Theorem notrab 4268

Description: Complementation of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notrab	⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem notrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		difab 4256	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)}
2		difin 4218	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
3		dfrab3 4265	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
4	3	difeq2i 4071	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
5		abid2 2897	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
6	5	difeq1i 4070	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
7	2, 4, 6	3eqtr4i 2793	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
8		df-rab 3413	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)}
9	1, 7, 8	3eqtr4i 2793	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2738  {crab 3412   ∖ cdif 3896   ∩ cin 3898

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-in 3906

This theorem is used by:  rlimrege0  15666  mhpmulcl  22377  ordtcld1  23422  ordtcld2  23423  lhop1lem  26240  rpvmasumlem  27723  finsumvtxdg2ssteplem1  30005  frgrwopreglem3  30794  zarcls  34384  hasheuni  34595  braew  34753  satfv1  35942