Theorem ecin0 39001

Description: Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have no elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Dec-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecin0	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑊

Proof of Theorem ecin0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		disj1 4412	. 2 ⊢ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅))
2		elecg 8735	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
3	2	el2v1 38878	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
4	3	adantr 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
5		elecALTV 38920	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
6	5	elvd 3461	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
7	6	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
8	7	notbid 321	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
9	4, 8	imbi12d 347	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
10	9	albidv 1950	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
11	1, 10	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455   ∩ cin 3904  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5109  [cec 8688

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-xp 5667  df-cnv 5669  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-ec 8692

This theorem is referenced by:  ecinn0  39002