P. 322 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 32101-32200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cnlnadjlem7 32101*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32104. Helper lemma to show that 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cnlnadjlem8 32102*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32104. 𝐹 is continuous. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ContOp
Theorem	cnlnadjlem9 32103*	Lemma for cnlnadji 32104. 𝐹 provides an example showing the existence of a continuous linear adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ ℋ ↦ ((𝑇‘𝑔) ·ih 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑤 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑣) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑣 ·ih 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℋ ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑧) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑧))
Theorem	cnlnadji 32104*	Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))
Theorem	cnlnadjeui 32105*	Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ LinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ContOp    ⇒   ⊢ ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦))
Theorem	cnlnadjeu 32106*	Every continuous linear operator has a unique adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃!𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)))
Theorem	cnlnadj 32107*	Every continuous linear operator has an adjoint. Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) → ∃𝑡 ∈ (LinOp ∩ ContOp)∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑦) = (𝑥 ·ih (𝑡‘𝑦)))
Theorem	cnlnssadj 32108	Every continuous linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (LinOp ∩ ContOp) ⊆ dom adjℎ
Theorem	bdopssadj 32109	Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ BndLinOp ⊆ dom adjℎ
Theorem	bdopadj 32110	Every bounded linear Hilbert space operator has an adjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ)
Theorem	adjbdln 32111	The adjoint of a bounded linear operator is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp)
Theorem	adjbdlnb 32112	An operator is bounded and linear iff its adjoint is. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp)
Theorem	adjbd1o 32113	The mapping of adjoints of bounded linear operators is one-to-one onto. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (adjℎ ↾ BndLinOp):BndLinOp–1-1-onto→BndLinOp
Theorem	adjlnop 32114	The adjoint of an operator is linear. Proposition 1 of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ → (adjℎ‘𝑇) ∈ LinOp)
Theorem	adjsslnop 32115	Every operator with an adjoint is linear. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom adjℎ ⊆ LinOp
Theorem	nmopadjlei 32116	Property of the norm of an adjoint. Part of proof of Theorem 3.10 of [Beran] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normℎ‘((adjℎ‘𝑇)‘𝐴)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑇) · (normℎ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	nmopadjlem 32117	Lemma for nmopadji 32118. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘𝑇)
Theorem	nmopadji 32118	Property of the norm of an adjoint. Theorem 3.11(v) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(adjℎ‘𝑇)) = (normop‘𝑇)
Theorem	adjeq0 32119	An operator is zero iff its adjoint is zero. Theorem 3.11(i) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 = 0hop ↔ (adjℎ‘𝑇) = 0hop )
Theorem	adjmul 32120	The adjoint of the scalar product of an operator. Theorem 3.11(ii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝐴 ·op 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·op (adjℎ‘𝑇)))
Theorem	adjadd 32121	The adjoint of the sum of two operators. Theorem 3.11(iii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ dom adjℎ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ dom adjℎ) → (adjℎ‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑆) +op (adjℎ‘𝑇)))
Theorem	nmoptrii 32122	Triangle inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) + (normop‘𝑇))
Theorem	nmopcoi 32123	Upper bound for the norm of the composition of two bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) ≤ ((normop‘𝑆) · (normop‘𝑇))
Theorem	bdophsi 32124	The sum of two bounded linear operators is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 +op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	bdophdi 32125	The difference between two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 −op 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	bdopcoi 32126	The composition of two bounded linear operators is bounded. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	nmoptri2i 32127	Triangle-type inequality for the norms of bounded linear operators. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ ((normop‘𝑆) − (normop‘𝑇)) ≤ (normop‘(𝑆 +op 𝑇))
Theorem	adjcoi 32128	The adjoint of a composition of bounded linear operators. Theorem 3.11(viii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 ∈ BndLinOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (adjℎ‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑇)) = ((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑆))
Theorem	nmopcoadji 32129	The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘((adjℎ‘𝑇) ∘ 𝑇)) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2)
Theorem	nmopcoadj2i 32130	The norm of an operator composed with its adjoint. Part of Theorem 3.11(vi) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘(𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇))) = ((normop‘𝑇)↑2)
Theorem	nmopcoadj0i 32131	An operator composed with its adjoint is zero iff the operator is zero. Theorem 3.11(vii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ BndLinOp    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∘ (adjℎ‘𝑇)) = 0hop ↔ 𝑇 = 0hop )
20.6.13  Quantum computation error bound theorem
Theorem	unierri 32132	If we approximate a chain of unitary transformations (quantum computer gates) 𝐹, 𝐺 by other unitary transformations 𝑆, 𝑇, the error increases at most additively. Equation 4.73 of [NielsenChuang] p. 195. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ UniOp    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ UniOp    ⇒   ⊢ (normop‘((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) −op (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇))) ≤ ((normop‘(𝐹 −op 𝑆)) + (normop‘(𝐺 −op 𝑇)))
