Theorem ltprord 10945

Description: Positive real 'less than' in terms of proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltprord	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ltprord

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2825	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ P ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P))
2	1	anbi1d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P)))
3		psseq1 4043	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 633	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦)))
5		eleq1 2825	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ P ↔ 𝐵 ∈ P))
6	5	anbi2d 631	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P)))
7		psseq2 4044	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 633	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
9		df-ltp 10900	. . 3 ⊢ <P = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦)}
10	4, 8, 9	brabg 5488	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
11	10	bianabs 541	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ⊊ wpss 3903   class class class wbr 5099  Pcnp 10774  <_P cltp 10778

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5242  ax-nul 5252  ax-pr 5378

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-ne 2934  df-rab 3401  df-v 3443  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4481  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-ltp 10900

This theorem is referenced by:  ltsopr  10947  ltaddpr  10949  ltexprlem7  10957  ltexpri  10958  suplem1pr  10967  suplem2pr  10968