Theorem nffr 5614

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nffr.r	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nffr.a	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nffr	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nffr

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-fr 5594	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏))
2		nfcv 2892	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑎
3		nffr.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfss 3942	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴
5		nfv 1914	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑎 ≠ ∅
6	4, 5	nfan 1899	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
7		nfcv 2892	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑐
8		nffr.r	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
9		nfcv 2892	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑏
10	7, 8, 9	nfbr 5157	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑐𝑅𝑏
11	10	nfn 1857	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
12	2, 11	nfralw 3287	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
13	2, 12	nfrexw 3289	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
14	6, 13	nfim 1896	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
15	14	nfal 2322	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
16	1, 15	nfxfr 1853	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538  Ⅎwnf 1783  Ⅎwnfc 2877   ≠ wne 2926  ∀wral 3045  ∃wrex 3054   ⊆ wss 3917  ∅c0 4299   class class class wbr 5110   Fr wfr 5591

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-br 5111  df-fr 5594

This theorem is referenced by:  nfwe  5616  weiunfr  36462