Theorem ltprord 11024

Description: Positive real 'less than' in terms of proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltprord	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ltprord

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ P ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P))
2	1	anbi1d 629	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P)))
3		psseq1 4082	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦)))
5		eleq1 2815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑦 ∈ P ↔ 𝐵 ∈ P))
6	5	anbi2d 628	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P)))
7		psseq2 4083	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 630	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
9		df-ltp 10979	. . 3 ⊢ <P = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ P) ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦)}
10	4, 8, 9	brabg 5532	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)))
11	10	bianabs 541	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098   ⊊ wpss 3944   class class class wbr 5141  Pcnp 10853  <_P cltp 10857

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2935  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-pss 3962  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-ltp 10979

This theorem is referenced by:  ltsopr  11026  ltaddpr  11028  ltexprlem7  11036  ltexpri  11037  suplem1pr  11046  suplem2pr  11047