| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > brcodir | GIF version | ||
| Description: Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| brcodir | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | brcog 4945 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵))) | |
| 2 | vex 2824 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
| 3 | brcnvg 4959 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | mpan 428 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)) |
| 5 | 4 | anbi2d 468 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
| 6 | 5 | adantl 277 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
| 7 | 6 | exbidv 1878 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
| 8 | 1, 7 | bitrd 188 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∃wex 1545 ∈ wcel 2209 Vcvv 2821 class class class wbr 4128 ◡ccnv 4771 ∘ ccom 4776 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 721 ax-5 1500 ax-7 1501 ax-gen 1502 ax-ie1 1546 ax-ie2 1547 ax-8 1557 ax-10 1558 ax-11 1559 ax-i12 1560 ax-bndl 1562 ax-4 1563 ax-17 1579 ax-i9 1583 ax-ial 1587 ax-i5r 1588 ax-14 2212 ax-ext 2220 ax-sep 4247 ax-pow 4309 ax-pr 4344 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1011 df-tru 1405 df-nf 1514 df-sb 1816 df-eu 2089 df-mo 2090 df-clab 2225 df-cleq 2231 df-clel 2234 df-nfc 2381 df-v 2823 df-un 3224 df-in 3226 df-ss 3233 df-pw 3690 df-sn 3714 df-pr 3715 df-op 3717 df-br 4129 df-opab 4191 df-cnv 4780 df-co 4781 |
| This theorem is referenced by: codir 5174 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |