P. 61 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 6001-6100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	iss 6001	A subclass of the identity function is the identity function restricted to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ↾ dom 𝐴))
Theorem	resopab2 6002*	Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)})
Theorem	resmpt 6003*	Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	resmpt3 6004*	Unconditional restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	resmptf 6005	Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	resmptd 6006*	Restriction of the mapping operation, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	dfres2 6007*	Alternate definition of the restriction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}
Theorem	mptss 6008*	Sufficient condition for inclusion among two functions in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))
Theorem	elimampt 6009*	Membership in the image of a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elidinxp 6010*	Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝐶 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩)
Theorem	elidinxpid 6011*	Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩)
Theorem	elrid 6012*	Characterization of the elements of a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩)
Theorem	idinxpres 6013	The intersection of the identity relation with a cartesian product is the restriction of the identity relation to the intersection of the factors. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) Generalize statement from cartesian square (now idinxpresid 6014) to cartesian product. (Revised by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	idinxpresid 6014	The intersection of the identity relation with the cartesian square of a class is the restriction of the identity relation to that class. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	idssxp 6015	A diagonal set as a subset of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 9-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	opabresid 6016*	The restricted identity relation expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)}
Theorem	mptresid 6017*	The restricted identity relation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥)
Theorem	dmresi 6018	The domain of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.)
⊢ dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	restidsing 6019	Restriction of the identity to a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 6-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ( I ↾ {𝐴}) = ({𝐴} × {𝐴})
Theorem	iresn0n0 6020	The identity function restricted to a class 𝐴 is empty iff the class 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	imaeq1 6021	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imaeq2 6022	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	imaeq1i 6023	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)
Theorem	imaeq2i 6024	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)
Theorem	imaeq1d 6025	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imaeq2d 6026	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	imaeq12d 6027	Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐷))
Theorem	dfima2 6028*	Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐴𝑦}
Theorem	dfima3 6029*	Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴)}
Theorem	elimag 6030*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴))
Theorem	elima 6031*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴)
Theorem	elima2 6032*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥𝐵𝐴))
Theorem	elima3 6033*	Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nfima 6034	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for image. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵)
Theorem	nfimad 6035	Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 6034. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	imadmrn 6036	The image of the domain of a class is the range of the class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ dom 𝐴) = ran 𝐴
Theorem	imassrn 6037	The image of a class is a subset of its range. Theorem 3.16(xi) of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴
Theorem	mptima 6038*	Image of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	mptimass 6039*	Image of a function in maps-to notation for a subset. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵))
Theorem	imai 6040	Image under the identity relation. Theorem 3.16(viii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
⊢ ( I “ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	rnresi 6041	The range of the restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ran ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	resiima 6042	The image of a restriction of the identity function. (Contributed by FL, 31-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (( I ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ima0 6043	Image of the empty set. Theorem 3.16(ii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 “ ∅) = ∅
Theorem	0ima 6044	Image under the empty relation. (Contributed by FL, 11-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (∅ “ 𝐴) = ∅
Theorem	csbima12 6045	Move class substitution in and out of the image of a function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 20-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
Theorem	imadisj 6046	A class whose image under another is empty is disjoint with the other's domain. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	imadisjlnd 6047	Deduction form of one negated side of imadisj 6046. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	cnvimass 6048	A preimage under any class is included in the domain of the class. (Contributed by FL, 29-Jan-2007.)
⊢ (◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴
Theorem	cnvimarndm 6049	The preimage of the range of a class is the domain of the class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (◡𝐴 “ ran 𝐴) = dom 𝐴
Theorem	imasng 6050*	The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦})
Theorem	relimasn 6051*	The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦})
Theorem	elrelimasn 6052	Elementhood in the image of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	elimasng1 6053	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) Revise to use df-br 5087 and to prove elimasn1 6054 from it. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶))
Theorem	elimasn1 6054	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Use df-br 5087 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶)
Theorem	elimasng 6055	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasng1 6053, remove, and relabel elimasng1 6053 to "elimasng".
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elimasn 6056	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasn1 6054, remove, and relabel elimasn1 6054 to "elimasn".
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elimasni 6057	Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶)
Theorem	args 6058*	Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6838 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦}
Theorem	elinisegg 6059	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Put in closed form and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	eliniseg 6060	Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. An application is to express initial segments for an order relation. See for example Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	epin 6061	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	epini 6062	Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴
Theorem	iniseg 6063*	An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵})
Theorem	inisegn0 6064	Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	dffr3 6065*	Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅))
Theorem	dfse2 6066*	Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V)
Theorem	imass1 6067	Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶))
Theorem	imass2 6068	Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	ndmima 6069	The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅)
Theorem	relcnv 6070	A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.)
⊢ Rel ◡𝐴
Theorem	relbrcnvg 6071	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5838 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	eliniseg2 6072	Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 6060. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵))
Theorem	relbrcnv 6073	When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5838 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Rel 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	relco 6074	A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cotrg 6075*	Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 6076 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6076. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2163. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧))
Theorem	cotr 6076*	Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 6075. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	idrefALT 6077*	Alternate proof of idref 7100 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	cnvsym 6078*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2163. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	intasym 6079*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref 6080*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6240. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	asymref2 6081*	Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	intirr 6082*	Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	brcodir 6083*	Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	codir 6084*	Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	qfto 6085*	A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	xpidtr 6086	A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	trin2 6087	The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	poirr2 6088	A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅)
Theorem	trinxp 6089	The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	soirri 6090	A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴
Theorem	sotri 6091	A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	son2lpi 6092	A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	sotri2 6093	A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	sotri3 6094	A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	poleloe 6095	Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	poltletr 6096	Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	somin1 6097	Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴)
Theorem	somincom 6098	Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴))
Theorem	somin2 6099	Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵)
Theorem	soltmin 6100	Being less than a minimum, for a general total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶)))