| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > riotabidv | GIF version | ||
| Description: Formula-building deduction for restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidv | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | biidd 172 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 2 | riotabidv.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anbi12d 473 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | 3 | iotabidv 5340 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 5 | df-riota 6011 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | df-riota 6011 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3eqtr4g 2292 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1398 ∈ wcel 2205 ℩cio 5315 ℩crio 6010 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 717 ax-5 1496 ax-7 1497 ax-gen 1498 ax-ie1 1542 ax-ie2 1543 ax-8 1553 ax-10 1554 ax-11 1555 ax-i12 1556 ax-bndl 1558 ax-4 1559 ax-17 1575 ax-i9 1579 ax-ial 1583 ax-i5r 1584 ax-ext 2216 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1401 df-nf 1510 df-sb 1812 df-clab 2221 df-cleq 2227 df-clel 2230 df-nfc 2375 df-rex 2528 df-uni 3920 df-iota 5317 df-riota 6011 |
| This theorem is referenced by: riotaeqbidv 6014 csbriotag 6025 infvalti 7326 caucvgsrlemfv 8122 axcaucvglemval 8228 axcaucvglemcau 8229 subval 8482 divvalap 8968 divfnzn 9974 flval 10659 cjval 11558 sqrtrval 11714 qnumval 12911 qdenval 12912 grpinvval 13802 uspgredg2v 16346 usgredg2v 16349 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |