Theorem bnj985v 35350

Description: Version of bnj985 35351 with an additional disjoint variable condition, not requiring ax-13 2403. (Contributed by GG, 27-Mar-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj985v.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj985v.6	⊢ (𝜒′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
bnj985v.9	⊢ (𝜒″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜒′)
bnj985v.11	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
bnj985v.13	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj985v	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑝𝜒″)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐺,𝑝   𝜒,𝑝   𝑓,𝑝   𝑛,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜓(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜒(𝑓, 𝑛)   𝐵(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐶(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝐺(𝑓, 𝑛)   𝜒′(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)   𝜒″(𝑓, 𝑛, 𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj985v

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj985v.13	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑛, 𝐶⟩})
2	1	bnj918 35164	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
3		bnj985v.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
4		bnj985v.11	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
5	3, 4	bnj984 35349	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (𝐺 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]∃𝑛𝜒))
6	2, 5	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]∃𝑛𝜒)
7		sbcex2 3803	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐺 / 𝑓]∃𝑝𝜒′ ↔ ∃𝑝[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜒′)
8		nfv 1943	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑝𝜒
9	8	sb8ef 2386	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑛𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑝[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
10		sbsbc 3747	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒 ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
11	10	exbii 1877	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑝[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑝[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
12	9, 11	bitri 278	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑛𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑝[𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
13		bnj985v.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒′ ↔ [𝑝 / 𝑛]𝜒)
14	12, 13	bnj133 35125	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑛𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑝𝜒′)
15	14	sbcbii 3799	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐺 / 𝑓]∃𝑛𝜒 ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]∃𝑝𝜒′)
16		bnj985v.9	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜒′)
17	16	exbii 1877	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑝𝜒″ ↔ ∃𝑝[𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜒′)
18	7, 15, 17	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐺 / 𝑓]∃𝑛𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑝𝜒″)
19	6, 18	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑝𝜒″)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1808  [wsb 2095   ∈ wcel 2142  {cab 2740  ∃wrex 3088  Vcvv 3454  [wsbc 3743   ∪ cun 3902  {csn 4588  ⟨cop 4594   Fn wfn 6531   ∧ w-bnj17 35084

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-rex 3089  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-un 3909  df-ss 3921  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-uni 4872  df-bnj17 35085

This theorem is used by:  bnj1018  35361