Theorem omllaw3 40079

Description: Orthomodular law equivalent. Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml 31861 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
omllaw3.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
omllaw3.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
omllaw3.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
omllaw3.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
omllaw3.z	⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
omllaw3	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))

Proof of Theorem omllaw3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oveq2 7427	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 → (𝑋(join‘𝐾)(𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) = (𝑋(join‘𝐾) 0 ))
2	1	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → (𝑋(join‘𝐾)(𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) = (𝑋(join‘𝐾) 0 ))
3		omlol 40074	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → 𝐾 ∈ OL)
4		omllaw3.b	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
5		eqid 2765	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (join‘𝐾) = (join‘𝐾)
6		omllaw3.z	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
7	4, 5, 6	olj01 40059	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋(join‘𝐾) 0 ) = 𝑋)
8	3, 7	sylan 592	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋(join‘𝐾) 0 ) = 𝑋)
9	8	3adant3 1150	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋(join‘𝐾) 0 ) = 𝑋)
10	9	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → (𝑋(join‘𝐾) 0 ) = 𝑋)
11	2, 10	eqtr2d 2801	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = (𝑋(join‘𝐾)(𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
12	11	adantrl 729	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 )) → 𝑋 = (𝑋(join‘𝐾)(𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
13		omllaw3.l	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
14		omllaw3.m	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
15		omllaw3.o	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
16	4, 13, 5, 14, 15	omllaw 40077	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋(join‘𝐾)(𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
17	16	imp 412	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑌 = (𝑋(join‘𝐾)(𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
18	17	adantrr 730	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 )) → 𝑌 = (𝑋(join‘𝐾)(𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
19	12, 18	eqtr4d 2803	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 )) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
20	19	ex 418	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   class class class wbr 5111  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419  Basecbs 17293  lecple 17341  occoc 17342  joincjn 18391  meetcmee 18392  0.cp0 18501  OLcol 40008  OMLcoml 40009

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-riota 7376  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-proset 18374  df-poset 18393  df-lub 18424  df-glb 18425  df-join 18426  df-meet 18427  df-p0 18503  df-lat 18512  df-oposet 40010  df-ol 40012  df-oml 40013

This theorem is used by:  omlfh1N  40092  atlatmstc  40153