P. 482 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 48101-48200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ndmaovcom 48101	Any operation is commutative outside its domain, analogous to ndmovcom 7605. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = ((𝐵𝐹𝐴)) )
Theorem	ndmaovass 48102	Any operation is associative outside its domain. In contrast to ndmovass 7606 where it is required that the operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆), no additional assumption is required. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) 𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐹 ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) )) )
Theorem	ndmaovdistr 48103	Any operation is distributive outside its domain. In contrast to ndmovdistr 7607 where it is required that the operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆), no additional assumption is required. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ dom 𝐺 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐺 ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) )) = (( ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)) 𝐹 ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)) )) )
21.50.5  Alternative definitions of function values (2) In the following, a second approach is followed to define function values alternately to df-afv 48016. The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6545) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 7229. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6914 and fvprc 6874). "(𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful" means "the class 𝐹 regarded as function is defined at the argument 𝐴" in this context. This is also expressed by 𝐹 defAt 𝐴, see df-dfat 48015. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴. Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹, 𝐹 defAt 𝐴, or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6915). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹''''𝐴) (see df-afv2 48105) would be possible which evaluates to a set not belonging to the range of 𝐹 ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹) if it is not meaningful (see ndfatafv2 48107). We say "(𝐹''''𝐴) is not defined (or undefined)" if (𝐹''''𝐴) is not in the range of 𝐹 ((𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹). Because of afv2ndefb 48120, this is equivalent to ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹. If (𝐹''''𝐴) is in the range of 𝐹 ((𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹), we say that "(𝐹''''𝐴) is defined". If ran 𝐹 is a set, we can use the symbol Undef to express that (𝐹''''𝐴) is not defined: (𝐹''''𝐴) = (Undef‘ran 𝐹) (see ndfatafv2undef 48108). We could have used this symbol directly to define the alternate value of a function, which would have the advantage that (𝐹''''𝐴) would always be a set. But first this symbol is defined using the original function value, which would not make it possible to replace the original definition by the alternate definition, and second we would have to assume that ran 𝐹 ∈ V in most of the theorems. To summarize, that means (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afv2ndeffv0 48156), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹 is not generally valid, see afv2fv0 48161. The alternate definition, however, corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹''''𝐴)) if the function 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 (see dfatafv2eqfv 48157). With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹), see dfatafv2rnb 48123. An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 24) proofs using the definition df-fv 6545 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 7 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6881-> afv2eq1 48112, fveq2 6882-> afv2eq2 48113, nffv 6892-> nfafv2 48114, csbfv12 6927-> csbafv212g , rlimdm 15642-> rlimdmafv2 48154, tz6.12-1 6905-> tz6.12-1-afv2 48137, fveu 6871-> afv2eu 48134. Six theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6545 are within a mathbox (fvsb 45282, uncov 8876) or not used (rlimdmafv 48073, avril1 30951) or experimental (dfafv2 48028, dfafv22 48155). However, the remaining 11 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6545 are used more or less often: * fvex 6895: used in about 1600 proofs: Only if the function is defined at the argument, or the range of the function/class is a set, analog theorems can be proven (dfatafv2ex 48109 resp. afv2ex 48110). All of these 1600 proofs have to be checked if one of these two theorems can be used instead of fvex 6895. * fvres 6901: used in about 400 proofs : Only if the function is defined at the argument, an analog theorem can be proven (afv2res 48135). In the undefined case such a theorem cannot exist (without additional assumptions), because the range of (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) is mostly different from the range of 𝐹, and therefore also the "undefined" values are different. All of these 400 proofs have to be checked if afv2res 48135 can be used instead of fvres 6901. * tz6.12-2 6869 (-> tz6.12-2-afv2 48133): root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: ** fvprc 6874 (-> afv2prc 48122), used in 193 proofs, ** tz6.12i 6908 (-> tz6.12i-afv2 48139), used - indirectly via fvbr0 6909 and fvrn0 6910 - in 19 proofs, and in fvclss 7242 used in fvclex 7960 used in fvresex 7961 (which is not used!) and in dcomex 10453 (used in 4 proofs), ** ndmfv 6914 (-> ndmafv2nrn ), used in 124 proofs ** nfunsn 6921 (-> nfunsnafv2 ), used by fvfundmfvn0 6922 (used in 3 proofs), and dffv2 6977 (not used) ** funpartfv 36532, setrec2lem1 50627 (mathboxes) * fv2 6877: only used by elfv 6880, which is only used by fv3 6900, which is not used. * dffv3 6878 (-> dfafv23 ): used by dffv4 6879 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 45729), by shftval 15151 (itself used in 11 proofs), by dffv5 36509 (mathbox) and by fvco2 6979 (-> afv2co2 48153). * fvopab5 7024: used only by ajval 31350 (not used) and by adjval 32379, which is used in adjval2 32380 (not used) and in adjbdln 32572 (used in 7 proofs). * zsum 15808: used (via isum 15809, sum0 15811, sumss 15814 and fsumsers 15818) in 76 proofs. * isumshft 15932: used in pserdv2 26673 (used in logtayl 26905, binomcxplemdvsum 45187) , eftlub 16203 (used in 4 proofs), binomcxplemnotnn0 45188 (used in binomcxp 45189 only) and logtayl 26905 (used in 4 proofs). * ovtpos 8243: used in 16 proofs. * zprod 16030: used in 3 proofs: iprod 16031, zprodn0 16032 and prodss 16040 * iprodclim3 16093: not used! As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6877, dffv3 6878, fvopab5 7024, zsum 15808, isumshft 15932, ovtpos 8243 and zprod 16030 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6895, fvres 6901 and tz6.12-2 6869 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values.
Syntax	cafv2 48104	Extend the definition of a class to include the alternate function value. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". For using several apostrophes as a symbol see comment for cafv 48013.
class (𝐹''''𝐴)
Definition	df-afv2 48105*	Alternate definition of the value of a function, (𝐹''''𝐴), also known as function application (and called "alternate function value" in the following). In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see comment of df-fv 6545, and especially ndmfv 6914), (𝐹''''𝐴) is guaranteed not to be in the range of 𝐹 if 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴 (whereas ∅ can be a member of ran 𝐹). (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹''''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥), 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	dfatafv2iota 48106*	If a function is defined at a class 𝐴 the alternate function value at 𝐴 is the unique value assigned to 𝐴 by the function (analogously to (𝐹‘𝐴)). (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥))
Theorem	ndfatafv2 48107	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 if the function is not defined at this set 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	ndfatafv2undef 48108	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is undefined if the function, whose range is a set, is not defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴) → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (Undef‘ran 𝐹))
Theorem	dfatafv2ex 48109	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is always a set if the function/class 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	afv2ex 48110	The alternate function value is always a set if the range of the function is a set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	afv2eq12d 48111	Equality deduction for function value, analogous to fveq12d 6889. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (𝐺''''𝐵))
Theorem	afv2eq1 48112	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6881. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (𝐺''''𝐴))
Theorem	afv2eq2 48113	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq2 6882. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (𝐹''''𝐵))
Theorem	nfafv2 48114	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6892. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6894 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 48023 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2022.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹''''𝐴)
Theorem	csbafv212g 48115	Move class substitution in and out of a function value, analogous to csbfv12 6927, with a direct proof proposed by Mario Carneiro, analogous to csbov123 7461. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹''''𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹''''⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
Theorem	fexafv2ex 48116	The alternate function value is always a set if the function (resp. the domain of the function) is a set. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	ndfatafv2nrn 48117	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 at which the function is not defined is undefined, i.e., not in the range of the function. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	ndmafv2nrn 48118	The value of a class outside its domain is not in the range, compare with ndmfv 6914. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	funressndmafv2rn 48119	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is defined, i.e., in the range of the function if the function is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	afv2ndefb 48120	Two ways to say that an alternate function value is not defined. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnafv2 48121	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its value at the singleton element is undefined, compare with nfunsn 6921. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	afv2prc 48122	A function's value at a proper class is not defined, compare with fvprc 6874. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	dfatafv2rnb 48123	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is defined, i.e. in the range of the function, iff the function is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	afv2orxorb 48124	If a set is in the range of a function, the alternate function value at a class 𝐴 equals this set or is not in the range of the function iff the alternate function value at the class 𝐴 either equals this set or is not in the range of the function. If 𝐵 ∉ ran 𝐹, both disjuncts of the exclusive or can be true: (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹. (Contributed by AV, 11-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 → (((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 ∨ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹) ↔ ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 ⊻ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)))
Theorem	dmafv2rnb 48125	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is defined, i.e., in the range of the function, iff 𝐴 is in the domain of the function. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	fundmafv2rnb 48126	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is defined, i.e., in the range of the function iff 𝐴 is in the domain of the function. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	afv2elrn 48127	An alternate function value belongs to the range of the function, analogous to fvelrn 7073. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	afv20defat 48128	If the alternate function value at an argument is the empty set, the function is defined at this argument. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹''''𝐴) = ∅ → 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	fnafv2elrn 48129	An alternate function value belongs to the range of the function, analogous to fnfvelrn 7077. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹''''𝐵) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fafv2elcdm 48130	An alternate function value belongs to the codomain of the function, analogous to ffvelcdm 7078. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹''''𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	fafv2elrnb 48131	An alternate function value is defined, i.e., belongs to the range of the function, iff its argument is in the domain of the function. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹''''𝐶) ∈ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	fcdmvafv2v 48132	If the codomain of a function is a set, the alternate function value is always also a set. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹''''𝐶) ∈ V)
Theorem	tz6.12-2-afv2 48133*	Function value when 𝐹 is (locally) not a function. Theorem 6.12(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12-2 6869. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥 𝐴𝐹𝑥 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	afv2eu 48134*	The value of a function at a unique point, analogous to fveu 6871. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝐴𝐹𝑥 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑥})
Theorem	afv2res 48135	The value of a restricted function for an argument at which the function is defined. Analog to fvres 6901. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)''''𝐴) = (𝐹''''𝐴))
Theorem	tz6.12-afv2 48136*	Function value (Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27), analogous to tz6.12 6906. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	tz6.12-1-afv2 48137*	Function value (Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27), analogous to tz6.12-1 6905. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝑦 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) → (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	tz6.12c-afv2 48138*	Corollary of Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12c 6904. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	tz6.12i-afv2 48139	Corollary of Theorem 6.12(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. analogous to tz6.12i 6908. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 → ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 → 𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	funressnbrafv2 48140	The second argument of a binary relation on a function is the function's value, analogous to funbrfv 6930. (Contributed by AV, 7-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵))
Theorem	dfatbrafv2b 48141	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to fnbrfvb 6932 or funbrfvb 6935. 𝐵 ∈ V is required, because otherwise 𝐴𝐹𝐵 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝐹 can be true, but (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 is always false (because of dfatafv2ex 48109). (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	dfatopafv2b 48142	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6933 or funopfvb 6936. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafv2 48143	The second argument of a binary relation on a function is the function's value, analogous to funbrfv 6930. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵))
Theorem	fnbrafv2b 48144	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to fnbrfvb 6932. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹''''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	fnopafv2b 48145	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6933. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹''''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafv22b 48146	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to funbrfvb 6935. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	funopafv2b 48147	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to funopfvb 6936. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	dfatsnafv2 48148	Singleton of function value, analogous to fnsnfv 6961. (Contributed by AV, 7-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → {(𝐹''''𝐴)} = (𝐹 “ {𝐴}))
Theorem	dfafv23 48149*	A definition of function value in terms of iota, analogous to dffv3 6878. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})))
Theorem	dfatdmfcoafv2 48150	Domain of a function composition, analogous to dmfco 6978. (Contributed by AV, 7-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐺 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↔ (𝐺''''𝐴) ∈ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	dfatcolem 48151*	Lemma for dfatco 48152. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 defAt 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 defAt (𝐺''''𝑋)) → ∃!𝑦 𝑋(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)𝑦)
Theorem	dfatco 48152	The predicate "defined at" for a function composition. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 defAt 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 defAt (𝐺''''𝑋)) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) defAt 𝑋)
Theorem	afv2co2 48153	Value of a function composition, analogous to fvco2 6979. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 defAt 𝑋 ∧ 𝐹 defAt (𝐺''''𝑋)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)''''𝑋) = (𝐹''''(𝐺''''𝑋)))
Theorem	rlimdmafv2 48154	Two ways to express that a function has a limit, analogous to rlimdm 15642. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 ''''𝐹)))
Theorem	dfafv22 48155	Alternate definition of (𝐹''''𝐴) using (𝐹‘𝐴) directly. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹''''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	afv2ndeffv0 48156	If the alternate function value at an argument is undefined, i.e., not in the range of the function, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	dfatafv2eqfv 48157	If a function is defined at a class 𝐴, the alternate function value equals the function's value at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv2rnfveq 48158	If the alternate function value is defined, i.e., in the range of the function, the alternate function value equals the function's value. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv20fv0 48159	If the alternate function value at an argument is the empty set, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹''''𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afv2fvn0fveq 48160	If the function's value at an argument is not the empty set, it equals the alternate function value at this argument. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv2fv0 48161	If the function's value at an argument is the empty set, then the alternate function value at this argument is the empty set or undefined. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → ((𝐹''''𝐴) = ∅ ∨ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	afv2fv0b 48162	The function's value at an argument is the empty set if and only if the alternate function value at this argument is the empty set or undefined. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐹''''𝐴) = ∅ ∨ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	afv2fv0xorb 48163	If a set is in the range of a function, the function's value at an argument is the empty set if and only if the alternate function value at this argument is either the empty set or undefined. (Contributed by AV, 11-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (∅ ∈ ran 𝐹 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐹''''𝐴) = ∅ ⊻ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹)))
21.50.6  General auxiliary theorems (2)
21.50.6.1  Logical conjunction - extension
Theorem	an4com24 48164	Rearrangement of 4 conjuncts: second and forth positions interchanged. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
21.50.6.2  Abbreviated conjunction and disjunction of three wff's - extension
Theorem	3an4ancom24 48165	Commutative law for a conjunction with a triple conjunction: second and forth positions interchanged. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	4an21 48166	Rearrangement of 4 conjuncts with a triple conjunction. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
21.50.6.3  Negated membership (alternative)
Syntax	cnelbr 48167	Extend wff notation to include the 'not element of' relation.
class _∉
Definition	df-nelbr 48168*	Define negated membership as binary relation. Analogous to df-eprel 5559 (the membership relation). (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ _∉ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦}
Theorem	dfnelbr2 48169	Alternate definition of the negated membership as binary relation. (Proposed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ _∉ = ((V × V) ∖ E )
Theorem	nelbr 48170	The binary relation of a set not being a member of another set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nelbrim 48171	If a set is related to another set by the negated membership relation, then it is not a member of the other set. The other direction of the implication is not generally true, because if 𝐴 is a proper class, then ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 would be true, but not 𝐴 _∉ 𝐵. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelbrnel 48172	A set is related to another set by the negated membership relation iff it is not a member of the other set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵))
Theorem	nelbrnelim 48173	If a set is related to another set by the negated membership relation, then it is not a member of the other set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 _∉ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵)
21.50.6.4  The empty set - extension
Theorem	ralralimp 48174*	Selecting one of two alternatives within a restricted generalization if one of the alternatives is false. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)) ∧ ¬ 𝜃) → 𝜏))
21.50.6.5  Indexed union and intersection - extension
Theorem	otiunsndisjX 48175*	The union of singletons consisting of ordered triples which have distinct first and third components are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → Disj 𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑊 {⟨𝑎, 𝐵, 𝑐⟩})
21.50.6.6  Functions - extension
Theorem	fvifeq 48176	Equality of function values with conditional arguments, see also fvif 6898. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = if(𝜑, 𝐵, 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = if(𝜑, (𝐹‘𝐵), (𝐹‘𝐶)))
Theorem	rnfdmpr 48177	The range of a one-to-one function 𝐹 of an unordered pair into a set is the unordered pair of the function values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 Fn {𝑋, 𝑌} → ran 𝐹 = {(𝐹‘𝑋), (𝐹‘𝑌)}))
Theorem	imarnf1pr 48178	The image of the range of a function 𝐹 under a function 𝐸 if 𝐹 is a function from a pair into the domain of 𝐸. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) → (((𝐹:{𝑋, 𝑌}⟶dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝐸:dom 𝐸⟶𝑅) ∧ ((𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑌)) = 𝐵)) → (𝐸 “ ran 𝐹) = {𝐴, 𝐵}))
Theorem	funop1 48179*	A function is an ordered pair iff it is a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2020.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐹 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐹 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩}))
Theorem	fun2dmnopgexmpl 48180	A function with a domain containing (at least) two different elements is not an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 21-Sep-2020.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ (𝐺 = {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} → ¬ 𝐺 ∈ (V × V))
Theorem	opabresex0d 48181*	A collection of ordered pairs, the class of all possible second components being a set, with a restriction of a binary relation is a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜃} ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabbrfex0d 48182*	A collection of ordered pairs, the class of all possible second components being a set, is a set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜃} ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabresexd 48183*	A collection of ordered pairs, the second component being a function, with a restriction of a binary relation is a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑦:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabbrfexd 48184*	A collection of ordered pairs, the second component being a function, is a set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑦:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oresf1orab 48185*	Build a bijection by restricting the domain of a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷):𝐷–1-1-onto→{𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	f1oresf1o 48186*	Build a bijection by restricting the domain of a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷):𝐷–1-1-onto→{𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	f1oresf1o2 48187*	Build a bijection by restricting the domain of a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷):𝐷–1-1-onto→{𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
21.50.6.7  Maps-to notation - extension
Theorem	fvmptrab 48188*	Value of a function mapping a set to a class abstraction restricting a class depending on the argument of the function. More general version of fvmptrabfv 7023, but relying on the fact that out-of-domain arguments evaluate to the empty set, which relies on set.mm's particular encoding. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑀 = 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑁 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑋 ∉ 𝑉 → 𝑁 = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	fvmptrabdm 48189*	Value of a function mapping a set to a class abstraction restricting the value of another function. See also fvmptrabfv 7023. (Suggested by BJ, 18-Feb-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑌) ∣ 𝜑})    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ dom 𝐺 → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑌) ∣ 𝜓}
21.50.6.8  Subtraction - extension
Theorem	cnambpcma 48190	((a-b)+c)-a = c-a holds for complex numbers a,b,c. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Mar-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 𝐶) − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	cnapbmcpd 48191	((a+b)-c)+d = ((a+d)+b)-c holds for complex numbers a,b,c,d. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) + 𝐷) = (((𝐴 + 𝐷) + 𝐵) − 𝐶))
Theorem	addsubeq0 48192	The sum of two complex numbers is equal to the difference of these two complex numbers iff the subtrahend is 0. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 − 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = 0))
21.50.6.9  Ordering on reals (cont.) - extension
Theorem	leaddsuble 48193	Addition and subtraction on one side of "less than or equal to". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Mar-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) − 𝐶) ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	2leaddle2 48194	If two real numbers are less than a third real number, the sum of the real numbers is less than twice the third real number. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-May-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (2 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	ltnltne 48195	Variant of trichotomy law for 'less than'. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
Theorem	p1lep2 48196	A real number increasd by 1 is less than or equal to the number increased by 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℝ → (𝑁 + 1) ≤ (𝑁 + 2))
Theorem	ltsubsubaddltsub 48197	If the result of subtracting two numbers is greater than a number, the result of adding one of these subtracted numbers to the number is less than the result of subtracting the other subtracted number only. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Jun-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐿 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐽 < ((𝐿 − 𝑀) − 𝑁) ↔ (𝐽 + 𝑀) < (𝐿 − 𝑁)))
Theorem	zm1nn 48198	An integer minus 1 is positive under certain circumstances. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Jun-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐽 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐽 ∧ 𝐽 < ((𝐿 − 𝑁) − 1)) → (𝐿 − 1) ∈ ℕ))
21.50.6.10  Imaginary and complex number properties - extension
Theorem	readdcnnred 48199	The sum of a real number and an imaginary number is not a real number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∉ ℝ)
Theorem	resubcnnred 48200	The difference of a real number and an imaginary number is not a real number. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ℂ ∖ ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∉ ℝ)