| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 60 of 499) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30893) |
(30894-32416) |
(32417-49836) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | elrnmptg 5901* | Membership in the range of a function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpti 5902* | Membership in the range of a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmptd 5903* | The range of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpt1d 5904 | Elementhood in an image set. Deducion version of elrnmpt1 5900. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmptdv 5905* | Elementhood in the range of a function in maps-to notation, deduction form. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐶) → 𝐷 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | elrnmpt2d 5906* | Elementhood in the range of a function in maps-to notation, deduction form. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfiun3g 5907 | Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfiin3g 5908 | Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dfiun3 5909 | Alternate definition of indexed union when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfiin3 5910 | Alternate definition of indexed intersection when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | riinint 5911* | Express a relative indexed intersection as an intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆) = ∩ ({𝑋} ∪ ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | relrn0 5912 | A relation is empty iff its range is empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ran 𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | dmrnssfld 5913 | The domain and range of a class are included in its double union. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴) ⊆ ∪ ∪ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmcoss 5914 | Domain of a composition. Theorem 21 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2144 and ax-12 2180. (Revised by TM, 31-Dec-2025.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | dmcossOLD 5915 | Obsolete version of dmcosseq 5917 as of 31-Dec-2025. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | rncoss 5916 | Range of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmcosseq 5917 | Domain of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-11 2160. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Jun-2025.) Avoid ax-10 2144 and ax-12 2180. (Revised by TM, 31-Dec-2025.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmcosseqOLD 5918 | Obsolete version of dmcosseq 5917 as of 31-Dec-2025. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-11 2160. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmcosseqOLDOLD 5919 | Obsolete version of dmcosseq 5917 as of 23-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ dom 𝐴 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmcoeq 5920 | Domain of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ran 𝐵 → dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = dom 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rncoeq 5921 | Range of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 = ran 𝐵 → ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ran 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | reseq1 5922 | Equality theorem for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq2 5923 | Equality theorem for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq1i 5924 | Equality inference for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | reseq2i 5925 | Equality inference for restrictions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | reseq12i 5926 | Equality inference for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | reseq1d 5927 | Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq2d 5928 | Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reseq12d 5929 | Equality deduction for restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | nfres 5930 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | csbres 5931 | Distribute proper substitution through the restriction of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | res0 5932 | A restriction to the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | dfres3 5933 | Alternate definition of restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × ran 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | opelres 5934 | Ordered pair elementhood in a restriction. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1995.) (Revised by BJ, 18-Feb-2022.) Commute the consequent. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | brres 5935 | Binary relation on a restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Nov-2015.) Commute the consequent. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | opelresi 5936 | Ordered pair membership in a restriction. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | brresi 5937 | Binary relation on a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | opres 5938 | Ordered pair membership in a restriction when the first member belongs to the restricting class. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐷) ↔ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resieq 5939 | A restricted identity relation is equivalent to equality in its domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵( I ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | opelidres 5940 | 〈𝐴, 𝐴〉 belongs to a restriction of the identity class iff 𝐴 belongs to the restricting class. (Contributed by FL, 27-Oct-2008.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (〈𝐴, 𝐴〉 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resres 5941 | The restriction of a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resundi 5942 | Distributive law for restriction over union. Theorem 31 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resundir 5943 | Distributive law for restriction over union. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resindi 5944 | Class restriction distributes over intersection. (Contributed by FL, 6-Oct-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resindir 5945 | Class restriction distributes over intersection. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | inres 5946 | Move intersection into class restriction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resdifcom 5947 | Commutative law for restriction and difference. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resiun1 5948* | Distribution of restriction over indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resiun2 5949* | Distribution of restriction over indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ↾ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resss 5950 | A class includes its restriction. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | rescom 5951 | Commutative law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssres 5952 | Subclass theorem for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ssres2 5953 | Subclass theorem for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | relres 5954 | A restriction is a relation. Exercise 12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resabs1 5955 | Absorption law for restriction. Exercise 17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resabs1i 5956 | Absorption law for restriction. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resabs1d 5957 | Absorption law for restriction, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resabs2 5958 | Absorption law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | residm 5959 | Idempotent law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmresss 5960 | The domain of a restriction is a subset of the original domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) Proof shortened and axiom usage reduced. (Proof shortened by AV, 15-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmres 5961 | The domain of a restriction. Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ssdmres 5962 | A domain restricted to a subclass equals the subclass. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐵 ↔ dom (𝐵 ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dmresexg 5963 | The domain of a restriction to a set exists. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | resima 5964 | A restriction to an image. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | resima2 5965 | Image under a restricted class. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) “ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | rnresss 5966 | The range of a restriction is a subset of the whole range. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | xpssres 5967 | Restriction of a constant function (or other Cartesian product). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐶 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elinxp 5968* | Membership in an intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | elres 5969* | Membership in a restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elsnres 5970* | Membership in restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↾ {𝐶}) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴 = 〈𝐶, 𝑦〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | relssres 5971 | Simplification law for restriction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dmressnsn 5972 | The domain of a restriction to a singleton is a singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) = {𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | eldmressnsn 5973 | The element of the domain of a restriction to a singleton is the element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → 𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | eldmeldmressn 5974 | An element of the domain (of a relation) is an element of the domain of the restriction (of the relation) to the singleton containing this element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ↾ {𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | resdm 5975 | A relation restricted to its domain equals itself. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↾ dom 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | resexg 5976 | The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | resexd 5977 | The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | resex 5978 | The restriction of a set is a set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | resindm 5979 | When restricting a relation, intersecting with the domain of the relation has no effect. (Contributed by FL, 6-Oct-2008.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resdmdfsn 5980 | Restricting a relation to its domain without a set is the same as restricting the relation to the universe without this set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ (V ∖ {𝑋})) = (𝑅 ↾ (dom 𝑅 ∖ {𝑋}))) | ||
| Theorem | reldisjun 5981 | Split a relation into two disjoint parts based on its domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ dom 𝑅 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → 𝑅 = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | relresdm1 5982 | Restriction of a disjoint union to the domain of the first term. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (dom 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐵) = ∅) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↾ dom 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | resopab 5983* | Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | ||
| Theorem | iss 5984 | A subclass of the identity function is the identity function restricted to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ↾ dom 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | resopab2 5985* | Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | resmpt 5986* | Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resmpt3 5987* | Unconditional restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | resmptf 5988 | Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resmptd 5989* | Restriction of the mapping operation, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dfres2 5990* | Alternate definition of the restriction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)} | ||
| Theorem | mptss 5991* | Sufficient condition for inclusion among two functions in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | elimampt 5992* | Membership in the image of a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | elidinxp 5993* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝐶 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | elidinxpid 5994* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | elrid 5995* | Characterization of the elements of a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
| Theorem | idinxpres 5996 | The intersection of the identity relation with a cartesian product is the restriction of the identity relation to the intersection of the factors. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) Generalize statement from cartesian square (now idinxpresid 5997) to cartesian product. (Revised by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | idinxpresid 5997 | The intersection of the identity relation with the cartesian square of a class is the restriction of the identity relation to that class. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
| ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | idssxp 5998 | A diagonal set as a subset of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 9-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | opabresid 5999* | The restricted identity relation expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)} | ||
| Theorem | mptresid 6000* | The restricted identity relation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |