Theorem dffun3f 9978

Description: Alternate definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 14-Mar-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dffun3f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dffun3f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
dffun3f.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dffun3f	⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dffun3f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dffun3f.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		dffun3f.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3	1, 2	dffun6f 6553	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
4		nfcv 2922	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝑥
5		dffun3f.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
6		nfcv 2922	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝑦
7	4, 5, 6	nfbr 5151	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥𝐴𝑦
8	7	mof 2588	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
9	8	albii 1851	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	9	anbi2i 635	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦) ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
11	3, 10	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567  ∃wex 1811  ∃*wmo 2562  Ⅎwnfc 2907   class class class wbr 5102  Rel wrel 5655  Fun wfun 6532

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-fun 6540

This theorem is used by:  setrec2lem2  9979