Theorem ltprord 11045

Description: Positive real 'less than' in terms of proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltprord	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ltprord

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ P ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P))
2	1	anbi1d 629	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P)))
3		psseq1 4083	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦)))
5		eleq1 2816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ P ↔ 𝐵 ∈ P))
6	5	anbi2d 628	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P)))
7		psseq2 4084	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
9		df-ltp 11000	. . 3 ⊢ <P = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦)}
10	4, 8, 9	brabg 5535	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
11	10	bianabs 541	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099   ⊊ wpss 3945   class class class wbr 5142  Pcnp 10874  <_P cltp 10878

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-ext 2698  ax-sep 5293  ax-nul 5300  ax-pr 5423

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2705  df-cleq 2719  df-clel 2805  df-ne 2936  df-rab 3428  df-v 3471  df-dif 3947  df-un 3949  df-in 3951  df-ss 3961  df-pss 3963  df-nul 4319  df-if 4525  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-op 4631  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-ltp 11000

This theorem is referenced by:  ltsopr  11047  ltaddpr  11049  ltexprlem7  11057  ltexpri  11058  suplem1pr  11067  suplem2pr  11068