20.6.14  Dirac bra-ket notation (cont.)
Theorem	branmfn 32133	The norm of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) = (normℎ‘𝐴))
Theorem	brabn 32134	The bra of a vector is a bounded functional. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (normfn‘(bra‘𝐴)) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rnbra 32135	The set of bras equals the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ran bra = (LinFn ∩ ContFn)
Theorem	bra11 32136	The bra function maps vectors one-to-one onto the set of continuous linear functionals. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ bra: ℋ–1-1-onto→(LinFn ∩ ContFn)
Theorem	bracnln 32137	A bra is a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (bra‘𝐴) ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn))
Theorem	cnvbraval 32138*	Value of the converse of the bra function. Based on the Riesz Lemma riesz4 32092, this very important theorem not only justifies the Dirac bra-ket notation, but allows to extract a unique vector from any continuous linear functional from which the functional can be recovered; i.e. a single vector can "store" all of the information contained in any entire continuous linear functional (mapping from ℋ to ℂ). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) = (℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦)))
Theorem	cnvbracl 32139	Closure of the converse of the bra function. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (◡bra‘𝑇) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	cnvbrabra 32140	The converse bra of the bra of a vector is the vector itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (◡bra‘(bra‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bracnvbra 32141	The bra of the converse bra of a continuous linear functional. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → (bra‘(◡bra‘𝑇)) = 𝑇)
Theorem	bracnlnval 32142*	The vector that a continuous linear functional is the bra of. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn) → 𝑇 = (bra‘(℩𝑦 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑇‘𝑥) = (𝑥 ·ih 𝑦))))
Theorem	cnvbramul 32143	Multiplication property of the converse bra function. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (LinFn ∩ ContFn)) → (◡bra‘(𝐴 ·fn 𝑇)) = ((∗‘𝐴) ·ℎ (◡bra‘𝑇)))
Theorem	kbass1 32144	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩ = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩), i.e., the juxtaposition of an outer product with a ket equals a bra juxtaposed with an inner product. Since ⟨𝐵 ∣ 𝐶⟩ is a complex number, it is the first argument in the inner product ·ℎ that it is mapped to, although in Dirac notation it is placed after the ket. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) = (((bra‘𝐵)‘𝐶) ·ℎ 𝐴))
Theorem	kbass2 32145	Dirac bra-ket associative law (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩)⟨𝐶 ∣ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ), i.e., the juxtaposition of an inner product with a bra equals a ket juxtaposed with an outer product. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶)) = ((bra‘𝐴) ∘ (𝐵 ketbra 𝐶)))
Theorem	kbass3 32146	Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = (⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐷⟩. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) ·fn (bra‘𝐶))‘𝐷))
Theorem	kbass4 32147	Dirac bra-ket associative law ⟨𝐴 ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝐴 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐵⟩⟨𝐶 ∣ 𝐷⟩). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → (((bra‘𝐴)‘𝐵) · ((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷)) = ((bra‘𝐴)‘(((bra‘𝐶)‘𝐷) ·ℎ 𝐵)))
Theorem	kbass5 32148	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = (( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ ) ∣ 𝐶⟩)⟨𝐷 ∣. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵)‘𝐶) ketbra 𝐷))
Theorem	kbass6 32149	Dirac bra-ket associative law ( ∣ 𝐴⟩⟨𝐵 ∣ )( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ ) = ∣ 𝐴⟩(⟨𝐵 ∣ ( ∣ 𝐶⟩⟨𝐷 ∣ )). (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℋ)) → ((𝐴 ketbra 𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)) = (𝐴 ketbra (◡bra‘((bra‘𝐵) ∘ (𝐶 ketbra 𝐷)))))
