| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer | 
      
      
      < Previous  
      Next >
      
       Nearby theorems  | 
  ||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > riotabidv | GIF version | ||
| Description: Formula-building deduction for restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| riotabidv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| riotabidv | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | 
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | biidd 172 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 2 | riotabidv.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anbi12d 473 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) | 
| 4 | 3 | iotabidv 5241 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) | 
| 5 | df-riota 5877 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | df-riota 5877 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3eqtr4g 2254 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | 
| Colors of variables: wff set class | 
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2167 ℩cio 5217 ℩crio 5876 | 
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1461 ax-7 1462 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-10 1519 ax-11 1520 ax-i12 1521 ax-bndl 1523 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 ax-i5r 1549 ax-ext 2178 | 
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 df-clab 2183 df-cleq 2189 df-clel 2192 df-nfc 2328 df-rex 2481 df-uni 3840 df-iota 5219 df-riota 5877 | 
| This theorem is referenced by: riotaeqbidv 5880 csbriotag 5890 infvalti 7088 caucvgsrlemfv 7858 axcaucvglemval 7964 axcaucvglemcau 7965 subval 8218 divvalap 8701 divfnzn 9695 flval 10362 cjval 11010 sqrtrval 11165 qnumval 12353 qdenval 12354 grpinvval 13175 | 
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |