P. 61 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 6001-6100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elimasngOLD 6001	Obsolete version of elimasng 5999 as of 16-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elimasni 6002	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶)
Theorem	args 6003*	Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6780 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
Theorem	elinisegg 6004	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Put in closed form and shorten. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	eliniseg 6005	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. An application is to express initial segments for an order relation. See for example Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	epin 6006	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	epini 6007	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴
Theorem	iniseg 6008*	An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵})
Theorem	inisegn0 6009	Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	dffr3 6010*	Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅))
Theorem	dfse2 6011*	Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V)
Theorem	imass1 6012	Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imass2 6013	Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	ndmima 6014	The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅)
Theorem	relcnv 6015	A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.)
⊢ Rel ◡𝐴
Theorem	relbrcnvg 6016	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5794 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	eliniseg2 6017	Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 6005. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	relbrcnv 6018	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5794 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	relco 6019	A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cotrg 6020*	Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 6022 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6022. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotrgOLD 6021*	Obsolete version of cotrg 6020 as of 19-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6022. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotr 6022*	Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 6020. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	idrefALT 6023*	Alternate proof of idref 7027 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	cnvsym 6024*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	intasym 6025*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref 6026*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6182. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref2 6027*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	intirr 6028*	Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	brcodir 6029*	Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	codir 6030*	Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	qfto 6031*	A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	xpidtr 6032	A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	trin2 6033	The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	poirr2 6034	A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅)
Theorem	trinxp 6035	The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	soirri 6036	A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴
Theorem	sotri 6037	A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	son2lpi 6038	A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	sotri2 6039	A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	sotri3 6040	A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	poleloe 6041	Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	poltletr 6042	Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	somin1 6043	Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴)
Theorem	somincom 6044	Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴))
Theorem	somin2 6045	Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵)
Theorem	soltmin 6046	Being less than a minimum, for a general total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	cnvopab 6047*	The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	mptcnv 6048*	The converse of a mapping function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷))
Theorem	cnv0 6049	The converse of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1998.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5224, ax-nul 5231, ax-pr 5353. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ◡∅ = ∅
Theorem	cnvi 6050	The converse of the identity relation. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡ I = I
Theorem	cnvun 6051	The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∪ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnvdif 6052	Distributive law for converse over class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∖ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnvin 6053	Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∩ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	rnun 6054	Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵)
Theorem	rnin 6055	The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵)
Theorem	rniun 6056	The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ ran ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝐵
Theorem	rnuni 6057*	The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ ran ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥
Theorem	imaundi 6058	Distributive law for image over union. Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imaundir 6059	The image of a union. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Feb-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	cnvimassrndm 6060	The preimage of a superset of the range of a class is the domain of the class. Generalization of cnvimarndm 5993 for subsets. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) = dom 𝐹)
Theorem	dminss 6061	An upper bound for intersection with a domain. Theorem 40 of [Suppes] p. 66, who calls it "somewhat surprising". (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (dom 𝑅 ∩ 𝐴) ⊆ (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐴))
Theorem	imainss 6062	An upper bound for intersection with an image. Theorem 41 of [Suppes] p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	inimass 6063	The image of an intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) ⊆ ((𝐴 “ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	inimasn 6064	The intersection of the image of singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) “ {𝐶}) = ((𝐴 “ {𝐶}) ∩ (𝐵 “ {𝐶})))
Theorem	cnvxp 6065	The converse of a Cartesian product. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐵 × 𝐴)
Theorem	xp0 6066	The Cartesian product with the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.13(ii) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 × ∅) = ∅
Theorem	xpnz 6067	The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is nonempty. (Variation of a theorem contributed by Raph Levien, 30-Jun-2006.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	xpeq0 6068	At least one member of an empty Cartesian product is empty. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅))
Theorem	xpdisj1 6069	Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐷)) = ∅)
Theorem	xpdisj2 6070	Cartesian products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 × 𝐵)) = ∅)
Theorem	xpsndisj 6071	Cartesian products with two different singletons are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∩ (𝐶 × {𝐷})) = ∅)
Theorem	difxp 6072	Difference of Cartesian products, expressed in terms of a union of Cartesian products of differences. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (((𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) × 𝐷) ∪ (𝐶 × (𝐷 ∖ 𝐵)))
Theorem	difxp1 6073	Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) × 𝐶) = ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	difxp2 6074	Difference law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 × (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ (𝐴 × 𝐶))
Theorem	djudisj 6075*	Disjoint unions with disjoint index sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐶) ∩ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ({𝑦} × 𝐷)) = ∅)
Theorem	xpdifid 6076*	The set of distinct couples in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥})) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∖ I )
Theorem	resdisj 6077	A double restriction to disjoint classes is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ → ((𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	rnxp 6078	The range of a Cartesian product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	dmxpss 6079	The domain of a Cartesian product is included in its first factor. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2007.)
⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	rnxpss 6080	The range of a Cartesian product is included in its second factor. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	rnxpid 6081	The range of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	ssxpb 6082	A Cartesian product subclass relationship is equivalent to the conjunction of the analogous relationships for the factors. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷)))
Theorem	xp11 6083	The Cartesian product of nonempty classes is a one-to-one "function" of its two "arguments". In other words, two Cartesian products, at least one with nonempty factors, are equal if and only if their respective factors are equal. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐶 × 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	xpcan 6084	Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	xpcan2 6085	Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐶) = (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ssrnres 6086	Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product): the LHS expresses inclusion in the range of the restricted relation, while the RHS expresses equality with the range of the restricted and corestricted relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ran (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	rninxp 6087*	Two ways to express surjectivity of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (ran (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝐶𝑦)
Theorem	dminxp 6088*	Two ways to express totality of a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (dom (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐶𝑦)
Theorem	imainrect 6089	Image by a restricted and corestricted binary relation (intersection of a binary relation with a Cartesian product). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) “ 𝑌) = ((𝐺 “ (𝑌 ∩ 𝐴)) ∩ 𝐵)
Theorem	xpima 6090	Direct image by a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = if((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅, ∅, 𝐵)
Theorem	xpima1 6091	Direct image by a Cartesian product (case of empty intersection with the domain). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ∅)
Theorem	xpima2 6092	Direct image by a Cartesian product (case of nonempty intersection with the domain). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = 𝐵)
Theorem	xpimasn 6093	Direct image of a singleton by a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) “ {𝑋}) = 𝐵)
Theorem	sossfld 6094	The base set of a strict order is contained in the field of the relation, except possibly for one element (note that ∅ Or {𝐵}). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
Theorem	sofld 6095	The base set of a nonempty strict order is the same as the field of the relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
Theorem	cnvcnv3 6096*	The set of all ordered pairs in a class is the same as the double converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ◡◡𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
Theorem	dfrel2 6097	Alternate definition of relation. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ ◡◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
Theorem	dfrel4v 6098*	A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it. An analogue of dffn5 6837 for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
Theorem	dfrel4 6099*	A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it. An analogue of dffn5 6837 for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
Theorem	cnvcnv 6100	The double converse of a class strips out all elements that are not ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ◡◡𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ (V × V))