| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 150 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31005) |
(31006-32528) |
(32529-50153) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | s7f1o 14901 | A length 7 word with mutually different symbols is a one-to-one function onto the set of the symbols. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐸 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐺)) ∧ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐶 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐺))) ∧ ((𝐷 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐷 ≠ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)))) → (𝐾 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷𝐸𝐹𝐺”〉 → 𝐾:(0..^7)–1-1-onto→(({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∪ {𝐷}) ∪ {𝐸, 𝐹, 𝐺}))) | ||
| Theorem | s3sndisj 14902* | The singletons consisting of length 3 strings which have distinct third symbols are disjunct. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → Disj 𝑐 ∈ 𝑍 {〈“𝐴𝐵𝑐”〉}) | ||
| Theorem | s3iunsndisj 14903* | The union of singletons consisting of length 3 strings which have distinct first and third symbols are disjunct. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → Disj 𝑎 ∈ 𝑌 ∪ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑍 ∖ {𝑎}){〈“𝑎𝐵𝑐”〉}) | ||
| Theorem | ofccat 14904 | Letterwise operations on word concatenations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Word 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ Word 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐸) = (♯‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐹) = (♯‘𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐸 ++ 𝐹) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ++ 𝐻)) = ((𝐸 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ++ (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | ofs1 14905 | Letterwise operations on a single letter word. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇) → (〈“𝐴”〉 ∘f 𝑅〈“𝐵”〉) = 〈“(𝐴𝑅𝐵)”〉) | ||
| Theorem | ofs2 14906 | Letterwise operations on a double letter word. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑇)) → (〈“𝐴𝐵”〉 ∘f 𝑅〈“𝐶𝐷”〉) = 〈“(𝐴𝑅𝐶)(𝐵𝑅𝐷)”〉) | ||
A relation, 𝑅, has the reflexive property if 𝐴𝑅𝐴 holds whenever 𝐴 is an element which could be related by the relation, namely, an element of its domain or range. Eliminating dummy variables, we see that a segment of the identity relation must be a subset of the relation, or ( I ↾ (ran 𝑅 ∪ dom 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅. See idref 7101. A relation, 𝑅, has the transitive property if 𝐴𝑅𝐶 holds whenever there exists an intermediate value 𝐵 such that both 𝐴𝑅𝐵 and 𝐵𝑅𝐶 hold. This can be expressed without dummy variables as (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅. See cotr 6077. The transitive closure of a relation, (t+‘𝑅), is the smallest superset of the relation which has the transitive property. Likewise, the reflexive-transitive closure, (t*‘𝑅), is the smallest superset which has both the reflexive and transitive properties. Not to be confused with the transitive closure of a set, trcl 9649, which is a closure relative to a different transitive property, df-tr 5208. | ||
| Theorem | coss12d 14907 | Subset deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | trrelssd 14908 | The composition of subclasses of a transitive relation is a subclass of that relation. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∘ 𝑇) ⊆ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | xpcogend 14909 | The most interesting case of the composition of two Cartesian products. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | xpcoidgend 14910 | If two classes are not disjoint, then the composition of their Cartesian product with itself is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cotr2g 14911* | Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr2 14912 for the main application. (Contributed by RP, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷 & ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐸 & ⊢ ran 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐹 ((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cotr2 14912* | Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Special instance of cotr2g 14911. (Contributed by RP, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐴 & ⊢ (dom 𝑅 ∩ ran 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵 & ⊢ ran 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | cotr3 14913* | Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. (Contributed by RP, 22-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = dom 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ran 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | coemptyd 14914 | Deduction about composition of classes with no relational content in common. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) = ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | xptrrel 14915 | The cross product is always a transitive relation. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 0trrel 14916 | The empty class is a transitive relation. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (∅ ∘ ∅) ⊆ ∅ | ||
| Theorem | cleq1lem 14917 | Equality implies bijection. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | cleq1 14918* | Equality of relations implies equality of closures. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝜑)} = ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | clsslem 14919* | The closure of a subclass is a subclass of the closure. (Contributed by RP, 16-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 → ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝜑)}) | ||
| Syntax | ctcl 14920 | Extend class notation to include the transitive closure symbol. |
| class t+ | ||
| Syntax | crtcl 14921 | Extend class notation with reflexive-transitive closure. |
| class t* | ||
| Definition | df-trcl 14922* | Transitive closure of a relation. This is the smallest superset which has the transitive property. (Contributed by FL, 27-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ t+ = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑧)}) | ||
| Definition | df-rtrcl 14923* | Reflexive-transitive closure of a relation. This is the smallest superset which is reflexive property over all elements of its domain and range and has the transitive property. (Contributed by FL, 27-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ t* = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (( I ↾ (dom 𝑥 ∪ ran 𝑥)) ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑧)}) | ||
| Theorem | trcleq1 14924* | Equality of relations implies equality of transitive closures. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)} = ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)}) | ||
| Theorem | trclsslem 14925* | The transitive closure (as a relation) of a subclass is a subclass of the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 3-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 → ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)} ⊆ ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)}) | ||
| Theorem | trcleq2lem 14926 | Equality implies bijection. (Contributed by RP, 5-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑅 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | cvbtrcl 14927* | Change of bound variable in class of all transitive relations which are supersets of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 5-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 ∘ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑦)} | ||
| Theorem | trcleq12lem 14928 | Equality implies bijection. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → ((𝑅 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | trclexlem 14929 | Existence of relation implies existence of union with Cartesian product of domain and range. (Contributed by RP, 5-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∪ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | trclublem 14930* | If a relation exists then the class of transitive relations which are supersets of that relation is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 28-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∪ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥)}) | ||
| Theorem | trclubi 14931* | The Cartesian product of the domain and range of a relation is an upper bound for its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jan-2020.) (Revised by RP, 28-Apr-2020.) (Revised by AV, 26-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩ {𝑠 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠)} ⊆ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | trclubgi 14932* | The union with the Cartesian product of its domain and range is an upper bound for a set's transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2020.) (Revised by RP, 28-Apr-2020.) (Revised by AV, 26-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩ {𝑠 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠)} ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | trclub 14933* | The Cartesian product of the domain and range of a relation is an upper bound for its transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 17-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)} ⊆ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | trclubg 14934* | The union with the Cartesian product of its domain and range is an upper bound for a set's transitive closure (as a relation). (Contributed by RP, 17-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟)} ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | trclfv 14935* | The transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by RP, 28-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥)}) | ||
| Theorem | brintclab 14936* | Two ways to express a binary relation which is the intersection of a class. (Contributed by RP, 4-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | brtrclfv 14937* | Two ways of expressing the transitive closure of a binary relation. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑟((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟) → 𝐴𝑟𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | brcnvtrclfv 14938* | Two ways of expressing the transitive closure of the converse of a binary relation. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴◡(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑟((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟) → 𝐵𝑟𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | brtrclfvcnv 14939* | Two ways of expressing the transitive closure of the converse of a binary relation. (Contributed by RP, 10-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(t+‘◡𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑟((◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟) → 𝐴𝑟𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | brcnvtrclfvcnv 14940* | Two ways of expressing the transitive closure of the converse of the converse of a binary relation. (Contributed by RP, 10-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴◡(t+‘◡𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑟((◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟) → 𝐵𝑟𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvss 14941 | The transitive closure (as a relation) of a subclass is a subclass of the transitive closure. (Contributed by RP, 3-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → (t+‘𝑅) ⊆ (t+‘𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvub 14942 | The transitive closure of a relation has an upper bound. (Contributed by RP, 28-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘𝑅) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvlb 14943 | The transitive closure of a relation has a lower bound. (Contributed by RP, 28-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t+‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvcotr 14944 | The transitive closure of a relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by RP, 29-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ (t+‘𝑅)) ⊆ (t+‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvlb2 14945 | The transitive closure of a relation has a lower bound. (Contributed by RP, 8-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ (t+‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvlb3 14946 | The transitive closure of a relation has a lower bound. (Contributed by RP, 8-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∪ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)) ⊆ (t+‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | cotrtrclfv 14947 | The transitive closure of a transitive relation. (Contributed by RP, 28-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅) → (t+‘𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | trclidm 14948 | The transitive closure of a relation is idempotent. (Contributed by RP, 29-Apr-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (t+‘(t+‘𝑅)) = (t+‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | trclun 14949 | Transitive closure of a union of relations. (Contributed by RP, 5-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) → (t+‘(𝑅 ∪ 𝑆)) = (t+‘((t+‘𝑅) ∪ (t+‘𝑆)))) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvg 14950 | The value of the transitive closure of a relation is a superset or (for proper classes) the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 8-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ (t+‘𝑅) ∨ (t+‘𝑅) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | trclfvcotrg 14951 | The value of the transitive closure of a relation is always a transitive relation. (Contributed by RP, 8-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((t+‘𝑅) ∘ (t+‘𝑅)) ⊆ (t+‘𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | reltrclfv 14952 | The transitive closure of a relation is a relation. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → Rel (t+‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | dmtrclfv 14953 | The domain of the transitive closure is equal to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by RP, 9-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (t+‘𝑅) = dom 𝑅) | ||
| Syntax | crelexp 14954 | Extend class notation to include relation exponentiation. |
| class ↑𝑟 | ||
| Definition | df-relexp 14955* | Definition of repeated composition of a relation with itself, aka relation exponentiation. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 22-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ↑𝑟 = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑛 = 0, ( I ↾ (dom 𝑟 ∪ ran 𝑟)), (seq1((𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∘ 𝑟)), (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ 𝑟))‘𝑛))) | ||
| Theorem | reldmrelexp 14956 | The domain of the repeated composition of a relation is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ Rel dom ↑𝑟 | ||
| Theorem | relexp0g 14957 | A relation composed zero times is the (restricted) identity. (Contributed by RP, 22-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅↑𝑟0) = ( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | relexp0 14958 | A relation composed zero times is the (restricted) identity. (Contributed by RP, 22-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → (𝑅↑𝑟0) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relexp0d 14959 | A relation composed zero times is the (restricted) identity. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅↑𝑟0) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpsucnnr 14960 | A reduction for relation exponentiation to the right. (Contributed by RP, 22-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relexp1g 14961 | A relation composed once is itself. (Contributed by RP, 22-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅↑𝑟1) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfid5 14962 | Identity relation is equal to relational exponentiation to the first power. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jun-2020.) |
| ⊢ I = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥↑𝑟1)) | ||
| Theorem | dfid6 14963* | Identity relation expressed as indexed union of relational powers. (Contributed by RP, 9-Jun-2020.) |
| ⊢ I = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ {1} (𝑥↑𝑟𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | relexp1d 14964 | A relation composed once is itself. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅↑𝑟1) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexpsucnnl 14965 | A reduction for relation exponentiation to the left. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 1)) = (𝑅 ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | relexpsucl 14966 | A reduction for relation exponentiation to the left. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 1)) = (𝑅 ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | relexpsucr 14967 | A reduction for relation exponentiation to the right. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpsucrd 14968 | A reduction for relation exponentiation to the right. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 1)) = ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpsucld 14969 | A reduction for relation exponentiation to the left. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 1)) = (𝑅 ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | relexpcnv 14970 | Commutation of converse and relation exponentiation. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ◡(𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) = (◡𝑅↑𝑟𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpcnvd 14971 | Commutation of converse and relation exponentiation. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) = (◡𝑅↑𝑟𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | relexp0rel 14972 | The exponentiation of a class to zero is a relation. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → Rel (𝑅↑𝑟0)) | ||
| Theorem | relexprelg 14973 | The exponentiation of a class is a relation except when the exponent is one and the class is not a relation. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑁 = 1 → Rel 𝑅)) → Rel (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | relexprel 14974 | The exponentiation of a relation is a relation. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → Rel (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpreld 14975 | The exponentiation of a relation is a relation. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpnndm 14976 | The domain of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → dom (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexpdmg 14977 | The domain of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → dom (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpdm 14978 | The domain of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → dom (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexpdmd 14979 | The domain of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexpnnrn 14980 | The range of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexprng 14981 | The range of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relexprn 14982 | The range of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ran (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexprnd 14983 | The range of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexpfld 14984 | The field of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ∪ ∪ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexpfldd 14985 | The field of an exponentiation of a relation a subset of the relation's field. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ ∪ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relexpaddnn 14986 | Relation composition becomes addition under exponentiation. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑀)) = (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | relexpuzrel 14987 | The exponentiation of a class to an integer greater than 1 is a relation. (Contributed by RP, 23-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → Rel (𝑅↑𝑟𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | relexpaddg 14988 | Relation composition becomes addition under exponentiation except when the exponents total to one and the class isn't a relation. (Contributed by RP, 30-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ((𝑁 + 𝑀) = 1 → Rel 𝑅))) → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑀)) = (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | relexpaddd 14989 | Relation composition becomes addition under exponentiation. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅↑𝑟𝑁) ∘ (𝑅↑𝑟𝑀)) = (𝑅↑𝑟(𝑁 + 𝑀))) | ||
| Syntax | crtrcl 14990 | Extend class notation with recursively defined reflexive, transitive closure. |
| class t*rec | ||
| Definition | df-rtrclrec 14991* | The reflexive, transitive closure of a relation constructed as the union of all finite exponentiations. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ t*rec = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑟↑𝑟𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | rtrclreclem1 14992 | The reflexive, transitive closure is indeed a closure. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (t*rec‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | dfrtrclrec2 14993* | If two elements are connected by a reflexive, transitive closure, then they are connected via 𝑛 instances the relation, for some 𝑛. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t*rec‘𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 𝐴(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | rtrclreclem2 14994 | The reflexive, transitive closure is indeed reflexive. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ⊆ (t*rec‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | rtrclreclem3 14995 | The reflexive, transitive closure is indeed transitive. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((t*rec‘𝑅) ∘ (t*rec‘𝑅)) ⊆ (t*rec‘𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | rtrclreclem4 14996* | The reflexive, transitive closure of 𝑅 is the smallest reflexive, transitive relation which contains 𝑅 and the identity. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠((( I ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ (𝑠 ∘ 𝑠) ⊆ 𝑠) → (t*rec‘𝑅) ⊆ 𝑠)) | ||
| Theorem | dfrtrcl2 14997 | The two definitions t* and t*rec of the reflexive, transitive closure coincide if 𝑅 is indeed a relation. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (t*‘𝑅) = (t*rec‘𝑅)) | ||
If we have a statement that holds for some element, and a relation between elements that implies if it holds for the first element then it must hold for the second element, the principle of transitive induction shows the statement holds for any element related to the first by the (reflexive-)transitive closure of the relation. | ||
| Theorem | relexpindlem 14998* | Principle of transitive induction, finite and non-class version. The first three hypotheses give various existences, the next three give necessary substitutions and the last two are the basis and the induction hypothesis. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜂 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑆 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑗𝑅𝑥 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑆(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝑥 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | relexpind 14999* | Principle of transitive induction, finite version. The first three hypotheses give various existences, the next four give necessary substitutions and the last two are the basis and the induction hypothesis. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by RP, 30-May-2020.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜂 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑆 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑗𝑅𝑥 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑆(𝑅↑𝑟𝑛)𝑋 → 𝜏))) | ||
| Theorem | rtrclind 15000* | Principle of transitive induction. The first three hypotheses give various existences, the next four give necessary substitutions and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by Drahflow, 12-Nov-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜂 → Rel 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑆 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑗 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑗𝑅𝑥 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 → (𝑆(t*‘𝑅)𝑋 → 𝜏)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |