Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eqopab2b | GIF version |
Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eqopab2b | ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssopab2b 4254 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | |
2 | ssopab2b 4254 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | anbi12i 456 | . 2 ⊢ (({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
4 | eqss 3157 | . 2 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
5 | 2albiim 1476 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3bitr4i 211 | 1 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1341 = wceq 1343 ⊆ wss 3116 {copab 4042 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1435 ax-7 1436 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-8 1492 ax-10 1493 ax-11 1494 ax-i12 1495 ax-bndl 1497 ax-4 1498 ax-17 1514 ax-i9 1518 ax-ial 1522 ax-i5r 1523 ax-14 2139 ax-ext 2147 ax-sep 4100 ax-pow 4153 ax-pr 4187 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 970 df-tru 1346 df-nf 1449 df-sb 1751 df-eu 2017 df-mo 2018 df-clab 2152 df-cleq 2158 df-clel 2161 df-nfc 2297 df-ral 2449 df-v 2728 df-un 3120 df-in 3122 df-ss 3129 df-pw 3561 df-sn 3582 df-pr 3583 df-op 3585 df-opab 4044 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |