| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 61 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31067) |
(31068-32590) |
(32591-50390) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | rnresss 6001 | The range of a restriction is a subset of the whole range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | xpssres 6002 | Restriction of a constant function (or other Cartesian product). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐶 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elinxp 6003* | Membership in an intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | elres 6004* | Membership in a restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elsnres 6005* | Membership in restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↾ {𝐶}) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝐶, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | relssres 6006 | Simplification law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dmressnsn 6007 | The domain of a restriction to a singleton is a singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) = {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | eldmressnsn 6008 | The element of the domain of a restriction to a singleton is the element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → 𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | eldmeldmressn 6009 | An element of the domain (of a relation) is an element of the domain of the restriction (of the relation) to the singleton containing this element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | resdm 6010 | A relation restricted to its domain equals itself. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↾ dom 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | resexg 6011 | The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | resexd 6012 | The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | resex 6013 | The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | resindm 6014 | When restricting a class, intersecting with the domain of the class has no effect. (Contributed by FL, 6-Oct-2008.) Remove antecedent. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 16-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resindmOLD 6015 | Obsolete version of resindm 6014 as of 16-Jun-2026. (Contributed by FL, 6-Oct-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resdmdfsn 6016 | Restricting a class to its domain without a set is the same as restricting the class to the universe without this set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2018.) Remove antecedent. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 16-Jun-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ (V ∖ {𝑋})) = (𝑅 ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∖ {𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | resdmdfsnOLD 6017 | Obsolete version of resdmdfsn 6016 as of 16-Jun-2026. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ (V ∖ {𝑋})) = (𝑅 ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∖ {𝑋}))) | ||
| Theorem | reldisjun 6018 | Split a relation into two disjoint parts based on its domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → 𝑅 = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | relresdm1 6019 | Restriction of a disjoint union to the domain of the first term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (dom 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↾ dom 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | resopab 6020* | Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | ||
| Theorem | iss 6021 | A subclass of the identity function is the identity function restricted to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ↾ dom 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | resopab2 6022* | Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | resmpt 6023* | Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resmpt3 6024* | Unconditional restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resmptf 6025 | Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resmptd 6026* | Restriction of the mapping operation, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dfres2 6027* | Alternate definition of the restriction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)} | ||
| Theorem | mptss 6028* | Sufficient condition for inclusion among two functions in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elimampt 6029* | Membership in the image of a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elidinxp 6030* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝐶 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | elidinxpid 6031* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | elrid 6032* | Characterization of the elements of a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | idinxpres 6033 | The intersection of the identity relation with a cartesian product is the restriction of the identity relation to the intersection of the factors. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) Generalize statement from cartesian square (now idinxpresid 6034) to cartesian product. (Revised by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idinxpresid 6034 | The intersection of the identity relation with the cartesian square of a class is the restriction of the identity relation to that class. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | idssxp 6035 | A diagonal set as a subset of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | opabresid 6036* | The restricted identity relation expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)} | ||
| Theorem | mptresid 6037* | The restricted identity relation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | dmresi 6038 | The domain of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | restidsing 6039 | Restriction of the identity to a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 6-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ {𝐴}) = ({𝐴} × {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | iresn0n0 6040 | The identity function restricted to a class 𝐴 is empty iff the class 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1 6041 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2 6042 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1i 6043 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2i 6044 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1d 6045 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2d 6046 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq12d 6047 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | dfima2 6048* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfima3 6049* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴)} | ||
| Theorem | elimag 6050* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elima 6051* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elima2 6052* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elima3 6053* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nfima 6054 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for image. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfimad 6055 | Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 6054. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imadmrn 6056 | The image of the domain of a class is the range of the class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ dom 𝐴) = ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | imassrn 6057 | The image of a class is a subset of its range. Theorem 3.16(xi) of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | mptima 6058* | Image of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mptimass 6059* | Image of a function in maps-to notation for a subset. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imai 6060 | Image under the identity relation. Theorem 3.16(viii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) |
| ⊢ ( I “ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnresi 6061 | The range of the restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ran ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | resiima 6062 | The image of a restriction of the identity function. (Contributed by FL, 31-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (( I ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ima0 6063 | Image of the empty set. Theorem 3.16(ii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | 0ima 6064 | Image under the empty relation. (Contributed by FL, 11-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (∅ “ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | csbima12 6065 | Move class substitution in and out of the image of a function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 20-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imadisj 6066 | A class whose image under another is empty is disjoint with the other's domain. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | imadisjlnd 6067 | Deduction form of one negated side of imadisj 6066. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimass 6068 | A preimage under any class is included in the domain of the class. (Contributed by FL, 29-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cnvimarndm 6069 | The preimage of the range of a class is the domain of the class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝐴 “ ran 𝐴) = dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | imasng 6070* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | relimasn 6071* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | elrelimasn 6072 | Elementhood in the image of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasng1 6073 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) Revise to use df-br 5100 and to prove elimasn1 6074 from it. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasn1 6074 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Use df-br 5100 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elimasng 6075 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasng1 6073, remove, and relabel elimasng1 6073 to "elimasng". |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasn 6076 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasn1 6074, remove, and relabel elimasn1 6074 to "elimasn". |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elimasni 6077 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | args 6078* | Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6860 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | elinisegg 6079 | Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Put in closed form and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eliniseg 6080 | Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. An application is to express initial segments for an order relation. See for example Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | epin 6081 | Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | epini 6082 | Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iniseg 6083* | An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | inisegn0 6084 | Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dffr3 6085* | Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dfse2 6086* | Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | imass1 6087 | Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imass2 6088 | Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ndmima 6089 | The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | relcnv 6090 | A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
| ⊢ Rel ◡𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | relbrcnvg 6091 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5852 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | eliniseg2 6092 | Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 6080. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | relbrcnv 6093 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5852 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relco 6094 | A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cotrg 6095* | Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 6096 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6096. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2190. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cotr 6096* | Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 6095. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | idrefALT 6097* | Alternate proof of idref 7124 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | cnvsym 6098* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2190. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | intasym 6099* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | asymref 6100* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6258. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |