Theorem dfres3 5970

Description: Alternate definition of restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfres3	⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem dfres3

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-res 5659	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × V))
2		eleq1 2850	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
3		vex 3458	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
4	3	biantru 537	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V))
5		vex 3458	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
6	5, 3	opelrn 5919	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)
7	6	biantrud 539	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
8	4, 7	bitr3id 287	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
9	2, 8	biimtrdi 255	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
10	9	com12 32	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
11	10	pm5.32d 585	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
12	11	2exbidv 1944	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴))))
13		elxp 5670	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V)))
14		elxp 5670	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐴)))
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr4g 316	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
16	15	pm5.32i 582	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
17		elin 3920	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
18	16, 17	bitr4i 280	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × V)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)))
19	18	ineqri 4164	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × V)) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))
20	1, 19	eqtri 2785	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1560  ∃wex 1799   ∈ wcel 2142  Vcvv 3454   ∩ cin 3903  ⟨cop 4588   × cxp 5645  ran crn 5648   ↾ cres 5649

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-sb 2091  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-xp 5653  df-cnv 5655  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659

This theorem is referenced by:  brrestrict  36299  dfrel6  38846