Theorem ecin0 36484

Description: Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have no elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Dec-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecin0	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑊

Proof of Theorem ecin0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		disj1 4384	. 2 ⊢ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅))
2		elecg 8541	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
3	2	el2v1 36370	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
4	3	adantr 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
5		elecALTV 36405	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
6	5	elvd 3439	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
7	6	adantl 482	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
8	7	notbid 318	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
9	4, 8	imbi12d 345	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
10	9	albidv 1923	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
11	1, 10	syl5bb 283	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3432   ∩ cin 3886  ∅c0 4256   class class class wbr 5074  [cec 8496

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-xp 5595  df-cnv 5597  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-ec 8500

This theorem is referenced by:  ecinn0  36485