Theorem notrab 4269

Description: Complementation of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notrab	⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem notrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		difab 4257	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)}
2		difin 4219	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
3		dfrab3 4266	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
4	3	difeq2i 4070	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
5		abid2 2868	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴
6	5	difeq1i 4069	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
7	2, 4, 6	3eqtr4i 2764	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
8		df-rab 3396	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)}
9	1, 7, 8	3eqtr4i 2764	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  {cab 2709  {crab 3395   ∖ cdif 3894   ∩ cin 3896

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-in 3904

This theorem is referenced by:  rlimrege0  15486  mhpmulcl  22064  ordtcld1  23112  ordtcld2  23113  lhop1lem  25945  rpvmasumlem  27425  finsumvtxdg2ssteplem1  29524  frgrwopreglem3  30294  zarcls  33887  hasheuni  34098  braew  34255  satfv1  35407