Theorem refrelredund2 39476

Description: The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel2 39351) in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
refrelredund2	⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)

Proof of Theorem refrelredund2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		refrelredund4 39475	. 2 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
2		df-eqvrel 39425	. . . 4 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅 ∧ TrRel 𝑅))
3		3simpa 1166	. . . 4 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅 ∧ TrRel 𝑅) → ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
4	2, 3	sylbi 220	. . 3 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
5	4	redundpim3 39470	. 2 ⊢ ( redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) → redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅))
6	1, 5	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   ⊆ wss 3902   I cid 5553  dom cdm 5659   ↾ cres 5661  Rel wrel 5664   RefRel wrefrel 38945   SymRel wsymrel 38951   TrRel wtrrel 38954   EqvRel weqvrel 38956   redund wredundp 38961

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5402

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-refrel 39348  df-symrel 39380  df-eqvrel 39425  df-redundp 39465

This theorem is used by:  refrelredund3  39477