Theorem rexbidv2 3160

Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rexbidv2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexbidv2	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexbidv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rexbidv2.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
2	1	exbidv 1921	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
3		df-rex 3061	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
4		df-rex 3061	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
5	2, 3, 4	3bitr4g 314	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3060

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-ex 1780  df-rex 3061

This theorem is referenced by:  rexbidva  3162  rexeqbidv  3326  rexssOLD  4036  iuneq12d  4997  exopxfr2  5824  isoini  7331  rexsupp  8181  omabs  8663  elfi2  9426  wemapsolem  9564  ltexpi  10916  rexuz  12914  ncoprmgcdne1b  16669  lpigen  21296  llyi  23412  nllyi  23413  elpi1  24996  ressupprn  32667  xrecex  32894  constrcbvlem  33789  bnj18eq1  34958  ldual1dim  39184  pmapjat1  39872  mrefg2  42730  islssfg2  43095  fourierdlem71  46206  hoiqssbl  46654  reuxfr1dd  48785  lubeldm2d  48932  glbeldm2d  48933