Theorem nffr 5656

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nffr.r	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nffr.a	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nffr	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nffr

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-fr 5637	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏))
2		nfcv 2892	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑎
3		nffr.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfss 3972	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴
5		nfv 1910	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ≠ ∅
6	4, 5	nfan 1895	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
7		nfcv 2892	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑐
8		nffr.r	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
9		nfcv 2892	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑏
10	7, 8, 9	nfbr 5200	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑐𝑅𝑏
11	10	nfn 1853	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
12	2, 11	nfralw 3299	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
13	2, 12	nfrexw 3301	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
14	6, 13	nfim 1892	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
15	14	nfal 2312	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
16	1, 15	nfxfr 1848	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394  ∀wal 1532  Ⅎwnf 1778  Ⅎwnfc 2876   ≠ wne 2930  ∀wral 3051  ∃wrex 3060   ⊆ wss 3947  ∅c0 4325   class class class wbr 5153   Fr wfr 5634

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2697

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3420  df-v 3464  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4326  df-if 4534  df-sn 4634  df-pr 4636  df-op 4640  df-br 5154  df-fr 5637

This theorem is referenced by:  nfwe  5658