Theorem ltaddpr 11038

Description: The sum of two positive reals is greater than one of them. Proposition 9-3.5(iii) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ltaddpr	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → 𝐴<P (𝐴 +P 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ltaddpr

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑤 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prn0 10993	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
2		n0 4307	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
3	1, 2	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	adantl 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
5		addclpr 11022	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∈ P)
6		df-plp 10987	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ +P = (𝑤 ∈ P, 𝑣 ∈ P ↦ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑣 𝑥 = (𝑦 +Q 𝑧)})
7		addclnq 10949	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Q ∧ 𝑧 ∈ Q) → (𝑦 +Q 𝑧) ∈ Q)
8	6, 7	genpprecl 11005	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
9	8	imp 412	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵))
10		elprnq 10995	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (((𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∈ P ∧ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)) → (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ Q)
11		addnqf 10952	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ +Q :(Q × Q)⟶Q
12	11	fdmi 6721	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ dom +Q = (Q × Q)
13		0nnq 10928	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ Q
14	12, 13	ndmovrcl 7606	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ Q → (𝑥 ∈ Q ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Q))
15		ltaddnq 10978	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Q ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Q) → 𝑥 <Q (𝑥 +Q 𝑦))
16	10, 14, 15	3syl 19	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (((𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∈ P ∧ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)) → 𝑥 <Q (𝑥 +Q 𝑦))
17		prcdnq 10997	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (((𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∈ P ∧ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)) → (𝑥 <Q (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
18	16, 17	mpd 16	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∈ P ∧ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵))
19	5, 9, 18	syl2an2r 698	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵))
20	19	exp32 426	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵))))
21	20	com23 87	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵))))
22	21	alrimdv 1962	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵))))
23		df-ss 3923	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
24	22, 23	imbitrrdi 255	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
25		vex 3461	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
26	25	prlem934 11037	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴)
27	26	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴)
28		eleq2 2854	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵) → ((𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
29	28	biimprcd 253	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵) → (𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵) → (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴))
30	29	con3d 153	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ (𝐴 +P 𝐵) → (¬ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
31	8, 30	syl6 36	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵))))
32	31	expd 421	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (¬ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))))
33	32	com34 92	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))))
34	33	rexlimdv 3166	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑥 +Q 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵))))
35	27, 34	mpd 16	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
36	24, 35	jcad 522	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵))))
37		dfpss2 4043	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
38	36, 37	imbitrrdi 255	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
39	38	exlimdv 1966	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
40	4, 39	mpd 16	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 +P 𝐵))
41		ltprord 11034	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ∈ P) → (𝐴<P (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
42	5, 41	syldan 603	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → (𝐴<P (𝐴 +P 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 +P 𝐵)))
43	40, 42	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ P ∧ 𝐵 ∈ P) → 𝐴<P (𝐴 +P 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960  ∃wrex 3091   ⊆ wss 3906   ⊊ wpss 3907  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5111   × cxp 5661  (class class class)co 7419  Qcnq 10856   +_Q cplq 10859   <_Q cltq 10862  Pcnp 10863   +_P cpp 10865  <_P cltp 10867

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742  ax-inf2 9617

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-int 4915  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-tr 5221  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-pred 6306  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-om 7869  df-1st 7992  df-2nd 7993  df-frecs 8284  df-wrecs 8315  df-recs 8364  df-rdg 8403  df-1o 8459  df-oadd 8463  df-omul 8464  df-er 8700  df-ni 10876  df-pli 10877  df-mi 10878  df-lti 10879  df-plpq 10912  df-mpq 10913  df-ltpq 10914  df-enq 10915  df-nq 10916  df-erq 10917  df-plq 10918  df-mq 10919  df-1nq 10920  df-rq 10921  df-ltnq 10922  df-np 10985  df-plp 10987  df-ltp 10989

This theorem is used by:  ltaddpr2  11039  ltexprlem7  11046  ltaprlem  11048  0lt1sr  11099  mappsrpr  11112