| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 61 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30900) |
(30901-32423) |
(32424-49930) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | idinxpresid 6001 | The intersection of the identity relation with the cartesian square of a class is the restriction of the identity relation to that class. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | idssxp 6002 | A diagonal set as a subset of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | opabresid 6003* | The restricted identity relation expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)} | ||
| Theorem | mptresid 6004* | The restricted identity relation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | dmresi 6005 | The domain of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | restidsing 6006 | Restriction of the identity to a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 6-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ {𝐴}) = ({𝐴} × {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | iresn0n0 6007 | The identity function restricted to a class 𝐴 is empty iff the class 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1 6008 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2 6009 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1i 6010 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2i 6011 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq1d 6012 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq2d 6013 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imaeq12d 6014 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | dfima2 6015* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | dfima3 6016* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴)} | ||
| Theorem | elimag 6017* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elima 6018* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elima2 6019* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elima3 6020* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nfima 6021 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for image. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | nfimad 6022 | Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 6021. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imadmrn 6023 | The image of the domain of a class is the range of the class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ dom 𝐴) = ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | imassrn 6024 | The image of a class is a subset of its range. Theorem 3.16(xi) of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | mptima 6025* | Image of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | mptimass 6026* | Image of a function in maps-to notation for a subset. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | imai 6027 | Image under the identity relation. Theorem 3.16(viii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) |
| ⊢ ( I “ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnresi 6028 | The range of the restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ ran ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | resiima 6029 | The image of a restriction of the identity function. (Contributed by FL, 31-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (( I ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ima0 6030 | Image of the empty set. Theorem 3.16(ii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 “ ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | 0ima 6031 | Image under the empty relation. (Contributed by FL, 11-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (∅ “ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | csbima12 6032 | Move class substitution in and out of the image of a function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 20-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | imadisj 6033 | A class whose image under another is empty is disjoint with the other's domain. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | imadisjlnd 6034 | Deduction form of one negated side of imadisj 6033. (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | cnvimass 6035 | A preimage under any class is included in the domain of the class. (Contributed by FL, 29-Jan-2007.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | cnvimarndm 6036 | The preimage of the range of a class is the domain of the class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝐴 “ ran 𝐴) = dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | imasng 6037* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | relimasn 6038* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | elrelimasn 6039 | Elementhood in the image of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasng1 6040 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) Revise to use df-br 5094 and to prove elimasn1 6041 from it. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasn1 6041 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Use df-br 5094 and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐵𝐴𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elimasng 6042 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasng1 6040, remove, and relabel elimasng1 6040 to "elimasng". |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | elimasn 6043 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) TODO: replace existing usages by usages of elimasn1 6041, remove, and relabel elimasn1 6041 to "elimasn". |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elimasni 6044 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | args 6045* | Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6825 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | elinisegg 6046 | Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Put in closed form and shorten proof. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eliniseg 6047 | Membership in the inverse image of a singleton. An application is to express initial segments for an order relation. See for example Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | epin 6048 | Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | epini 6049 | Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | iniseg 6050* | An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | inisegn0 6051 | Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dffr3 6052* | Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dfse2 6053* | Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | imass1 6054 | Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imass2 6055 | Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ndmima 6056 | The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | relcnv 6057 | A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
| ⊢ Rel ◡𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | relbrcnvg 6058 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5826 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | eliniseg2 6059 | Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 6047. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | relbrcnv 6060 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5826 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relco 6061 | A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cotrg 6062* | Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 6063 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 6063. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2162. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cotr 6063* | Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 6062. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | idrefALT 6064* | Alternate proof of idref 7085 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | cnvsym 6065* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2162. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | intasym 6066* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | asymref 6067* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6227. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | asymref2 6068* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | intirr 6069* | Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | brcodir 6070* | Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | codir 6071* | Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | qfto 6072* | A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | xpidtr 6073 | A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | trin2 6074 | The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | poirr2 6075 | A partial order is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | trinxp 6076 | The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | soirri 6077 | A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sotri 6078 | A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | son2lpi 6079 | A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | sotri2 6080 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | sotri3 6081 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | poleloe 6082 | Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | poltletr 6083 | Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | somin1 6084 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | somincom 6085 | Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | somin2 6086 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | soltmin 6087 | Being less than a minimum, for a general total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | cnvopab 6088* | The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2146, ax-12 2182. (Revised by SN, 7-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ ◡{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | cnvopabOLD 6089* | Obsolete version of cnvopab 6088 as of 7-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ◡{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | mptcnv 6090* | The converse of a mapping function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | cnv0 6091 | The converse of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1998.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5236, ax-nul 5246, ax-pr 5372. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.) Avoid ax-12 2182. (Revised by TM, 31-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ ◡∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | cnv0OLD 6092 | Obsolete version of cnv0 6091 as of 31-Jan-2026. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1998.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5236, ax-nul 5246, ax-pr 5372. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ◡∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | cnvi 6093 | The converse of the identity relation. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ◡ I = I | ||
| Theorem | cnvun 6094 | The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∪ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvdif 6095 | Distributive law for converse over class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∖ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvin 6096 | Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∩ ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnun 6097 | Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnin 6098 | The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rniun 6099 | The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ran ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rnuni 6100* | The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ran ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |