| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 61 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31005) |
(31006-32528) |
(32529-50158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | resopab 6001* | Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | ||
| Theorem | iss 6002 | A subclass of the identity function is the identity function restricted to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ↾ dom 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | resopab2 6003* | Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | resmpt 6004* | Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resmpt3 6005* | Unconditional restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resmptf 6006 | Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resmptd 6007* | Restriction of the mapping operation, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dfres2 6008* | Alternate definition of the restriction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)} | ||
| Theorem | mptss 6009* | Sufficient condition for inclusion among two functions in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elimampt 6010* | Membership in the image of a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elidinxp 6011* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝐶 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | elidinxpid 6012* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | elrid 6013* | Characterization of the elements of a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | idinxpres 6014 | The intersection of the identity relation with a cartesian product is the restriction of the identity relation to the intersection of the factors. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) Generalize statement from cartesian square (now idinxpresid 6015) to cartesian product. (Revised by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idinxpresid 6015 | The intersection of the identity relation with the cartesian square of a class is the restriction of the identity relation to that class. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | idssxp 6016 | A diagonal set as a subset of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | opabresid 6017* | The restricted identity relation expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)} | ||
| Theorem | mptresid 6018* | The restricted identity relation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | dmresi 6019 | The domain of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | restidsing 6020 | Restriction of the identity to a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 6-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ {𝐴}) = ({𝐴} × {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | iresn0n0 6021 | The identity function restricted to a class 𝐴 is empty iff the class 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1 6022 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2 6023 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1i 6024 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2i 6025 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1d 6026 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2d 6027 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq12d 6028 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | dfima2 6029* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfima3 6030* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴)} | ||
| Theorem | elimag 6031* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elima 6032* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elima2 6033* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elima3 6034* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nfima 6035 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for image. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfimad 6036 | Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 6035. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imadmrn 6037 | The image of the domain of a class is the range of the class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ dom 𝐴) = ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | imassrn 6038 | The image of a class is a subset of its range. Theorem 3.16(xi) of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | mptima 6039* | Image of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mptimass 6040* | Image of a function in maps-to notation for a subset. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imai 6041 | Image under the identity relation. Theorem 3.16(viii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) |
| ⊢ ( I “ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnresi 6042 | The range of the restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ran ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | resiima 6043 | The image of a restriction of the identity function. (Contributed by FL, 31-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (( I ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ima0 6044 | Image of the empty set. Theorem 3.16(ii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | 0ima 6045 | Image under the empty relation. (Contributed by FL, 11-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (∅ “ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | csbima12 6046 | Move class substitution in and out of the image of a function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 20-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imadisj 6047 | A class whose image under another is empty is disjoint with the other's domain. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | imadisjlnd 6048 | Deduction form of one negated side of imadisj 6047. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimass 6049 | A preimage under any class is included in the domain of the class. (Contributed by FL, 29-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cnvimarndm 6050 | The preimage of the range of a class is the domain of the class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝐴 “ ran 𝐴) = dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | imasng 6051* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | relimasn 6052* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | elrelimasn 6053 | Elementhood in the image of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasng1 6054 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) Revise to use df-br 5101 and to prove elimasn1 6055 from it. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasn1 6055 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Use df-br 5101 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elimasng 6056 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasng1 6054, remove, and relabel elimasng1 6054 to "elimasng". |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasn 6057 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasn1 6055, remove, and relabel elimasn1 6055 to "elimasn". |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elimasni 6058 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | args 6059* | Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6839 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | elinisegg 6060 | Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Put in closed form and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eliniseg 6061 | Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. An application is to express initial segments for an order relation. See for example Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | epin 6062 | Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | epini 6063 | Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iniseg 6064* | An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | inisegn0 6065 | Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dffr3 6066* | Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dfse2 6067* | Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | imass1 6068 | Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imass2 6069 | Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ndmima 6070 | The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | relcnv 6071 | A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
| ⊢ Rel ◡𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | relbrcnvg 6072 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5839 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | eliniseg2 6073 | Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 6061. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | relbrcnv 6074 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5839 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relco 6075 | A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cotrg 6076* | Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 6077 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6077. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2163. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cotr 6077* | Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 6076. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | idrefALT 6078* | Alternate proof of idref 7101 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | cnvsym 6079* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2163. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | intasym 6080* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | asymref 6081* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6241. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | asymref2 6082* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | intirr 6083* | Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | brcodir 6084* | Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | codir 6085* | Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | qfto 6086* | A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | xpidtr 6087 | A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | trin2 6088 | The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | poirr2 6089 | A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | trinxp 6090 | The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | soirri 6091 | A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sotri 6092 | A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | son2lpi 6093 | A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sotri2 6094 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sotri3 6095 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | poleloe 6096 | Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | poltletr 6097 | Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | somin1 6098 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | somincom 6099 | Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | somin2 6100 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |