| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eqopab2b | GIF version | ||
| Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eqopab2b | ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ssopab2b 4341 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | ssopab2b 4341 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anbi12i 460 | . 2 ⊢ (({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
| 4 | eqss 3216 | . 2 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
| 5 | 2albiim 1512 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) | |
| 6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3bitr4i 212 | 1 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 ∀wal 1371 = wceq 1373 ⊆ wss 3174 {copab 4120 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 711 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-10 1529 ax-11 1530 ax-i12 1531 ax-bndl 1533 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-14 2181 ax-ext 2189 ax-sep 4178 ax-pow 4234 ax-pr 4269 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 983 df-tru 1376 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-eu 2058 df-mo 2059 df-clab 2194 df-cleq 2200 df-clel 2203 df-nfc 2339 df-ral 2491 df-v 2778 df-un 3178 df-in 3180 df-ss 3187 df-pw 3628 df-sn 3649 df-pr 3650 df-op 3652 df-opab 4122 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |