Theorem refrelredund4 39349

Description: The naive version of the definition of reflexive relation is redundant with respect to reflexive relation (see dfrefrel2 39225) if the relation is symmetric as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
refrelredund4	⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem refrelredund4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpssres 5680	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑅)
2		sstr2 3945	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑅) → (( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅)
4	3	anim1i 626	. . 3 ⊢ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
5		dfrefrel2 39225	. . 3 ⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
6	4, 5	sylibr 237	. 2 ⊢ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → RefRel 𝑅)
7		an12 657	. . 3 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))
8		anandir 689	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ ◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅)))
9		refsymrel2 39281	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ ◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
10		dfsymrel2 39263	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
11	10	anbi2i 634	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅)))
12	8, 9, 11	3bitr4i 306	. . . 4 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅) ↔ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅))
13	12	anbi2i 634	. . 3 ⊢ (( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))
14	7, 13	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))
15		df-redundp 39339	. 2 ⊢ ( redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → RefRel 𝑅) ∧ (((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)) ↔ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅)))))
16	6, 14, 15	mpbir2an 723	1 ⊢ redund ((( I ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅), RefRel 𝑅, ( RefRel 𝑅 ∧ SymRel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∩ cin 3905   ⊆ wss 3906   I cid 5557   × cxp 5661  ^◡ccnv 5662  dom cdm 5663  ran crn 5664   ↾ cres 5665  Rel wrel 5668   RefRel wrefrel 38819   SymRel wsymrel 38825   redund wredundp 38835

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-pr 5406

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-refrel 39222  df-symrel 39254  df-redundp 39339

This theorem is referenced by:  refrelredund2  39350