Theorem dftrrel2 39288

Description: Alternate definition of the transitive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftrrel2	⊢ ( TrRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem dftrrel2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-trrel 39285	. 2 ⊢ ( TrRel 𝑅 ↔ (((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
2		dfrel6 38974	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
3	2	biimpi 219	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
4	3, 3	coeq12d 5852	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))) = (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅))
5	4, 3	sseq12d 3971	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅))
6	5	pm5.32ri 585	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
7	1, 6	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ( TrRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∩ cin 3905   ⊆ wss 3906   × cxp 5661  dom cdm 5663  ran crn 5664   ∘ ccom 5667  Rel wrel 5668   TrRel wtrrel 38825

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-pr 5406

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-trrel 39285

This theorem is referenced by:  dftrrel3  39289  eltrrelsrel  39292  trreleq  39293  dfeqvrel2  39301