Theorem dfres3 5983

Description: Alternate definition of restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfres3	⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem dfres3

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-res 5673	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × V))
2		eleq1 2851	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
3		vex 3459	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
4	3	biantru 538	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V))
5		vex 3459	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
6	5, 3	opelrn 5933	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)
7	6	biantrud 540	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
8	4, 7	bitr3id 288	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
9	2, 8	biimtrdi 256	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
10	9	com12 33	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
11	10	pm5.32d 587	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
12	11	2exbidv 1954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
13		elxp 5684	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)))
14		elxp 5684	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr4g 317	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
16	15	pm5.32i 584	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
17		elin 3921	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
18	16, 17	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
19	18	ineqri 4165	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × V)) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))
20	1, 19	eqtri 2786	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1809   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455   ∩ cin 3904  ⟨cop 4595   × cxp 5659  ran crn 5662   ↾ cres 5663

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-xp 5667  df-cnv 5669  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673

This theorem is referenced by:  brrestrict  36441  dfrel6  39016