| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > riotabidv | GIF version | ||
| Description: Formula-building deduction for restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidv | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | biidd 172 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 2 | riotabidv.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anbi12d 473 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | 3 | iotabidv 5334 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 5 | df-riota 6002 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | df-riota 6002 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3eqtr4g 2290 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1398 ∈ wcel 2203 ℩cio 5309 ℩crio 6001 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 717 ax-5 1496 ax-7 1497 ax-gen 1498 ax-ie1 1542 ax-ie2 1543 ax-8 1553 ax-10 1554 ax-11 1555 ax-i12 1556 ax-bndl 1558 ax-4 1559 ax-17 1575 ax-i9 1579 ax-ial 1583 ax-i5r 1584 ax-ext 2214 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1401 df-nf 1510 df-sb 1812 df-clab 2219 df-cleq 2225 df-clel 2228 df-nfc 2373 df-rex 2526 df-uni 3914 df-iota 5311 df-riota 6002 |
| This theorem is referenced by: riotaeqbidv 6005 csbriotag 6016 infvalti 7312 caucvgsrlemfv 8105 axcaucvglemval 8211 axcaucvglemcau 8212 subval 8464 divvalap 8947 divfnzn 9952 flval 10631 cjval 11526 sqrtrval 11681 qnumval 12878 qdenval 12879 grpinvval 13748 uspgredg2v 16208 usgredg2v 16211 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |