| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 111 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31067) |
(31068-32590) |
(32591-50390) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | addcanpr 11001 | Addition cancellation law for positive reals. Proposition 9-3.5(vi) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → ((𝐴 +P 𝐵) = (𝐴 +P 𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | prlem936 11002* | Lemma 9-3.6 of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 1Q <Q 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑥 ·Q 𝐵) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | reclem2pr 11003* | Lemma for Proposition 9-3.7 of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ ¬ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ 𝐴)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → 𝐵 ∈ P) | ||
| Theorem | reclem3pr 11004* | Lemma for Proposition 9-3.7(v) of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ ¬ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ 𝐴)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → 1P ⊆ (𝐴 ·P 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reclem4pr 11005* | Lemma for Proposition 9-3.7(v) of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 <Q 𝑦 ∧ ¬ (*Q‘𝑦) ∈ 𝐴)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (𝐴 ·P 𝐵) = 1P) | ||
| Theorem | recexpr 11006* | The reciprocal of a positive real exists. Part of Proposition 9-3.7(v) of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·P 𝑥) = 1P) | ||
| Theorem | suplem1pr 11007* | The union of a nonempty, bounded set of positive reals is a positive real. Part of Proposition 9-3.3 of [Gleason] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ P) | ||
| Theorem | suplem2pr 11008* | The union of a set of positive reals (if a positive real) is its supremum (the least upper bound). Part of Proposition 9-3.3 of [Gleason] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ P → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ ∪ 𝐴<P 𝑦) ∧ (𝑦<P ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | supexpr 11009* | The union of a nonempty, bounded set of positive reals has a supremum. Part of Proposition 9-3.3 of [Gleason] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥<P 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑦<P 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧))) | ||
| Definition | df-enr 11010* | Define equivalence relation for signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ~R = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (P × P) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (P × P)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 +P 𝑢) = (𝑤 +P 𝑣)))} | ||
| Definition | df-nr 11011 | Define class of signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ R = ((P × P) / ~R ) | ||
| Definition | df-plr 11012* | Define addition on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ +R = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [〈𝑢, 𝑓〉] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [〈(𝑤 +P 𝑢), (𝑣 +P 𝑓)〉] ~R ))} | ||
| Definition | df-mr 11013* | Define multiplication on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ·R = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [〈𝑢, 𝑓〉] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [〈((𝑤 ·P 𝑢) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑓)), ((𝑤 ·P 𝑓) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑢))〉] ~R ))} | ||
| Definition | df-ltr 11014* | Define ordering relation on signed reals. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.4 of [Gleason] p. 127. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ <R = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ R ∧ 𝑦 ∈ R) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ~R ∧ 𝑦 = [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ~R ) ∧ (𝑧 +P 𝑢)<P (𝑤 +P 𝑣)))} | ||
| Definition | df-0r 11015 | Define signed real constant 0. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0R = [〈1P, 1P〉] ~R | ||
| Definition | df-1r 11016 | Define signed real constant 1. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-4.2 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 1R = [〈(1P +P 1P), 1P〉] ~R | ||
| Definition | df-m1r 11017 | Define signed real constant -1. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11076, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ -1R = [〈1P, (1P +P 1P)〉] ~R | ||
| Theorem | enrer 11018 | The equivalence relation for signed reals is an equivalence relation. Proposition 9-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ~R Er (P × P) | ||
| Theorem | nrex1 11019 | The class of signed reals is a set. Note that a shorter proof is possible using qsex 8749 (and not requiring enrer 11018), but it would add a dependency on ax-rep 5226. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) Extract proof from that of axcnex 11102. (Revised by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ R ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | enrbreq 11020 | Equivalence relation for signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ~R 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | enreceq 11021 | Equivalence class equality of positive fractions in terms of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ~R = [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ~R ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | enrex 11022 | The equivalence relation for signed reals exists. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ~R ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | ltrelsr 11023 | Signed real 'less than' is a relation on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ <R ⊆ (R × R) | ||
| Theorem | addcmpblnr 11024 | Lemma showing compatibility of addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → 〈(𝐴 +P 𝐹), (𝐵 +P 𝐺)〉 ~R 〈(𝐶 +P 𝑅), (𝐷 +P 𝑆)〉)) | ||
| Theorem | mulcmpblnrlem 11025 | Lemma used in lemma showing compatibility of multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → ((𝐷 ·P 𝐹) +P (((𝐴 ·P 𝐹) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐺)) +P ((𝐶 ·P 𝑆) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑅)))) = ((𝐷 ·P 𝐹) +P (((𝐴 ·P 𝐺) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐹)) +P ((𝐶 ·P 𝑅) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑆))))) | ||
| Theorem | mulcmpblnr 11026 | Lemma showing compatibility of multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝐹 ∈ P ∧ 𝐺 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ P ∧ 𝑆 ∈ P))) → (((𝐴 +P 𝐷) = (𝐵 +P 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹 +P 𝑆) = (𝐺 +P 𝑅)) → 〈((𝐴 ·P 𝐹) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐺)), ((𝐴 ·P 𝐺) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐹))〉 ~R 〈((𝐶 ·P 𝑅) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑆)), ((𝐶 ·P 𝑆) +P (𝐷 ·P 𝑅))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | prsrlem1 11027* | Decomposing signed reals into positive reals. Lemma for addsrpr 11030 and mulsrpr 11031. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) ∧ ((𝐴 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [〈𝑢, 𝑡〉] ~R ) ∧ (𝐴 = [〈𝑠, 𝑓〉] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [〈𝑔, ℎ〉] ~R ))) → ((((𝑤 ∈ P ∧ 𝑣 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ P ∧ 𝑓 ∈ P)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ P ∧ 𝑡 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ P ∧ ℎ ∈ P))) ∧ ((𝑤 +P 𝑓) = (𝑣 +P 𝑠) ∧ (𝑢 +P ℎ) = (𝑡 +P 𝑔)))) | ||
| Theorem | addsrmo 11028* | There is at most one result from adding signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [〈𝑢, 𝑡〉] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [〈(𝑤 +P 𝑢), (𝑣 +P 𝑡)〉] ~R )) | ||
| Theorem | mulsrmo 11029* | There is at most one result from multiplying signed reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((P × P) / ~R )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ~R ∧ 𝐵 = [〈𝑢, 𝑡〉] ~R ) ∧ 𝑧 = [〈((𝑤 ·P 𝑢) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑡)), ((𝑤 ·P 𝑡) +P (𝑣 ·P 𝑢))〉] ~R )) | ||
| Theorem | addsrpr 11030 | Addition of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ~R +R [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ~R ) = [〈(𝐴 +P 𝐶), (𝐵 +P 𝐷)〉] ~R ) | ||
| Theorem | mulsrpr 11031 | Multiplication of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ P ∧ 𝐷 ∈ P)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ~R ·R [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ~R ) = [〈((𝐴 ·P 𝐶) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐷)), ((𝐴 ·P 𝐷) +P (𝐵 ·P 𝐶))〉] ~R ) | ||
| Theorem | ltsrpr 11032 | Ordering of signed reals in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ~R <R [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ~R ↔ (𝐴 +P 𝐷)<P (𝐵 +P 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | gt0srpr 11033 | Greater than zero in terms of positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (0R <R [〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ~R ↔ 𝐵<P 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 0nsr 11034 | The empty set is not a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ R | ||
| Theorem | 0r 11035 | The constant 0R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0R ∈ R | ||
| Theorem | 1sr 11036 | The constant 1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 1R ∈ R | ||
| Theorem | m1r 11037 | The constant -1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ -1R ∈ R | ||
| Theorem | addclsr 11038 | Closure of addition on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 +R 𝐵) ∈ R) | ||
| Theorem | mulclsr 11039 | Closure of multiplication on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ∈ R) | ||
| Theorem | dmaddsr 11040 | Domain of addition on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ dom +R = (R × R) | ||
| Theorem | dmmulsr 11041 | Domain of multiplication on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ dom ·R = (R × R) | ||
| Theorem | addcomsr 11042 | Addition of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 +R 𝐵) = (𝐵 +R 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addasssr 11043 | Addition of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 +R 𝐵) +R 𝐶) = (𝐴 +R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mulcomsr 11044 | Multiplication of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·R 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mulasssr 11045 | Multiplication of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ·R 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | distrsr 11046 | Multiplication of signed reals is distributive. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | m1p1sr 11047 | Minus one plus one is zero for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (-1R +R 1R) = 0R | ||
| Theorem | m1m1sr 11048 | Minus one times minus one is plus one for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (-1R ·R -1R) = 1R | ||
| Theorem | ltsosr 11049 | Signed real 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ <R Or R | ||
| Theorem | 0lt1sr 11050 | 0 is less than 1 for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0R <R 1R | ||
| Theorem | 1ne0sr 11051 | 1 and 0 are distinct for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 1R = 0R | ||
| Theorem | 0idsr 11052 | The signed real number 0 is an identity element for addition of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R 0R) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 1idsr 11053 | 1 is an identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 1R) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 00sr 11054 | A signed real times 0 is 0. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 0R) = 0R) | ||
| Theorem | ltasr 11055 | Ordering property of addition. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ R → (𝐴 <R 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +R 𝐴) <R (𝐶 +R 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pn0sr 11056 | A signed real plus its negative is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R (𝐴 ·R -1R)) = 0R) | ||
| Theorem | negexsr 11057* | Existence of negative signed real. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 +R 𝑥) = 0R) | ||
| Theorem | recexsrlem 11058* | The reciprocal of a positive signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (0R <R 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R) | ||
| Theorem | addgt0sr 11059 | The sum of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 +R 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mulgt0sr 11060 | The product of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | sqgt0sr 11061 | The square of a nonzero signed real is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | recexsr 11062* | The reciprocal of a nonzero signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R) | ||
