Theorem cbvreucsf 3123

Description: A more general version of cbvreuv 2707 that has no distinct variable rextrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvralcsf.1	|- F/_ y A
cbvralcsf.2	|- F/_ x B
cbvralcsf.3	|- F/ y ph
cbvralcsf.4	|- F/ x ps
cbvralcsf.5	|- ( x = y -> A = B )
cbvralcsf.6	|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvreucsf	|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. B ps )

Proof of Theorem cbvreucsf

Dummy variables v z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1528	. . . 4 |- F/ z ( x e. A /\ ph )
2		nfcsb1v 3092	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ x [_ z / x ]_ A
3	2	nfcri 2313	. . . . 5 |- F/ x z e. [_ z / x ]_ A
4		nfs1v 1939	. . . . 5 |- F/ x [ z / x ] ph
5	3, 4	nfan 1565	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( z e. [_ z / x ]_ A /\ [ z / x ] ph )
6		id 19	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = z -> x = z )
7		csbeq1a 3068	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = z -> A = [_ z / x ]_ A )
8	6, 7	eleq12d 2248	. . . . 5 |- ( x = z -> ( x e. A <-> z e. [_ z / x ]_ A ) )
9		sbequ12 1771	. . . . 5 |- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> [ z / x ] ph ) )
10	8, 9	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 |- ( x = z -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( z e. [_ z / x ]_ A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) ) )
11	1, 5, 10	cbveu 2050	. . 3 |- ( E! x ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> E! z ( z e. [_ z / x ]_ A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) )
12		nfcv 2319	. . . . . . 7 |- F/_ y z
13		cbvralcsf.1	. . . . . . 7 |- F/_ y A
14	12, 13	nfcsb 3096	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ y [_ z / x ]_ A
15	14	nfcri 2313	. . . . 5 |- F/ y z e. [_ z / x ]_ A
16		cbvralcsf.3	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y ph
17	16	nfsb 1946	. . . . 5 |- F/ y [ z / x ] ph
18	15, 17	nfan 1565	. . . 4 |- F/ y ( z e. [_ z / x ]_ A /\ [ z / x ] ph )
19		nfv 1528	. . . 4 |- F/ z ( y e. B /\ ps )
20		id 19	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = y -> z = y )
21		csbeq1 3062	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = y -> [_ z / x ]_ A = [_ y / x ]_ A )
22		sbsbc 2968	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( [ y / x ] v e. A <-> [. y / x ]. v e. A )
23	22	abbii 2293	. . . . . . . 8 |- { v | [ y / x ] v e. A } = { v | [. y / x ]. v e. A }
24		cbvralcsf.2	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- F/_ x B
25	24	nfcri 2313	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- F/ x v e. B
26		cbvralcsf.5	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( x = y -> A = B )
27	26	eleq2d 2247	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( x = y -> ( v e. A <-> v e. B ) )
28	25, 27	sbie 1791	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( [ y / x ] v e. A <-> v e. B )
29	28	bicomi 132	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( v e. B <-> [ y / x ] v e. A )
30	29	abbi2i 2292	. . . . . . . 8 |- B = { v | [ y / x ] v e. A }
31		df-csb 3060	. . . . . . . 8 |- [_ y / x ]_ A = { v | [. y / x ]. v e. A }
32	23, 30, 31	3eqtr4ri 2209	. . . . . . 7 |- [_ y / x ]_ A = B
33	21, 32	eqtrdi 2226	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = y -> [_ z / x ]_ A = B )
34	20, 33	eleq12d 2248	. . . . 5 |- ( z = y -> ( z e. [_ z / x ]_ A <-> y e. B ) )
35		sbequ 1840	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph ) )
36		cbvralcsf.4	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ x ps
37		cbvralcsf.6	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
38	36, 37	sbie 1791	. . . . . 6 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )
39	35, 38	bitrdi 196	. . . . 5 |- ( z = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> ps ) )
40	34, 39	anbi12d 473	. . . 4 |- ( z = y -> ( ( z e. [_ z / x ]_ A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) <-> ( y e. B /\ ps ) ) )
41	18, 19, 40	cbveu 2050	. . 3 |- ( E! z ( z e. [_ z / x ]_ A /\ [ z / x ] ph ) <-> E! y ( y e. B /\ ps ) )
42	11, 41	bitri 184	. 2 |- ( E! x ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> E! y ( y e. B /\ ps ) )
43		df-reu 2462	. 2 |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
44		df-reu 2462	. 2 |- ( E! y e. B ps <-> E! y ( y e. B /\ ps ) )
45	42, 43, 44	3bitr4i 212	1 |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. B ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1353   F/wnf 1460   [wsb 1762   E!weu 2026   e. wcel 2148   {cab 2163   F/_wnfc 2306   E!wreu 2457   [.wsbc 2964   [_csb 3059

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-reu 2462  df-sbc 2965  df-csb 3060

This theorem is referenced by: (None)