Theorem bnj229 35281

Description: Technical lemma for bnj517 35282. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj229.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj229	⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ⊆ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑖,𝑚,𝑦   𝑖,𝐹,𝑚,𝑦   𝑖,𝑁,𝑚   𝑅,𝑖,𝑚

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑖, 𝑚, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑛)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑛)   𝐹(𝑛)   𝑁(𝑦, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj229

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj213 35279	. . 3 ⊢ pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐴
2	1	bnj226 35132	. 2 ⊢ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐴
3		bnj229.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4	3	bnj222 35280	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑚 ∈ ω (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5	4	bnj228 35133	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓) → (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
6	5	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
7		eleq1 2850	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 → (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 ↔ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁))
8		fveqeq2 6890	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 → ((𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
9	7, 8	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 → ((suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
10	9	adantr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → ((suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11	6, 10	mpbid 235	. . . 4 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12	11	3impb 1131	. . 3 ⊢ ((suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
13	12	impcom 412	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
14	2, 13	bnj1262 35207	1 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ⊆ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3078   ⊆ wss 3904  ∪ ciun 4955  suc csuc 6362  ‘cfv 6536  ωcom 7860   predc-bnj14 35086

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fv 6544  df-bnj14 35087

This theorem is used by: (None)