7, 8, 9	nfbr 5195	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑐𝑅𝑏
11	10	nfn 1855	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
12	2, 11	nfralw 3309	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
13	2, 12	nfrexw 3311	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
14	6, 13	nfim 1894	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
15	14	nfal 2322	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
16	1, 15	nfxfr 1850	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535  Ⅎwnf 1780  Ⅎwnfc 2888   ≠ wne 2938  ∀wral 3059  ∃wrex 3068   ⊆ wss 3963  ∅c0 4339   class class class wbr 5148   Fr wfr 5638

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-br 5149  df-fr 5641

This theorem is referenced by:  nfwe  5664  weiunfr  36450