Theorem bnj229 35380

Description: Technical lemma for bnj517 35381. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj229.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj229	⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ⊆ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑖,𝐹,𝑚,𝑦   𝑖,𝑁,𝑚   𝑅,𝑖,𝑚

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑛)   𝐹(𝑛)   𝑁(𝑦, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj229

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj213 35378	. . 3 ⊢ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐴
2	1	bnj226 35231	. 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐴
3		bnj229.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4	3	bnj222 35379	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑚 ∈ ω (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5	4	bnj228 35232	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓) → (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
6	5	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
7		eleq1 2850	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 → (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁))
8		fveqeq2 6891	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 → ((𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
9	7, 8	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 → ((suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
10	9	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → ((suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11	6, 10	mpbid 235	. . . 4 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12	11	3impb 1132	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
13	12	impcom 413	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
14	2, 13	bnj1262 35306	1 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ⊆ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078   ⊆ wss 3902  ∪ ciun 4954  suc csuc 6363  ‘cfv 6537  ωcom 7865   predc-bnj14 35185

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fv 6545  df-bnj14 35186

This theorem is used by: (None)