P. 61 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 6001-6100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	resexg 6001	The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	resexd 6002	The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	resex 6003	The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	resindm 6004	When restricting a relation, intersecting with the domain of the relation has no effect. (Contributed by FL, 6-Oct-2008.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵))
Theorem	resdmdfsn 6005	Restricting a relation to its domain without a set is the same as restricting the relation to the universe without this set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ (V ∖ {𝑋})) = (𝑅 ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∖ {𝑋})))
Theorem	reldisjun 6006	Split a relation into two disjoint parts based on its domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → 𝑅 = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵)))
Theorem	relresdm1 6007	Restriction of a disjoint union to the domain of the first term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (dom 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↾ dom 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	resopab 6008*	Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2002.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	iss 6009	A subclass of the identity function is the identity function restricted to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ↾ dom 𝐴))
Theorem	resopab2 6010*	Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)})
Theorem	resmpt 6011*	Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	resmpt3 6012*	Unconditional restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	resmptf 6013	Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	resmptd 6014*	Restriction of the mapping operation, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	dfres2 6015*	Alternate definition of the restriction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}
Theorem	mptss 6016*	Sufficient condition for inclusion among two functions in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	elimampt 6017*	Membership in the image of a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elidinxp 6018*	Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝐶 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩)
Theorem	elidinxpid 6019*	Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩)
Theorem	elrid 6020*	Characterization of the elements of a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩)
Theorem	idinxpres 6021	The intersection of the identity relation with a cartesian product is the restriction of the identity relation to the intersection of the factors. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) Generalize statement from cartesian square (now idinxpresid 6022) to cartesian product. (Revised by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	idinxpresid 6022	The intersection of the identity relation with the cartesian square of a class is the restriction of the identity relation to that class. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	idssxp 6023	A diagonal set as a subset of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	opabresid 6024*	The restricted identity relation expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)}
Theorem	mptresid 6025*	The restricted identity relation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥)
Theorem	dmresi 6026	The domain of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.)
⊢ dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	restidsing 6027	Restriction of the identity to a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 6-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ( I ↾ {𝐴}) = ({𝐴} × {𝐴})
Theorem	iresn0n0 6028	The identity function restricted to a class 𝐴 is empty iff the class 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	imaeq1 6029	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imaeq2 6030	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	imaeq1i 6031	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)
Theorem	imaeq2i 6032	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)
Theorem	imaeq1d 6033	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imaeq2d 6034	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	imaeq12d 6035	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐷))
Theorem	dfima2 6036*	Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐴𝑦}
Theorem	dfima3 6037*	Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴)}
Theorem	elimag 6038*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴))
Theorem	elima 6039*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴)
Theorem	elima2 6040*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥𝐵𝐴))
Theorem	elima3 6041*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nfima 6042	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for image. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵)
Theorem	nfimad 6043	Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 6042. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	imadmrn 6044	The image of the domain of a class is the range of the class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ dom 𝐴) = ran 𝐴
Theorem	imassrn 6045	The image of a class is a subset of its range. Theorem 3.16(xi) of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴
Theorem	mptima 6046*	Image of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	mptimass 6047*	Image of a function in maps-to notation for a subset. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵))
Theorem	imai 6048	Image under the identity relation. Theorem 3.16(viii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
⊢ ( I “ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	rnresi 6049	The range of the restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ran ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	resiima 6050	The image of a restriction of the identity function. (Contributed by FL, 31-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (( I ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ima0 6051	Image of the empty set. Theorem 3.16(ii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ ∅) = ∅
Theorem	0ima 6052	Image under the empty relation. (Contributed by FL, 11-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (∅ “ 𝐴) = ∅
Theorem	csbima12 6053	Move class substitution in and out of the image of a function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 20-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	imadisj 6054	A class whose image under another is empty is disjoint with the other's domain. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	imadisjlnd 6055	Deduction form of one negated side of imadisj 6054. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	cnvimass 6056	A preimage under any class is included in the domain of the class. (Contributed by FL, 29-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴
Theorem	cnvimarndm 6057	The preimage of the range of a class is the domain of the class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (◡𝐴 “ ran 𝐴) = dom 𝐴
Theorem	imasng 6058*	The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦})
Theorem	relimasn 6059*	The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦})
Theorem	elrelimasn 6060	Elementhood in the image of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	elimasng1 6061	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) Revise to use df-br 5111 and to prove elimasn1 6062 from it. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶))
Theorem	elimasn1 6062	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Use df-br 5111 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶)
Theorem	elimasng 6063	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasng1 6061, remove, and relabel elimasng1 6061 to "elimasng".
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elimasn 6064	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasn1 6062, remove, and relabel elimasn1 6062 to "elimasn".
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elimasni 6065	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶)
Theorem	args 6066*	Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6858 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
Theorem	elinisegg 6067	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Put in closed form and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	eliniseg 6068	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. An application is to express initial segments for an order relation. See for example Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	epin 6069	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	epini 6070	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴
Theorem	iniseg 6071*	An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵})
Theorem	inisegn0 6072	Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	dffr3 6073*	Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅))
Theorem	dfse2 6074*	Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V)
Theorem	imass1 6075	Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imass2 6076	Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	ndmima 6077	The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅)
Theorem	relcnv 6078	A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.)
⊢ Rel ◡𝐴
Theorem	relbrcnvg 6079	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5849 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	eliniseg2 6080	Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 6068. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	relbrcnv 6081	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5849 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	relco 6082	A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cotrg 6083*	Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 6086 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6086. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2158. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotrgOLD 6084*	Obsolete version of cotrg 6083 as of 29-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6086. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotrgOLDOLD 6085*	Obsolete version of cotrg 6083 as of 19-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6086. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotr 6086*	Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 6083. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	idrefALT 6087*	Alternate proof of idref 7121 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	cnvsym 6088*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2158. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	cnvsymOLD 6089*	Obsolete version of cnvsym 6088 as of 29-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	cnvsymOLDOLD 6090*	Obsolete version of cnvsym 6088 as of 23-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	intasym 6091*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref 6092*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6251. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref2 6093*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	intirr 6094*	Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	brcodir 6095*	Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	codir 6096*	Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	qfto 6097*	A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	xpidtr 6098	A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	trin2 6099	The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	poirr2 6100	A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅)