Theorem tz7.2 5573

Description: Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to the antecedent E Fr 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz7.2	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem tz7.2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trss 5200	. . 3 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
2		efrirr 5570	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
3		eleq1 2826	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
4	3	notbid 318	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
5	2, 4	syl5ibrcom 246	. . . 4 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6	5	necon2ad 2958	. . 3 ⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))
7	1, 6	anim12ii 618	. 2 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)))
8	7	3impia 1116	1 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2943   ⊆ wss 3887  Tr wtr 5191   E cep 5494   Fr wfr 5541

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-11 2154  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-tr 5192  df-eprel 5495  df-fr 5544

This theorem is referenced by:  tz7.7  6292  trelpss  42073