| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 60 of 497) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30845) |
(30846-32368) |
(32369-49617) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dmi 5901 | The domain of the identity relation is the universe. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ dom I = V | ||
| Theorem | dmv 5902 | The domain of the universe is the universe. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2003.) |
| ⊢ dom V = V | ||
| Theorem | dmep 5903 | The domain of the membership relation is the universal class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 26-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ dom E = V | ||
| Theorem | dm0rn0 5904 | An empty domain is equivalent to an empty range. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ran 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | rn0 5905 | The range of the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.8(v) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
| ⊢ ran ∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | rnep 5906 | The range of the membership relation is the universal class minus the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ran E = (V ∖ {∅}) | ||
| Theorem | reldm0 5907 | A relation is empty iff its domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ dom 𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dmxp 5908 | The domain of a Cartesian product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2141, ax-11 2157, ax-12 2177. (Revised by SN, 12-Aug-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dmxpOLD 5909 | Obsolete version of dmxp 5908 as of 19-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → dom (𝐴 × 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dmxpid 5910 | The domain of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-1995.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmxpin 5911 | The domain of the intersection of two Cartesian squares. Unlike in dmin 5891, equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2008.) |
| ⊢ dom ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xpid11 5912 | The Cartesian square is a one-to-one construction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmcnvcnv 5913 | The domain of the double converse of a class is equal to its domain (even when that class in not a relation, in which case dfrel2 6178 gives another proof). (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ dom ◡◡𝐴 = dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rncnvcnv 5914 | The range of the double converse of a class is equal to its range (even when that class in not a relation). (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ ran ◡◡𝐴 = ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | elreldm 5915 | The first member of an ordered pair in a relation belongs to the domain of the relation (see op1stb 5446). (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∩ ∩ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | rneq 5916 | Equality theorem for range. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ran 𝐴 = ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rneqi 5917 | Equality inference for range. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐴 = ran 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rneqd 5918 | Equality deduction for range. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐴 = ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnss 5919 | Subset theorem for range. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnssi 5920 | Subclass inference for range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | brelrng 5921 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴𝐶𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | brelrn 5922 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐶𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | opelrn 5923 | Membership of second member of an ordered pair in a range. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | releldm 5924 | The first argument of a binary relation belongs to its domain. Note that 𝐴𝑅𝐵 does not imply Rel 𝑅: see for example nrelv 5779 and brv 5447. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relelrn 5925 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | releldmb 5926* | Membership in a domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | relelrnb 5927* | Membership in a range. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝑅𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | releldmi 5928 | The first argument of a binary relation belongs to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relelrni 5929 | The second argument of a binary relation belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfrnf 5930* | Definition of range, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
| Theorem | nfdm 5931 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | nfrn 5932 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for range. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmiin 5933 | Domain of an intersection. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ dom ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 dom 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rnopab 5934* | The range of a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ran {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | rnopabss 5935* | Upper bound for the range of a restricted class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ ran {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rnopab3 5936* | The range of a restricted class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ran {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | rnmpt 5937* | The range of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐹 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpt 5938* | The range of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpt1s 5939* | Elementhood in an image set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐷 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpt1 5940 | Elementhood in an image set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmptg 5941* | Membership in the range of a function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpti 5942* | Membership in the range of a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmptd 5943* | The range of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpt1d 5944 | Elementhood in an image set. Deducion version of elrnmpt1 5940. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmptdv 5945* | Elementhood in the range of a function in maps-to notation, deduction form. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐶) → 𝐷 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpt2d 5946* | Elementhood in the range of a function in maps-to notation, deduction form. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfiun3g 5947 | Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfiin3g 5948 | Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfiun3 5949 | Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfiin3 5950 | Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | riinint 5951* | Express a relative indexed intersection as an intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆) = ∩ ({𝑋} ∪ ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | relrn0 5952 | A relation is empty iff its range is empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ran 𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dmrnssfld 5953 | The domain and range of a class are included in its double union. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmcoss 5954 | Domain of a composition. Theorem 21 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rncoss 5955 | Range of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmcosseq 5956 | Domain of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-11 2157. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmcosseqOLD 5957 | Obsolete version of dmcosseq 5956 as of 23-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmcoeq 5958 | Domain of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ran 𝐵 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rncoeq 5959 | Range of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ran 𝐵 → ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ran 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | reseq1 5960 | Equality theorem for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq2 5961 | Equality theorem for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq1i 5962 | Equality inference for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | reseq2i 5963 | Equality inference for restrictions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | reseq12i 5964 | Equality inference for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | reseq1d 5965 | Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq2d 5966 | Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq12d 5967 | Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | nfres 5968 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | csbres 5969 | Distribute proper substitution through the restriction of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | res0 5970 | A restriction to the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | dfres3 5971 | Alternate definition of restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | opelres 5972 | Ordered pair elementhood in a restriction. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1995.) (Revised by BJ, 18-Feb-2022.) Commute the consequent. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | brres 5973 | Binary relation on a restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Nov-2015.) Commute the consequent. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | opelresi 5974 | Ordered pair membership in a restriction. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | brresi 5975 | Binary relation on a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | opres 5976 | Ordered pair membership in a restriction when the first member belongs to the restricting class. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐷) ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resieq 5977 | A restricted identity relation is equivalent to equality in its domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵( I ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | opelidres 5978 | 〈𝐴, 𝐴〉 belongs to a restriction of the identity class iff 𝐴 belongs to the restricting class. (Contributed by FL, 27-Oct-2008.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (〈𝐴, 𝐴〉 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resres 5979 | The restriction of a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resundi 5980 | Distributive law for restriction over union. Theorem 31 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resundir 5981 | Distributive law for restriction over union. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resindi 5982 | Class restriction distributes over intersection. (Contributed by FL, 6-Oct-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resindir 5983 | Class restriction distributes over intersection. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | inres 5984 | Move intersection into class restriction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resdifcom 5985 | Commutative law for restriction and difference. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resiun1 5986* | Distribution of restriction over indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resiun2 5987* | Distribution of restriction over indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ↾ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resss 5988 | A class includes its restriction. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rescom 5989 | Commutative law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssres 5990 | Subclass theorem for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ssres2 5991 | Subclass theorem for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | relres 5992 | A restriction is a relation. Exercise 12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resabs1 5993 | Absorption law for restriction. Exercise 17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resabs1i 5994 | Absorption law for restriction. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resabs1d 5995 | Absorption law for restriction, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resabs2 5996 | Absorption law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | residm 5997 | Idempotent law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmresss 5998 | The domain of a restriction is a subset of the original domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) Proof shortened and axiom usage reduced. (Proof shortened by AV, 15-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmres 5999 | The domain of a restriction. Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdmres 6000 | A domain restricted to a subclass equals the subclass. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐵 ↔ dom (𝐵 ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |