Theorem opabdm 32539

Description: Domain of an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabdm	⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem opabdm

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dm 5648	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
2		nfopab1 5177	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
3	2	nfeq2 2909	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
4		nfopab2 5178	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
5	4	nfeq2 2909	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
6		df-br 5108	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
7		eleq2 2817	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))
8		opabidw 5484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
9	7, 8	bitrdi 287	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ 𝜑))
10	6, 9	bitrid 283	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑))
11	5, 10	exbid 2224	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑))
12	3, 11	abbid 2797	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑})
13	1, 12	eqtrid 2776	1 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707  ⟨cop 4595   class class class wbr 5107  {copab 5169  dom cdm 5638

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-dm 5648

This theorem is referenced by:  fpwrelmapffslem  32655