20.6.15  Positive operators (cont.)
Theorem	leopg 32150*	Ordering relation for positive operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈 −op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
Theorem	leop 32151*	Ordering relation for operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈 −op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leop2 32152*	Ordering relation for operators. Definition of operator ordering in [Young] p. 141. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ≤ ((𝑈‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leop3 32153	Operator ordering in terms of a positive operator. Definition of operator ordering in [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝑈 −op 𝑇)))
Theorem	leoppos 32154*	Binary relation defining a positive operator. Definition VI.1 of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ ((𝑇‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
Theorem	leoprf2 32155	The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇)
Theorem	leoprf 32156	The ordering relation for operators is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 𝑇 ≤op 𝑇)
Theorem	leopsq 32157	The square of a Hermitian operator is positive. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ HrmOp → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	0leop 32158	The zero operator is a positive operator. (The literature calls it "positive", even though in some sense it is really "nonnegative".) Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0hop ≤op 0hop
Theorem	idleop 32159	The identity operator is a positive operator. Part of Example 12.2(i) in [Young] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0hop ≤op Iop
Theorem	leopadd 32160	The sum of two positive operators is positive. Exercise 1(i) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑈)) → 0hop ≤op (𝑇 +op 𝑈))
Theorem	leopmuli 32161	The scalar product of a nonnegative real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 0hop ≤op 𝑇)) → 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇))
Theorem	leopmul 32162	The scalar product of a positive real and a positive operator is a positive operator. Exercise 1(ii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 0 < 𝐴) → ( 0hop ≤op 𝑇 ↔ 0hop ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑇)))
Theorem	leopmul2i 32163	Scalar product applied to operator ordering. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (0 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → (𝐴 ·op 𝑇) ≤op (𝐴 ·op 𝑈))
Theorem	leoptri 32164	The positive operator ordering relation satisfies trichotomy. Exercise 1(iii) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) → ((𝑇 ≤op 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ≤op 𝑇) ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈))
Theorem	leoptr 32165	The positive operator ordering relation is transitive. Exercise 1(iv) of [Retherford] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ HrmOp) ∧ (𝑆 ≤op 𝑇 ∧ 𝑇 ≤op 𝑈)) → 𝑆 ≤op 𝑈)
Theorem	leopnmid 32166	A bounded Hermitian operator is less than or equal to its norm times the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ) → 𝑇 ≤op ((normop‘𝑇) ·op Iop ))
Theorem	nmopleid 32167	A nonzero, bounded Hermitian operator divided by its norm is less than or equal to the identity operator. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑇 ≠ 0hop ) → ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇) ≤op Iop )
Theorem	opsqrlem1 32168*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (normop‘𝑇) ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 0hop ≤op 𝑇    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((1 / (normop‘𝑇)) ·op 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑢 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑢 ∧ (𝑢 ∘ 𝑢) = 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ≠ 0hop → ∃𝑣 ∈ HrmOp ( 0hop ≤op 𝑣 ∧ (𝑣 ∘ 𝑣) = 𝑇))
Theorem	opsqrlem2 32169*	Lemma for opsqri . 𝐹‘𝑁 is the recursive function An (starting at n=1 instead of 0) of Theorem 9.4-2 of [Kreyszig] p. 476. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘1) = 0hop
Theorem	opsqrlem3 32170*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝐻 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))))
Theorem	opsqrlem4 32171*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:ℕ⟶HrmOp
Theorem	opsqrlem5 32172*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝐹‘𝑁) +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op ((𝐹‘𝑁) ∘ (𝐹‘𝑁))))))
Theorem	opsqrlem6 32173*	Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ≤op Iop    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤op Iop )
20.6.16  Projectors as operators
Theorem	pjhmopi 32174	A projector is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp
Theorem	pjlnopi 32175	A projector is a linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ LinOp
Theorem	pjnmopi 32176	The operator norm of a projector on a nonzero closed subspace is one. Part of Theorem 26.1 of [Halmos] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 ≠ 0ℋ → (normop‘(projℎ‘𝐻)) = 1)
Theorem	pjbdlni 32177	A projector is a bounded linear operator. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ BndLinOp
Theorem	pjhmop 32178	A projection is a Hermitian operator. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻) ∈ HrmOp)
Theorem	hmopidmchi 32179	An idempotent Hermitian operator generates a closed subspace. Part of proof of Theorem of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝑇 ∈ Cℋ
Theorem	hmopidmpji 32180	An idempotent Hermitian operator is a projection operator. Theorem 26.4 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Halmos seems to omit the proof that 𝐻 is a closed subspace, which is not trivial as hmopidmchi 32179 shows.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp    &   ⊢ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = (projℎ‘ran 𝑇)
Theorem	hmopidmch 32181	An idempotent Hermitian operator generates a closed subspace. Part of proof of Theorem of [AkhiezerGlazman] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇) → ran 𝑇 ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	hmopidmpj 32182	An idempotent Hermitian operator is a projection operator. Theorem 26.4 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ HrmOp ∧ (𝑇 ∘ 𝑇) = 𝑇) → 𝑇 = (projℎ‘ran 𝑇))
Theorem	pjsdii 32183	Distributive law for Hilbert space operator sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑆) +op ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	pjddii 32184	Distributive law for Hilbert space operator difference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (𝑆 −op 𝑇)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑆) −op ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑇))
Theorem	pjsdi2i 32185	Chained distributive law for Hilbert space operator difference. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆: ℋ⟶ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑆) +op (𝑅 ∘ 𝑇)) → (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ (𝑆 +op 𝑇)) = ((((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑆) +op (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑇)))
Theorem	pjcoi 32186	Composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = ((projℎ‘𝐺)‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjcocli 32187	Closure of composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐺)
Theorem	pjcohcli 32188	Closure of composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	pjadjcoi 32189	Adjoint of composition of projections. Special case of Theorem 3.11(viii) of [Beran] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻))‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·ih (((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐺))‘𝐵)))
Theorem	pjcofni 32190	Functionality of composition of projections. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻)) Fn ℋ
Theorem	pjss1coi 32191	Subset relationship for projections. Theorem 4.5(i)<->(iii) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐺)) = (projℎ‘𝐺))
Theorem	pjss2coi 32192	Subset relationship for projections. Theorem 4.5(i)<->(ii) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻)) = (projℎ‘𝐺))
Theorem	pjssmi 32193	Projection meet property. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 66. Also Theorem 4.5(i)->(iv) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (𝐻 ⊆ 𝐺 → (((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘(𝐺 ∩ (⊥‘𝐻)))‘𝐴)))
Theorem	pjssge0i 32194	Theorem 4.5(iv)->(v) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘(𝐺 ∩ (⊥‘𝐻)))‘𝐴) → 0 ≤ ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ·ih 𝐴)))
Theorem	pjdifnormi 32195	Theorem 4.5(v)<->(vi) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (0 ≤ ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ·ih 𝐴) ↔ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ≤ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴))))
Theorem	pjnormssi 32196*	Theorem 4.5(i)<->(vi) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝑥)) ≤ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝑥)))
Theorem	pjorthcoi 32197	Composition of projections of orthogonal subspaces. Part (i)->(iia) of Theorem 27.4 of [Halmos] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐻) → ((projℎ‘𝐺) ∘ (projℎ‘𝐻)) = 0hop )
Theorem	pjscji 32198	The projection of orthogonal subspaces is the sum of the projections. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐻) → (projℎ‘(𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝐻)) = ((projℎ‘𝐺) +op (projℎ‘𝐻)))
Theorem	pjssumi 32199	The projection on a subspace sum is the sum of the projections. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐻) → (projℎ‘(𝐺 +ℋ 𝐻)) = ((projℎ‘𝐺) +op (projℎ‘𝐻)))
Theorem	pjssposi 32200*	Projector ordering can be expressed by the subset relationship between their projection subspaces. (i)<->(iii) of Theorem 29.2 of [Halmos] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ ((((projℎ‘𝐻) −op (projℎ‘𝐺))‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻)