P. 482 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 48101-48200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	reuabaiotaiota 48101*	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique satisfying value of {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	reuaiotaiota 48102	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaexb 48103	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotavb 48104	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is the universe iff there is no unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = V)
Theorem	aiotaint 48105	This is to df-aiota 48099 what iotauni 6508 is to df-iota 6487 (it uses intersection like df-aiota 48099, similar to iotauni 6508 using union like df-iota 6487; we could also prove an analogous result using union here too, in the same way that we have iotaint 6509). (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	dfaiota3 48106	Alternate definition of ℩', using the if operator: this is to df-aiota 48099 what dfiota4 6523 is to df-iota 6487. It is simpler than df-aiota 48099 and uses no dummy variables, so it would be the preferred definition if ℩' becomes the description binder used in set.mm. (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥𝜑, ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}, V)
Theorem	iotan0aiotaex 48107	If the iota over a wff 𝜑 is not empty, the alternate iota over 𝜑 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩𝑥𝜑) ≠ ∅ → (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotaexaiotaiota 48108	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff the iota and the alternate iota over 𝜑 are equal. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaval 48109*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of (alternate) iota. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	aiota0def 48110*	Example for a defined alternate iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 is a wff satisfied by a unique value 𝑥, namely 𝑥 = ∅ (the empty set is the one and only set which is a subset of every set). This corresponds to iota0def 48052. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) = ∅
Theorem	aiota0ndef 48111*	Example for an undefined alternate iota being no set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 is a wff not satisfied by a (unique) value 𝑥 (there is no set, and therefore certainly no unique set, which contains every set). This is different from iota0ndef 48053, where the iota still is a set (the empty set). (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ∉ V
21.50.3  Double restricted existential uniqueness
21.50.3.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	r19.32 48112	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, analogous to r19.32v 3196. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexsb 48113*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2389. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rexrsb 48114*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2389. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexsb 48115*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to rexsb 48113. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexrsb 48116*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to 2exsb 2390. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	cbvral2 48117*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvral2v 3354. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex2 48118*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvrex2v 3355. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralndv1 48119	Example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on (actually is) the bound variable: All sets containing themselves contain the universal class. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 V ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	ralndv2 48120	Second example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on the bound variable: all subsets of a set are sets. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥𝑥 ∈ V
21.50.3.2  Restricted uniqueness and "at most one" quantification
Theorem	reuf1odnf 48121*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. Variant of reuf1od 48122 with no distinct variable condition for 𝜒. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	reuf1od 48122*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	euoreqb 48123*	There is a set which is equal to one of two other sets iff the other sets are equal. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
21.50.3.3  Analogs to Existential uniqueness (double quantification)
Theorem	2reu3 48124*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu3 2679. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)))
Theorem	2reu7 48125*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu7 2683. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	2reu8 48126*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu8 2684. Curiously, we can put ∃! on either of the internal conjuncts but not both. We can also commute ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 using 2reu7 48125. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
21.50.3.4  Additional theorems for double restricted existential uniqueness
Theorem	2reu8i 48127*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification, see also 2reu8 48126. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(x,y), ta(v,y), ch(x,w), th(v,w), et(x,b), ps(a,b), ze(a,w). (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑏 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑏) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜂 → (𝑏 = 𝑦 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑎 = 𝑥)))))
Theorem	2reuimp0 48128*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(a,b), th(a,c), ch(d,b), ta(d,c), et(a,e), ps(a,f) (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜂 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → 𝑎 = 𝑑)) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑒 = 𝑓)))
Theorem	2reuimp 48129*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification if the class of the quantified elements is not empty. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → (𝜓 → (𝜂 ∧ (𝑎 = 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝑓)))))
21.50.4  Alternative definitions of function and operation values The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6539) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 7224. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6909 and fvprc 6869). Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹 or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6910). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹'''𝐴) (see df-afv 48134) would be possible which evaluates to the universal class ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V) if it is not meaningful (see afvnfundmuv 48153, ndmafv 48154, afvprc 48158 and nfunsnafv 48156), and which corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴)) if it is (see afvfundmfveq 48152). That means (𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afvpcfv0 48160), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V is not generally valid. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴, which also would result in (𝐹'''𝐴) = V. In this context we say (𝐹'''𝐴) "is not defined" instead of "is not meaningful". With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ V <-> "(𝐹'''𝐴) is meaningful/defined". An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 19) proofs using the definition df-fv 6539 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 8 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6876-> afveq1 48148, fveq2 6877-> afveq2 48149, nffv 6887-> nfafv 48150, csbfv12 6922-> csbafv12g , fvres 6896-> afvres 48186, rlimdm 15698-> rlimdmafv 48191, tz6.12-1 6900-> tz6.12-1-afv 48188, fveu 6866-> afveu 48167. Three theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6539 are within a mathbox (fvsb 45393) or not used (isumclim3 15905, avril1 31046). However, the remaining 8 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6539 are used more or less often: * fvex 6890: used in about 1750 proofs. * tz6.12-1 6900: root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: fvprc 6869 (used in about 127 proofs), tz6.12i 6903 (used - indirectly via fvbr0 6904 and fvrn0 6905- in 18 proofs, and in fvclss 7237 used in fvclex 7960 used in fvresex 7961, which is not used!), dcomex 10506 (used in 4 proofs), ndmfv 6909 (used in 86 proofs) and nfunsn 6916 (used by dffv2 6972 which is not used). * fv2 6872: only used by elfv 6875, which is only used by fv3 6895, which is not used. * dffv3 6873: used by dffv4 6874 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in deprecated (usage discouraged) theorems or within mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 45840), by shftval 15207 (itself used in 9 proofs), by dffv5 36656 (mathbox) and by fvco2 6974, which has the analogue afvco2 48190. * fvopab5 7019: used only by ajval 31445 (not used) and by adjval 32474 (used - indirectly - in 9 proofs). * zsum 15864: used (via isum 15865, sum0 15867 and fsumsers 15874) in more than 90 proofs. * isumshft 15988: used in pserdv2 26739 and (via logtayl 26970) 4 other proofs. * ovtpos 8242: used in 14 proofs. As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6872, dffv3 6873, fvopab5 7019, zsum 15864, isumshft 15988 and ovtpos 8242 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6890 and tz6.12-1 6900 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values. With the same arguments, an alternative definition of operation values ((𝐴𝑂𝐵)) could be meaningful to avoid ambiguities, see df-aov 48135. For additional details, see https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 48135.
Syntax	wdfat 48130	Extend the definition of a wff to include the "defined at" predicate. Read: "(the function) 𝐹 is defined at (the argument) 𝐴". In a previous version, the token "def@" was used. However, since the @ is used (informally) as a replacement for $ in commented out sections that may be deleted some day. While there is no violation of any standard to use the @ in a token, it could make the search for such commented-out sections slightly more difficult. (See remark of Norman Megill at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4).
wff 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Syntax	cafv 48131	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". In a previous version, the symbol " ' " was used. However, since the similarity with the symbol ‘ used for the current definition of a function's value (see df-fv 6539), which, by the way, was intended to visualize that in many cases ‘ and " ' " are exchangeable, makes reading the theorems, especially those which use both definitions as dfafv2 48146, very difficult, 3 apostrophes ''' are used now so that it's easier to distinguish from df-fv 6539 and df-ima 5664. And not three backticks ( three times ‘) since that would be annoying to escape in a comment. (See remark of Norman Megill and Gerard Lang at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 5664).
class (𝐹'''𝐴)
Syntax	caov 48132	Extend class notation to include the value of an operation 𝐹 (such as +) for two arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row surrounded by a pair of parentheses in contrast to the current definition, see df-ov 7415.
class ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Definition	df-dfat 48133	Definition of the predicate that determines if some class 𝐹 is defined as function for an argument 𝐴 or, in other words, if the function value for some class 𝐹 for an argument 𝐴 is defined. We say that 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 if a 𝐹 is a function restricted to the member 𝐴 of its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
Definition	df-afv 48134*	Alternative definition of the value of a function, (𝐹'''𝐴), also known as function application. In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see df-fv 6539 and ndmfv 6909), (𝐹'''𝐴) = V if F is not defined for A! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.) (Revised by BJ/AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = (℩'𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-aov 48135	Define the value of an operation. In contrast to df-ov 7415, the alternative definition for a function value (see df-afv 48134) is used. By this, the value of the operation applied to two arguments is the universal class if the operation is not defined for these two arguments. There are still no restrictions of any kind on what those class expressions may be, although only certain kinds of class expressions - a binary operation 𝐹 and its arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵- will be useful for proving meaningful theorems. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐹'''⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
21.50.4.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	ralbinrald 48136*	Elemination of a restricted universal quantification under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
21.50.4.2  The universal class (extension)
Theorem	nvelim 48137	If a class is the universal class it doesn't belong to any class, generalization of nvel 5273. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
21.50.4.3  Introduce the Axiom of Power Sets (extension)
Theorem	alneu 48138	If a statement holds for all sets, there is not a unique set for which the statement holds. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eu2ndop1stv 48139*	If there is a unique second component in an ordered pair contained in a given set, the first component must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
21.50.4.4  Predicate "defined at"
Theorem	dfateq12d 48140	Equality deduction for "defined at". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 defAt 𝐵))
Theorem	nfdfat 48141	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Theorem	dfdfat2 48142*	Alternate definition of the predicate "defined at" not using the Fun predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	fundmdfat 48143	A function is defined at any element of its domain. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatprc 48144	A function is not defined at a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatelrn 48145	The value of a function 𝐹 at a set 𝐴 is in the range of the function 𝐹 if 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
21.50.4.5  Alternative definition of the value of a function
Theorem	dfafv2 48146	Alternative definition of (𝐹'''𝐴) using (𝐹‘𝐴) directly. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Revised by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
Theorem	afveq12d 48147	Equality deduction for function value, analogous to fveq12d 6884. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐵))
Theorem	afveq1 48148	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6876. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐴))
Theorem	afveq2 48149	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6876. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐵))
Theorem	nfafv 48150	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6887. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6889 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 48141 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)
Theorem	csbafv12g 48151	Move class substitution in and out of a function value, analogous to csbfv12 6922, with a direct proof proposed by Mario Carneiro, analogous to csbov123 7456. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹'''𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹'''⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
