![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > pm5.21nd | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional. Variant of pm5.21ndd 380. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
pm5.21nd.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
pm5.21nd.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
pm5.21nd.3 | ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
pm5.21nd | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pm5.21nd.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) | |
2 | 1 | ex 413 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) |
3 | pm5.21nd.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
4 | 3 | ex 413 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) |
5 | pm5.21nd.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 5 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
7 | 2, 4, 6 | pm5.21ndd 380 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 396 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 |
This theorem is referenced by: ideqg 5851 fvelimab 6964 brrpssg 7717 ordsucelsuc 7812 releldm2 8031 relbrtpos 8224 relelec 8750 elfiun 9427 fpwwe2lem2 10629 fpwwelem 10642 fzrev3 13569 elfzp12 13582 eqgval 19059 eltg 22467 eltg2 22468 cncnp2 22792 isref 23020 islocfin 23028 opeldifid 31868 isfne 35310 copsex2b 36107 bj-ideqgALT 36125 bj-idreseq 36129 bj-ideqg1ALT 36132 opelopab3 36672 isdivrngo 36904 brssr 37457 islshpkrN 38076 dihatexv2 40296 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |