Theorem disjecxrn 39081

Description: Two ways of saying that (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-cosets are disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjecxrn	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))

Proof of Theorem disjecxrn

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecxrn 39075	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)})
2		ecxrn 39075	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)})
3	1, 2	ineqan12d 4175	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)} ∩ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)}))
4		inopab 5816	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)} ∩ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)}) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))}
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))})
6		an4 668	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
7	6	opabbii 5178	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))}
8	5, 7	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))})
9	8	neeq1d 3017	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} ≠ ∅))
10		opabn0 5538	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
11	9, 10	bitrdi 290	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
12		exdistrv 1985	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
13	11, 12	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
14		ecinn0 39022	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦)))
15		ecinn0 39022	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
16	14, 15	anbi12d 643	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
17	13, 16	bitr4d 285	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅)))
18		neanior 3051	. . 3 ⊢ ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅) ↔ ¬ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅))
19	17, 18	bitrdi 290	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))
20	19	necon4abid 2998	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1809   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958   ∩ cin 3904  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5109  {copab 5173  [cec 8688   ⋉ cxrn 38843

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-fo 6542  df-fv 6544  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-ec 8692  df-xrn 39049

This theorem is referenced by:  disjecxrncnvep  39082