Theorem reldisjun 31229

Description: Split a relation into two disjoint parts based on its domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
reldisjun	⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → 𝑅 = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem reldisjun

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reseq2 5918	. . 3 ⊢ (dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) → (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = (𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
2	1	3ad2ant2 1133	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = (𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
3		resdm 5968	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅)
4	3	3ad2ant1 1132	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅)
5		resundi 5937	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵))
6	5	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)))
7	2, 4, 6	3eqtr3d 2784	1 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → 𝑅 = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∪ cun 3896   ∩ cin 3897  ∅c0 4269  dom cdm 5620   ↾ cres 5622  Rel wrel 5625

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5250  ax-pr 5372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2067  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3404  df-v 3443  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4270  df-if 4474  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-br 5093  df-opab 5155  df-xp 5626  df-rel 5627  df-dm 5630  df-res 5632

This theorem is referenced by:  fressupp  31309  cycpmconjslem2  31709