Theorem dfres3 5984

Description: Alternate definition of restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfres3	⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem dfres3

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-res 5674	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × V))
2		eleq1 2857	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
3		vex 3467	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
4	3	biantru 538	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V))
5		vex 3467	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
6	5, 3	opelrn 5934	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)
7	6	biantrud 540	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
8	4, 7	bitr3id 288	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
9	2, 8	biimtrdi 256	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
10	9	com12 33	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
11	10	pm5.32d 587	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
12	11	2exbidv 1951	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
13		elxp 5685	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)))
14		elxp 5685	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr4g 317	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
16	15	pm5.32i 584	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
17		elin 3929	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
18	16, 17	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
19	18	ineqri 4173	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × V)) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))
20	1, 19	eqtri 2792	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567  ∃wex 1806   ∈ wcel 2149  Vcvv 3463   ∩ cin 3912  ⟨cop 4600   × cxp 5660  ran crn 5663   ↾ cres 5664

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5261  ax-pr 5405

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-xp 5668  df-cnv 5670  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674

This theorem is referenced by:  brrestrict  36340  dfrel6  38886