Theorem	afvfundmfveq 48152	If a class is a function restricted to a member of its domain, then the function value for this member is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvnfundmuv 48153	If a set is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the set, then the function value for this set is the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	ndmafv 48154	The value of a class outside its domain is the universe, compare with ndmfv 6909. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvdm 48155	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the argument is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnafv 48156	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its value is the universe, compare with nfunsn 6916. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvfunressn 48157	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the class restricted to the singleton of the argument is a function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
Theorem	afvprc 48158	A function's value at a proper class is the universe, compare with fvprc 6869. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvv 48159	If a function's value at an argument is a set, the argument is also a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	afvpcfv0 48160	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the universe, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvnufveq 48161	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ≠ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvvfveq 48162	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0fv0 48163	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the empty set, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvfvn0fveq 48164	If the function's value at an argument is not the empty set, it equals the value of the alternative function at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0nbfvbi 48165	The function's value at an argument is an element of a set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is an element of that set, if the set does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∅ ∉ 𝐵 → ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvfv0bi 48166	The function's value at an argument is the empty set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is either the empty set or the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ ∨ (𝐹'''𝐴) = V))
Theorem	afveu 48167*	The value of a function at a unique point, analogous to fveu 6866. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝐴𝐹𝑥 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑥})
Theorem	fnbrafvb 48168	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to fnbrfvb 6927. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	fnopafvb 48169	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6928. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafvb 48170	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to funbrfvb 6930. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	funopafvb 48171	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to funopfvb 6931. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafv 48172	The second argument of a binary relation on a function is the function's value, analogous to funbrfv 6925. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵))
Theorem	funbrafv2b 48173	Function value in terms of a binary relation, analogous to funbrfv2b 6934. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	dfafn5a 48174*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6935 (only one direction of implication!). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥)))
Theorem	dfafn5b 48175*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6935 (only if it is assumed that the function value for each x is a set). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥))))
Theorem	fnrnafv 48176*	The range of a function expressed as a collection of the function's values, analogous to fnrnfv 6936. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = (𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelrnb 48177*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, analogous to fvelrnb 6937 with the additional requirement that the member must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	afvelrnb0 48178*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, only one direction of implication of fvelrnb 6937. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	dfaimafn 48179*	Alternate definition of the image of a function, analogous to dfimafn 6939. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝑦})
Theorem	dfaimafn2 48180*	Alternate definition of the image of a function as an indexed union of singletons of function values, analogous to dfimafn2 6940. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {(𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelima 48181*	Function value in an image, analogous to fvelima 6942. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐴)
Theorem	afvelrn 48182	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fvelrn 7068. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fnafvelrn 48183	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fnfvelrn 7072. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐵) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fafvelcdm 48184	A function's value belongs to its codomain, analogous to ffvelcdm 7073. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ffnafv 48185*	A function maps to a class to which all values belong, analogous to ffnfv 7111. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvres 48186	The value of a restricted function, analogous to fvres 6896. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴))
Theorem	tz6.12-afv 48187*	Function value. Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12 6901. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	tz6.12-1-afv 48188*	Function value (Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12-1 6900. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝑦 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	dmfcoafv 48189	Domains of a function composition, analogous to dmfco 6973. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↔ (𝐺'''𝐴) ∈ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	afvco2 48190	Value of a function composition, analogous to fvco2 6974. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)'''𝑋) = (𝐹'''(𝐺'''𝑋)))
Theorem	rlimdmafv 48191	Two ways to express that a function has a limit, analogous to rlimdm 15698. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 '''𝐹)))
21.50.4.6  Alternative definition of the value of an operation
Theorem	aoveq123d 48192	Equality deduction for operation value, analogous to oveq123d 7433. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐵𝐺𝐷)) )
Theorem	nfaov 48193	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for operation value, analogous to nfov 7442. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nfovd 7441 is not quickly possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of alternative operation values is based on are not available (see nfafv 48150). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	csbaovg 48194	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
Theorem	aovfundmoveq 48195	If a class is a function restricted to an ordered pair of its domain, then the value of the operation on this pair is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	aovnfundmuv 48196	If an ordered pair is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the ordered pair, then the operation value for this pair is the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaov 48197	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmafv 48154. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaovg 48198	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmovg 7596. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	aovvdm 48199	If the operation value of a class for an ordered pair is a set, the ordered pair is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnaov 48200	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its operation value is the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)