![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eqopab2b | GIF version |
Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eqopab2b | ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssopab2b 4101 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | |
2 | ssopab2b 4101 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | anbi12i 448 | . 2 ⊢ (({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
4 | eqss 3040 | . 2 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
5 | 2albiim 1422 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3bitr4i 210 | 1 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∀wal 1287 = wceq 1289 ⊆ wss 2999 {copab 3896 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 665 ax-5 1381 ax-7 1382 ax-gen 1383 ax-ie1 1427 ax-ie2 1428 ax-8 1440 ax-10 1441 ax-11 1442 ax-i12 1443 ax-bndl 1444 ax-4 1445 ax-14 1450 ax-17 1464 ax-i9 1468 ax-ial 1472 ax-i5r 1473 ax-ext 2070 ax-sep 3955 ax-pow 4007 ax-pr 4034 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-3an 926 df-tru 1292 df-nf 1395 df-sb 1693 df-eu 1951 df-mo 1952 df-clab 2075 df-cleq 2081 df-clel 2084 df-nfc 2217 df-ral 2364 df-v 2621 df-un 3003 df-in 3005 df-ss 3012 df-pw 3429 df-sn 3450 df-pr 3451 df-op 3453 df-opab 3898 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |