Theorem ralopabb 42162

Description: Restricted universal quantification over an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by RP, 25-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralopabb.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
ralopabb.p	⊢ (𝑜 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralopabb	⊢ (∀𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑜,𝑂   𝑥,𝑜,𝑦   𝜑,𝑜   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦   𝜒,𝑜

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑜)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑂(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ralopabb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2nalexn 1831	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜒))
2		ralopabb.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
3		ralopabb.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	notbid 318	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒))
5	2, 4	rexopabb 5529	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
6		annim 405	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜒))
7	6	2exbii 1852	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜒))
8	5, 7	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜒))
9		rexnal 3101	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓)
10	1, 8, 9	3bitr2ri 300	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜒))
11	10	con4bii 321	1 ⊢ (∀𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜒))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397  ∀wal 1540   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1782  ∀wral 3062  ∃wrex 3071  ⟨cop 4635  {copab 5211

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pr 5428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3779  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-opab 5212

This theorem is referenced by: (None)