Theorem rexprg 4661

Description: Convert a restricted existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2178, ax-12 2215. (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralprg.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
ralprg.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexprg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)   𝑊(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rexprg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralprg.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
3		ralprg.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜒))
5	2, 4	ralprg 4660	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)))
6		ralnex 3090	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑)
7		pm4.56 1004	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	bibi12i 342	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
9		notbi 322	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
10	8, 9	sylbb2 241	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ¬ 𝜑 ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
11	5, 10	syl 18	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  {cpr 4589

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-v 3455  df-un 3907  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590

This theorem is used by:  rextpg  4663  rexpr  4665  reurexprg  4668  fr2nr  5636  sgrp2nmndlem5  19047  nb3grprlem2  29849  nfrgr2v  30760  3vfriswmgrlem  30765  brfvrcld  44539  rnmptpr  46017  ldepspr  49411  zlmodzxzldeplem4  49441