Theorem ltprord 11040

Description: Positive real 'less than' in terms of proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltprord	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ltprord

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ P ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P))
2	1	anbi1d 643	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P)))
3		psseq1 4041	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦)))
5		eleq1 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ P ↔ 𝐵 ∈ P))
6	5	anbi2d 642	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P)))
7		psseq2 4042	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
9		df-ltp 10995	. . 3 ⊢ <P = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦)}
10	4, 8, 9	brabg 5522	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
11	10	bianabs 551	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊊ wpss 3903   class class class wbr 5107  Pcnp 10869  <_P cltp 10873

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5402

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-ltp 10995

This theorem is used by:  ltsopr  11042  ltaddpr  11044  ltexprlem7  11052  ltexpri  11053  suplem1pr  11062  suplem2pr  11063