Theorem dffun3f 50488

Description: Alternate definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 14-Mar-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dffun3f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dffun3f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
dffun3f.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dffun3f	⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dffun3f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dffun3f.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		dffun3f.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3	1, 2	dffun6f 6551	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
4		nfcv 2924	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝑥
5		dffun3f.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴
6		nfcv 2924	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝑦
7	4, 5, 6	nfbr 5157	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥𝐴𝑦
8	7	mof 2590	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
9	8	albii 1848	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	9	anbi2i 634	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦) ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
11	3, 10	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1567  ∃wex 1808  ∃*wmo 2564  Ⅎwnfc 2909   class class class wbr 5108  Rel wrel 5665  Fun wfun 6530

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5403

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-id 5555  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-fun 6538

This theorem is used by:  setrec2lem2  50500