MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  nffr Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem nffr 5658
Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nffr.r 𝑥𝑅
nffr.a 𝑥𝐴
Assertion
Ref Expression
nffr 𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nffr
Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-fr 5637 . 2 (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎𝐴𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏))
2 nfcv 2905 . . . . . 6 𝑥𝑎
3 nffr.a . . . . . 6 𝑥𝐴
42, 3nfss 3976 . . . . 5 𝑥 𝑎𝐴
5 nfv 1914 . . . . 5 𝑥 𝑎 ≠ ∅
64, 5nfan 1899 . . . 4 𝑥(𝑎𝐴𝑎 ≠ ∅)
7 nfcv 2905 . . . . . . . 8 𝑥𝑐
8 nffr.r . . . . . . . 8 𝑥𝑅
9 nfcv 2905 . . . . . . . 8 𝑥𝑏
107, 8, 9nfbr 5190 . . . . . . 7 𝑥 𝑐𝑅𝑏
1110nfn 1857 . . . . . 6 𝑥 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
122, 11nfralw 3311 . . . . 5 𝑥𝑐𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
132, 12nfrexw 3313 . . . 4 𝑥𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏
146, 13nfim 1896 . . 3 𝑥((𝑎𝐴𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
1514nfal 2323 . 2 𝑥𝑎((𝑎𝐴𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑅𝑏)
161, 15nfxfr 1853 1 𝑥 𝑅 Fr 𝐴
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 395  wal 1538  wnf 1783  wnfc 2890  wne 2940  wral 3061  wrex 3070  wss 3951  c0 4333   class class class wbr 5143   Fr wfr 5634
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2892  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-ss 3968  df-nul 4334  df-if 4526  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-br 5144  df-fr 5637
This theorem is referenced by:  nfwe  5660  weiunfr  36468
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator