Theorem xpcogend 15001

Description: The most interesting case of the composition of two Cartesian products. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
xpcogend.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpcogend	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem xpcogend

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brxp 5701	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
2		brxp 5701	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷))
3	2	biancomi 467	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))
4	1, 3	anbi12i 639	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
5	4	exbii 1871	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
6		an4 668	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
7	6	exbii 1871	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
8		19.42v 1976	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
9	5, 7, 8	3bitri 300	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))
10		xpcogend.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅)
11		ndisj 4326	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))
12	10, 11	sylib 221	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))
13	12	biantrud 540	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))))
14	9, 13	bitr4id 293	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦(𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷)))
15	14	opabbidv 5171	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧)} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷)})
16		df-co 5661	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥(𝐴 × 𝐵)𝑦 ∧ 𝑦(𝐶 × 𝐷)𝑧)}
17		df-xp 5658	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐷) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷)}
18	15, 16, 17	3eqtr4g 2825	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1563  ∃wex 1802   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2960   ∩ cin 3906  ∅c0 4288   class class class wbr 5105  {copab 5167   × cxp 5650   ∘ ccom 5656

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5395

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1566  df-fal 1576  df-ex 1803  df-sb 2094  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3418  df-v 3459  df-dif 3910  df-un 3912  df-in 3914  df-ss 3924  df-nul 4289  df-if 4484  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-op 4592  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-xp 5658  df-co 5661

This theorem is referenced by:  xpcoidgend  15002