Theorem brcoss3 38434

Description: Alternate form of the 𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by 𝑅 binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Mar-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brcoss3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅))

Proof of Theorem brcoss3

Dummy variable 𝑢 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brcnvg 5890	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ V) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐴))
2	1	elvd 3486	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐴))
3		brcnvg 5890	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ V) → (𝐵◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐵))
4	3	elvd 3486	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐵◡𝑅𝑢 ↔ 𝑢𝑅𝐵))
5	2, 4	bi2anan9 638	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ∧ 𝐵◡𝑅𝑢) ↔ (𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
6	5	exbidv 1921	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ∧ 𝐵◡𝑅𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
7		ecinn0 38354	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑢(𝐴◡𝑅𝑢 ∧ 𝐵◡𝑅𝑢)))
8		brcoss 38432	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4rd 312	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2940  Vcvv 3480   ∩ cin 3950  ∅c0 4333   class class class wbr 5143  ^◡ccnv 5684  [cec 8743   ≀ ccoss 38182

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5296  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5432

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-in 3958  df-ss 3968  df-nul 4334  df-if 4526  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-xp 5691  df-cnv 5693  df-dm 5695  df-rn 5696  df-res 5697  df-ima 5698  df-ec 8747  df-coss 38412

This theorem is referenced by:  br2coss  38439  trcoss2  38485