Theorem refrelredund4 37808

Description: The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel2 37688) if the relation is symmetric as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
refrelredund4	⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem refrelredund4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpssres 5692	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑅)
2		sstr2 3988	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑅) → (( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅)
4	3	anim1i 613	. . 3 ⊢ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
5		dfrefrel2 37688	. . 3 ⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
6	4, 5	sylibr 233	. 2 ⊢ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → RefRel 𝑅)
7		an12 641	. . 3 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))
8		anandir 673	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ ◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅)))
9		refsymrel2 37740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ ◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
10		dfsymrel2 37722	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
11	10	anbi2i 621	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅)))
12	8, 9, 11	3bitr4i 302	. . . 4 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
13	12	anbi2i 621	. . 3 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))
14	7, 13	bitr4i 277	. 2 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))
15		df-redundp 37798	. 2 ⊢ ( redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → RefRel 𝑅) ∧ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))))
16	6, 14, 15	mpbir2an 707	1 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394   ∩ cin 3946   ⊆ wss 3947   I cid 5572   × cxp 5673  ^◡ccnv 5674  dom cdm 5675  ran crn 5676   ↾ cres 5677  Rel wrel 5680   RefRel wrefrel 37352   SymRel wsymrel 37358   redund wredundp 37368

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5426

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2808  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3431  df-v 3474  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-id 5573  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-dm 5685  df-rn 5686  df-res 5687  df-refrel 37685  df-symrel 37717  df-redundp 37798

This theorem is referenced by:  refrelredund2  37809