Theorem refrelredund2 39410

Description: The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel2 39285) in equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
refrelredund2	⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)

Proof of Theorem refrelredund2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		refrelredund4 39409	. 2 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
2		df-eqvrel 39359	. . . 4 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅 ∧ TrRel 𝑅))
3		3simpa 1166	. . . 4 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅 ∧ TrRel 𝑅) → ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
4	2, 3	sylbi 220	. . 3 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
5	4	redundpim3 39404	. 2 ⊢ ( redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) → redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅))
6	1, 5	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, EqvRel 𝑅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   ⊆ wss 3908   I cid 5560  dom cdm 5666   ↾ cres 5668  Rel wrel 5671   RefRel wrefrel 38879   SymRel wsymrel 38885   TrRel wtrrel 38888   EqvRel weqvrel 38890   redund wredundp 38895

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-refrel 39282  df-symrel 39314  df-eqvrel 39359  df-redundp 39399

This theorem is used by:  refrelredund3  39411