Theorem ecin0 38851

Description: Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have no elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Dec-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecin0	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑊

Proof of Theorem ecin0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		disj1 4406	. 2 ⊢ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅))
2		elecg 8723	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
3	2	el2v1 38728	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
4	3	adantr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
5		elecALTV 38770	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
6	5	elvd 3460	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
7	6	adantl 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
8	7	notbid 320	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
9	4, 8	imbi12d 346	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
10	9	albidv 1940	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
11	1, 10	bitrid 285	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1558   = wceq 1560   ∈ wcel 2142  Vcvv 3454   ∩ cin 3903  ∅c0 4285   class class class wbr 5100  [cec 8676

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-sb 2091  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-xp 5653  df-cnv 5655  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-ec 8680

This theorem is referenced by:  ecinn0  38852