Mathbox for Peter Mazsa |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > ecinn0 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have some elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jan-2019.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ecinn0 | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ecin0 36221 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) | |
2 | 1 | necon3abid 2977 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) |
3 | notnotb 318 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥) | |
4 | 3 | anbi2i 626 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ ¬ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)) |
5 | 4 | exbii 1855 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ ¬ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)) |
6 | exanali 1867 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ ¬ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | bitri 278 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)) |
8 | 2, 7 | bitr4di 292 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 ∀wal 1541 ∃wex 1787 ∈ wcel 2110 ≠ wne 2940 ∩ cin 3865 ∅c0 4237 class class class wbr 5053 [cec 8389 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1976 ax-7 2016 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5192 ax-nul 5199 ax-pr 5322 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 848 df-3an 1091 df-tru 1546 df-fal 1556 df-ex 1788 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-ne 2941 df-ral 3066 df-rex 3067 df-rab 3070 df-v 3410 df-dif 3869 df-un 3871 df-in 3873 df-nul 4238 df-if 4440 df-sn 4542 df-pr 4544 df-op 4548 df-br 5054 df-opab 5116 df-xp 5557 df-cnv 5559 df-dm 5561 df-rn 5562 df-res 5563 df-ima 5564 df-ec 8393 |
This theorem is referenced by: brcoss3 36293 brcosscnv2 36328 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |