P. 429 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42801-42900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	naddwordnexlem3 42801*	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, every natural sum of 𝐴 with a natural number is less that 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐴 +no 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	oawordex3 42802*	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, some ordinal sum of 𝐴 is equal to 𝐵. This is a specialization of oawordex 8571. (Contributed by RP, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	naddwordnexlem4 42803*	When 𝐴 is the sum of a limit ordinal (or zero) and a natural number and 𝐵 is the sum of a larger limit ordinal and a smaller natural number, there exists a product with omega such that the ordinal sum with 𝐴 is less than or equal to 𝐵 while the natural sum is larger than 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 15-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((ω ·o 𝐶) +o 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = ((ω ·o 𝐷) +o 𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐶 +o 𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)((𝐶 +o 𝑥) = 𝐷 ∧ (𝐴 +o (ω ·o 𝑥)) ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 +no (ω ·o 𝑥))))
Theorem	ordsssucim 42804	If an ordinal is less than or equal to the successor of another, then the first is either less than or equal to the second or the first is equal to the successor of the second. Theorem 1 in Grzegorz Bancerek, "Epsilon Numbers and Cantor Normal Form", Formalized Mathematics, Vol. 17, No. 4, Pages 249–256, 2009. DOI: 10.2478/v10037-009-0032-8 See also ordsssucb 42736 for a biimplication when 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	insucid 42805	The intersection of a class and its successor is itself. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ suc 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	om2 42806	Two ways to double an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ·o 2o))
Theorem	oaltom 42807	Multiplication eventually dominates addition. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((1o ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 +o 𝐴) ∈ (𝐵 ·o 𝐴)))
Theorem	oe2 42808	Two ways to square an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ·o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ↑o 2o))
Theorem	omltoe 42809	Exponentiation eventually dominates multiplication. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((1o ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ·o 𝐴) ∈ (𝐵 ↑o 𝐴)))
21.34.3  Surreal Contributions
Theorem	abeqabi 42810	Generalized condition for a class abstraction to be equal to some class. (Contributed by RP, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	abpr 42811*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a pair. (Contributed by RP, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌, 𝑍} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑍)))
Theorem	abtp 42812*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a triple. (Contributed by RP, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑍)))
Theorem	ralopabb 42813*	Restricted universal quantification over an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by RP, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝑜 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	fpwfvss 42814	Functions into a powerset always have values which are subsets. This is dependant on our convention when the argument is not part of the domain. (Contributed by RP, 13-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝒫 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	sdomne0 42815	A class that strictly dominates any set is not empty. (Suggested by SN, 14-Jan-2025.) (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≺ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	sdomne0d 42816	A class that strictly dominates any set is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	safesnsupfiss 42817	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	safesnsupfiub 42818*	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ if (𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	safesnsupfidom1o 42819	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵) ≼ 1o)
Theorem	safesnsupfilb 42820*	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵))∀𝑦 ∈ if (𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	isoeq145d 42821	Equality deduction for isometries. (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	resisoeq45d 42822	Equality deduction for equally restricted isometries. (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	negslem1 42823	An equivalence between identically restricted order-reversing self-isometries. (Contributed by RP, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, ◡𝑅(𝐴, 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Isom 𝑅, ◡𝑅(𝐵, 𝐵)))
Theorem	nvocnvb 42824*	Equivalence to saying the converse of an involution is the function itself. (Contributed by RP, 13-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = 𝑥))
Theorem	rp-brsslt 42825*	Binary relation form of a relation, <, which has been extended from relation 𝑅 to subsets of class 𝑆. Usually, we will assume 𝑅 Or 𝑆. Definition in [Alling], p. 2. Generalization of brsslt 27711. (Originally by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.) (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	nla0002 42826*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is less than any subset. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ < 𝐴)
Theorem	nla0003 42827*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is greater than any subset. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < ∅)
Theorem	nla0001 42828*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is less than itself. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ < ∅)
Theorem	faosnf0.11b 42829*	𝐵 is called a non-limit ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.) Alling, Norman L. "Fundamentals of Analysis Over Surreal Numbers Fields." The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 19, no. 3 (1989): 565-73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44237243.
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	dfno2 42830	A surreal number, in the functional sign expansion representation, is a function which maps from an ordinal into a set of two possible signs. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ No = {𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (On × {1o, 2o}) ∣ (Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ On)}
Theorem	onnog 42831	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ No )
Theorem	onnobdayg 42832	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number of that birthday. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bdaybndex 42833	Bounds formed from the birthday are surreal numbers. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → (𝐵 × {𝐶}) ∈ No )
Theorem	bdaybndbday 42834	Bounds formed from the birthday have the same birthday. (Contributed by RP, 30-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐵 × {𝐶})) = ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	onno 42835	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No )
Theorem	onnoi 42836	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	0no 42837	Ordinal zero maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ No
Theorem	1no 42838	Ordinal one maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (1o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	2no 42839	Ordinal two maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (2o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	3no 42840	Ordinal three maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (3o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	4no 42841	Ordinal four maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (4o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	fnimafnex 42842	The functional image of a function value exists. (Contributed by RP, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝐺‘𝐴)) ∈ V
21.34.4  Short Studies
Theorem	nlimsuc 42843	A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ Lim suc 𝐴)
Theorem	nlim1NEW 42844	1 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 1o
Theorem	nlim2NEW 42845	2 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 2o
Theorem	nlim3 42846	3 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 3o
Theorem	nlim4 42847	4 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 4o
Theorem	oa1un 42848	Given 𝐴 ∈ On, let 𝐴 +o 1o be defined to be the union of 𝐴 and {𝐴}. Compare with oa1suc 8545. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
Theorem	oa1cl 42849	𝐴 +o 1o is in On. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) ∈ On)
Theorem	0finon 42850	0 is a finite ordinal. See peano1 7888. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	1finon 42851	1 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8654. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 1o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	2finon 42852	2 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8654. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 2o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	3finon 42853	3 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8654. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 3o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	4finon 42854	4 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8654. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 4o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	finona1cl 42855	The finite ordinals are closed under the add one operation. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (On ∩ Fin) → (𝑁 +o 1o) ∈ (On ∩ Fin))
Theorem	finonex 42856	The finite ordinals are a set. See also onprc 7774 and fiprc 9063 for proof that On and Fin are proper classes. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (On ∩ Fin) ∈ V
Theorem	fzunt 42857	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Suggested by NM, 21-Jul-2005.) (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)) → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntd 42858	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzunt1d 42859	Union of two overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntgd 42860	Union of two adjacent or overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ (𝐿 + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
21.34.4.1  Additional work on conditional logical operator
Theorem	ifpan123g 42861	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∧ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ (((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜂))))
Theorem	ifpan23 42862	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜏)) ↔ if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃), (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpdfor2 42863	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifporcor 42864	Corollary of commutation of or. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpdfan2 42865	Define and with conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpancor 42866	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfor 42867	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator and true. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfan 42868	Define and with conditional logic operator and false. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpbi2 42869	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜑, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi3 42870	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim1 42871	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(¬ 𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot 42872	Restate negated wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊥, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpid2 42873	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpim2 42874	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ⊤, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi23 42875	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜏, 𝜑, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜏, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor 42876	Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpbicor 42877	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpxorcor 42878	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi1 42879	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpnot23 42880	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnotnotb 42881	Factor conditional logic operator over negation in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnorcor 42882	Corollary of commutation of nor. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnancor 42883	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot23b 42884	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor2 42885	Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpnot23c 42886	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnot23d 42887	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpdfnan 42888	Define nand as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpdfxor 42889	Define xor as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpbi12 42890	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpbi13 42891	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜏, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜏, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi123 42892	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)))
Theorem	ifpidg 42893	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpid3g 42894	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpid2g 42895	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpid1g 42896	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim23g 42897	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpim3 42898	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnim1 42899	Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpim4 42900	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))