Theorem nffr 5651

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nffr.r	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nffr.a	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nffr	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nffr

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-fr 5632	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏))
2		nfcv 2904	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑎
3		nffr.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfss 3975	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴
5		nfv 1918	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ≠ ∅
6	4, 5	nfan 1903	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
7		nfcv 2904	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑐
8		nffr.r	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
9		nfcv 2904	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑏
10	7, 8, 9	nfbr 5196	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑐𝑅𝑏
11	10	nfn 1861	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
12	2, 11	nfralw 3309	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
13	2, 12	nfrexw 3311	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
14	6, 13	nfim 1900	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
15	14	nfal 2317	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
16	1, 15	nfxfr 1856	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 397  ∀wal 1540  Ⅎwnf 1786  Ⅎwnfc 2884   ≠ wne 2941  ∀wral 3062  ∃wrex 3071   ⊆ wss 3949  ∅c0 4323   class class class wbr 5149   Fr wfr 5629

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-br 5150  df-fr 5632

This theorem is referenced by:  nfwe  5653