Theorem refrelredund2 39855

Description: The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel2 39730) in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
refrelredund2	⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)

Proof of Theorem refrelredund2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		refrelredund4 39854	. 2 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
2		df-eqvrel 39804	. . . 4 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅 ∧ TrRel 𝑅))
3		3simpa 1166	. . . 4 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅 ∧ TrRel 𝑅) → ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
4	2, 3	sylbi 220	. . 3 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
5	4	redundpim3 39849	. 2 ⊢ ( redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) → redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅))
6	1, 5	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   ⊆ wss 3900   I cid 5550  dom cdm 5656   ↾ cres 5658  Rel wrel 5661   RefRel wrefrel 39324   SymRel wsymrel 39330   TrRel wtrrel 39333   EqvRel weqvrel 39335   redund wredundp 39340

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-pr 5396

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-id 5551  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-refrel 39727  df-symrel 39759  df-eqvrel 39804  df-redundp 39844

This theorem is used by:  refrelredund3  39856