Theorem rexbidv2 3186

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rexbidv2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexbidv2	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexbidv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexbidv2.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
2	1	exbidv 1956	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
3		df-rex 3091	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
4		df-rex 3091	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
5	2, 3, 4	3bitr4g 317	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃wrex 3090

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-ex 1813  df-rex 3091

This theorem is used by:  rexbidva  3188  rexeqbidv  3339  iuneq12d  4985  exopxfr2  5832  isoini  7377  rexsupp  8237  omabs  8698  elfi2  9443  wemapsolem  9581  ltexpi  11026  rexuz  13065  ncoprmgcdne1b  16869  lpigen  21710  llyi  23848  nllyi  23849  elpi1  25421  ressupprn  33380  xrecex  33582  constrcbvlem  34498  bnj18eq1  35668  ldual1dim  40489  pmapjat1  41176  mrefg2  43984  islssfg2  44339  fourierdlem71  47460  hoiqssbl  47908  reuxfr1dd  50248  lubeldm2d  50403  glbeldm2d  50404