| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > riotabidv | GIF version | ||
| Description: Formula-building deduction for restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| riotabidv | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | biidd 172 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 2 | riotabidv.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | anbi12d 473 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | 3 | iotabidv 5260 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| 5 | df-riota 5909 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 6 | df-riota 5909 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3eqtr4g 2264 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1373 ∈ wcel 2177 ℩cio 5236 ℩crio 5908 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 711 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-10 1529 ax-11 1530 ax-i12 1531 ax-bndl 1533 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-ext 2188 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1376 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-clab 2193 df-cleq 2199 df-clel 2202 df-nfc 2338 df-rex 2491 df-uni 3854 df-iota 5238 df-riota 5909 |
| This theorem is referenced by: riotaeqbidv 5912 csbriotag 5922 infvalti 7136 caucvgsrlemfv 7917 axcaucvglemval 8023 axcaucvglemcau 8024 subval 8277 divvalap 8760 divfnzn 9755 flval 10428 cjval 11206 sqrtrval 11361 qnumval 12557 qdenval 12558 grpinvval 13425 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |