Theorem tz7.2 5564

Description: Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to the antecedent E Fr 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz7.2	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem tz7.2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trss 5196	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
2		efrirr 5561	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
3		eleq1 2826	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4	3	notbid 317	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	2, 4	syl5ibrcom 246	. . . 4 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6	5	necon2ad 2957	. . 3 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))
7	1, 6	anim12ii 617	. 2 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)))
8	7	3impia 1115	1 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2942   ⊆ wss 3883  Tr wtr 5187   E cep 5485   Fr wfr 5532

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-11 2156  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-tr 5188  df-eprel 5486  df-fr 5535

This theorem is referenced by:  tz7.7  6277  trelpss  41962