Theorem rexprg 4636

Description: Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-12 2189. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralprg.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
ralprg.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexprg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)   𝑊(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexprg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralprg.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	notbid 319	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
3		ralprg.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	notbid 319	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜒))
5	2, 4	ralprg 4635	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)))
6		ralnex 3066	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑)
7		pm4.56 996	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	bibi12i 340	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
9		notbi 320	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
10	8, 9	sylbb2 239	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
11	5, 10	syl 17	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 853   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ∀wral 3054  ∃wrex 3064  {cpr 4564

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2712

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-tru 1550  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3065  df-v 3434  df-un 3895  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565

This theorem is referenced by:  rextpg  4638  rexpr  4640  reurexprg  4643  fr2nr  5602  sgrp2nmndlem5  18898  nb3grprlem2  29475  nfrgr2v  30367  3vfriswmgrlem  30372  brfvrcld  44142  rnmptpr  45631  ldepspr  48971  zlmodzxzldeplem4  49001