Theorem undif3ss 3420

Description: A subset relationship involving class union and class difference. In classical logic, this would be equality rather than subset, as in the first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
undif3ss	⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem undif3ss

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elun 3300	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
2		eldif 3162	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	orbi2i 763	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
4		orc 713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5		olc 712	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
6	4, 5	jca 306	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
7		olc 712	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
8		orc 713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
9	7, 8	anim12i 338	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
10	6, 9	jaoi 717	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
11		simpl 109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
12	11	orcd 734	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
13		olc 712	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
14		orc 713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
15	14	adantr 276	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
16	14	adantl 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
17	12, 13, 15, 16	ccase 966	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
18	10, 17	impbii 126	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
19	1, 3, 18	3bitri 206	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
20		elun 3300	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	biimpri 133	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
22		pm4.53r 752	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
23		eldif 3162	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
24	22, 23	sylnibr 678	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))
25	21, 24	anim12i 338	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
26		eldif 3162	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
27	25, 26	sylibr 134	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
28	19, 27	sylbi 121	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) → 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
29	28	ssriv 3183	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 709   ∈ wcel 2164   ∖ cdif 3150   ∪ cun 3151   ⊆ wss 3153

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-v 2762  df-dif 3155  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166

This theorem is referenced by: (None)