Theorem ltprord 10939

Description: Positive real 'less than' in terms of proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltprord	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ltprord

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2822	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ P ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P))
2	1	anbi1d 631	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P)))
3		psseq1 4040	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦)))
5		eleq1 2822	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ P ↔ 𝐵 ∈ P))
6	5	anbi2d 630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P)))
7		psseq2 4041	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
9		df-ltp 10894	. . 3 ⊢ <P = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦)}
10	4, 8, 9	brabg 5485	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
11	10	bianabs 541	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113   ⊊ wpss 3900   class class class wbr 5096  Pcnp 10768  <_P cltp 10772

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5239  ax-nul 5249  ax-pr 5375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2809  df-ne 2931  df-rab 3398  df-v 3440  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-sn 4579  df-pr 4581  df-op 4585  df-br 5097  df-opab 5159  df-ltp 10894

This theorem is referenced by:  ltsopr  10941  ltaddpr  10943  ltexprlem7  10951  ltexpri  10952  suplem1pr  10961  suplem2pr  10962