Theorem brcoss3 38055

Description: Alternate form of the 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Mar-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brcoss3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅))

Proof of Theorem brcoss3

Dummy variable 𝑢 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brcnvg 5882	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐴))
2	1	elvd 3468	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐴))
3		brcnvg 5882	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ V) → (𝐵◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐵))
4	3	elvd 3468	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐵◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐵))
5	2, 4	bi2anan9 636	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ∧ 𝐵◡𝑅𝑢) ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
6	5	exbidv 1916	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ∧ 𝐵◡𝑅𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
7		ecinn0 37975	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑢(𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ∧ 𝐵◡𝑅𝑢)))
8		brcoss 38053	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4rd 311	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098   ≠ wne 2929  Vcvv 3461   ∩ cin 3943  ∅c0 4322   class class class wbr 5149  ^◡ccnv 5677  [cec 8723   ≀ ccoss 37799

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-ext 2696  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pr 5429

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2703  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2802  df-ne 2930  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3419  df-v 3463  df-dif 3947  df-un 3949  df-in 3951  df-ss 3961  df-nul 4323  df-if 4531  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-xp 5684  df-cnv 5686  df-dm 5688  df-rn 5689  df-res 5690  df-ima 5691  df-ec 8727  df-coss 38033

This theorem is referenced by:  br2coss  38060  trcoss2  38106