Theorem bnj1143 34987

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1143	⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem bnj1143

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-iun 4926	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}
2		notnotb 317	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)
3		neq0 4283	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
4	2, 3	xchbinx 336	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5		df-rex 3066	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
6		exsimpl 1876	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
7	5, 6	sylbi 219	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
8	7	con3i 154	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
9	4, 8	sylbi 219	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
10	9	alrimiv 1935	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑧 ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
11		notnotb 317	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅ ↔ ¬ ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅)
12		neq0 4283	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
13	1	eqeq1i 2746	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ ↔ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅)
14	13	notbii 322	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅ ↔ ¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅)
15		df-iun 4926	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵}
16	15	eleq2i 2833	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵})
17	16	exbii 1856	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵})
18	12, 14, 17	3bitr3i 303	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵})
19	11, 18	xchbinx 336	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵})
20		alnex 1789	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} ↔ ¬ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵})
21		abid 2723	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
22	21	notbii 322	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
23	22	albii 1827	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵} ↔ ∀𝑧 ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
24	19, 20, 23	3bitr2i 301	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
25	10, 24	sylibr 236	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵} = ∅)
26	1, 25	eqtrid 2788	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∅)
27		0ss 4331	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ⊆ 𝐵
28	26, 27	eqsstrdi 3961	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵)
29		iunconst 4934	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐵)
30		eqimss 3975	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵)
31	29, 30	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵)
32	28, 31	pm2.61ine 3019	1 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 397  ∀wal 1546   = wceq 1548  ∃wex 1787   ∈ wcel 2121  {cab 2719   ≠ wne 2936  ∃wrex 3065   ⊆ wss 3885  ∅c0 4264  ∪ ciun 4924

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-12 2191  ax-ext 2713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-tru 1551  df-fal 1561  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2937  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3066  df-v 3435  df-dif 3888  df-ss 3902  df-nul 4265  df-iun 4926

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1146  34988  bnj1145  35190  bnj1136  35194