Theorem fr2nr 5628

Description: A well-founded relation has no 2-cycle loops. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fr2nr	⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))

Proof of Theorem fr2nr

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prex 5396	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ V
2	1	a1i 11	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ V)
3		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)
4		prssi 4782	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐴)
5	4	adantl 487	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐴)
6		prnzg 4739	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝐵, 𝐶} ≠ ∅)
7	6	ad2antrl 741	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → {𝐵, 𝐶} ≠ ∅)
8		fri 5609	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((({𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) ∧ ({𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
9	2, 3, 5, 7, 8	syl22anc 852	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
10		breq2 5107	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝐵))
11	10	notbid 321	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵))
12	11	ralbidv 3186	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵))
13		breq2 5107	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝐶))
14	13	notbid 321	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶))
15	14	ralbidv 3186	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐶 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶))
16	12, 15	rexprg 4658	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶)))
17	16	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶)))
18	9, 17	mpbid 235	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶))
19		prid2g 4722	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
20	19	ad2antll 742	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
21		breq1 5106	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝑥𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
22	21	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
23	22	rspcv 3573	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵 → ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
24	20, 23	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵 → ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
25		prid1g 4721	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
26	25	ad2antrl 741	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
27		breq1 5106	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
28	27	notbid 321	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶 ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
29	28	rspcv 3573	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
30	26, 29	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
31	24, 30	orim12d 979	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐵 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝐶) → (¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
32	18, 31	mpd 16	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))
33	32	orcomd 885	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
34		ianor 997	. 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) ↔ (¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))
35	33, 34	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2956  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087  Vcvv 3451   ⊆ wss 3899  ∅c0 4279  {cpr 4586   class class class wbr 5103   Fr wfr 5601

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-fr 5604

This theorem is used by:  efrn2lp  5632  dfwe2  7788