| Theorem | mappsrpr 11063 | Mapping from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R (𝐶 +R [〈𝐴, 1P〉] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P) | ||
| Theorem | ltpsrpr 11064 | Mapping of order from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 +R [〈𝐴, 1P〉] ~R ) <R (𝐶 +R [〈𝐵, 1P〉] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴<P 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | map2psrpr 11065* | Equivalence for positive signed real. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐶 +R [〈𝑥, 1P〉] ~R ) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | supsrlem 11066* | Lemma for supremum theorem. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑤 ∣ (𝐶 +R [〈𝑤, 1P〉] ~R ) ∈ 𝐴} & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | supsr 11067* | A nonempty, bounded set of signed reals has a supremum. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧))) | ||
| Syntax | cc 11068 | Class of complex numbers. |
| class ℂ | ||
| Syntax | cr 11069 | Class of real numbers. |
| class ℝ | ||
| Syntax | cc0 11070 | Extend class notation to include the complex number 0. |
| class 0 | ||
| Syntax | c1 11071 | Extend class notation to include the complex number 1. |
| class 1 | ||
| Syntax | ci 11072 | Extend class notation to include the complex number i. |
| class i | ||
| Syntax | caddc 11073 | Addition on complex numbers. |
| class + | ||
| Syntax | cltrr 11074 | 'Less than' predicate (defined over real subset of complex numbers). |
| class <ℝ | ||
| Syntax | cmul 11075 | Multiplication on complex numbers. The token · is a center dot. |
| class · | ||
| Definition | df-c 11076 | Define the set of complex numbers. The 23 axioms for complex numbers start at axresscn 11103. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℂ = (R × R) | ||
| Definition | df-0 11077 | Define the complex number 0. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 0 = 〈0R, 0R〉 | ||
| Definition | df-1 11078 | Define the complex number 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 1 = 〈1R, 0R〉 | ||
| Definition | df-i 11079 | Define the complex number i (the imaginary unit). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ i = 〈0R, 1R〉 | ||
| Definition | df-r 11080 | Define the set of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℝ = (R × {0R}) | ||
| Definition | df-add 11081* | Define addition over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ + = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = 〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑢, 𝑓〉) ∧ 𝑧 = 〈(𝑤 +R 𝑢), (𝑣 +R 𝑓)〉))} | ||
| Definition | df-mul 11082* | Define multiplication over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ · = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = 〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑢, 𝑓〉) ∧ 𝑧 = 〈((𝑤 ·R 𝑢) +R (-1R ·R (𝑣 ·R 𝑓))), ((𝑣 ·R 𝑢) +R (𝑤 ·R 𝑓))〉))} | ||
| Definition | df-lt 11083* | Define 'less than' on the real subset of complex numbers. Proofs should typically use < instead; see df-ltxr 11218. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ <ℝ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 0R〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑤, 0R〉) ∧ 𝑧 <R 𝑤))} | ||
| Theorem | opelcn 11084 | Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ ℂ ↔ (𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R)) | ||
| Theorem | opelreal 11085 | Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (〈𝐴, 0R〉 ∈ ℝ ↔ 𝐴 ∈ R) | ||
| Theorem | elreal 11086* | Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ R 〈𝑥, 0R〉 = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elreal2 11087 | Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), 0R〉)) | ||
| Theorem | 0ncn 11088 | The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ ℂ | ||
| Theorem | ltrelre 11089 | 'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ <ℝ ⊆ (ℝ × ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | addcnsr 11090 | Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 + 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = 〈(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)〉) | ||
| Theorem | mulcnsr 11091 | Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = 〈((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))〉) | ||
| Theorem | eqresr 11092 | Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 0R〉 = 〈𝐵, 0R〉 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | addresr 11093 | Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (〈𝐴, 0R〉 + 〈𝐵, 0R〉) = 〈(𝐴 +R 𝐵), 0R〉) | ||
| Theorem | mulresr 11094 | Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (〈𝐴, 0R〉 · 〈𝐵, 0R〉) = 〈(𝐴 ·R 𝐵), 0R〉) | ||
| Theorem | ltresr 11095 | Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (〈𝐴, 0R〉 <ℝ 〈𝐵, 0R〉 ↔ 𝐴 <R 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ltresr2 11096 | Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) <R (1st ‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | dfcnqs 11097 | Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in ℂ from those in R. The trick involves qsid 8758, which shows that the coset of the converse membership relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that ℂ is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 11076), and allows to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ℂ = ((R × R) / ◡ E ) | ||
| Theorem | addcnsrec 11098 | Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 11097 and mulcnsrec 11099. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉]◡ E + [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉]◡ E ) = [〈(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)〉]◡ E ) | ||
| Theorem | mulcnsrec 11099 |
Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for
operation laws. The trick involves ecid 8757,
which shows that the coset of
the converse membership relation (which is not an equivalence relation)
leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 11097.
Note: This is the last lemma (from which the axioms will be derived) in the construction of real and complex numbers. The construction starts at cnpi 10799. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉]◡ E · [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉]◡ E ) = [〈((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))〉]◡ E ) | ||
| Theorem | axaddf 11100 | Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 11106. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 11149. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |