Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rexbidv2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rexbidv2.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rexbidv2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rexbidv2.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
2 | 1 | exbidv 1925 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))) |
3 | df-rex 3069 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
4 | df-rex 3069 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3bitr4g 313 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 ∃wex 1783 ∈ wcel 2108 ∃wrex 3064 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-ex 1784 df-rex 3069 |
This theorem is referenced by: rexbidva 3224 rexeqbidv 3328 rexss 3988 exopxfr2 5742 isoini 7189 rexsupp 7969 omabs 8441 elfi2 9103 wemapsolem 9239 ltexpi 10589 rexuz 12567 ncoprmgcdne1b 16283 lpigen 20440 llyi 22533 nllyi 22534 elpi1 24114 ressupprn 30926 xrecex 31096 bnj18eq1 32807 ldual1dim 37107 pmapjat1 37794 mrefg2 40445 islssfg2 40812 fourierdlem71 43608 hoiqssbl 44053 lubeldm2d 46140 glbeldm2d 46141 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |