Theorem disjecxrn 38382

Description: Two ways of saying that (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-cosets are disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjecxrn	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))

Proof of Theorem disjecxrn

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecxrn 38380	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)})
2		ecxrn 38380	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)})
3	1, 2	ineqan12d 4188	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)} ∩ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)}))
4		inopab 5795	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)} ∩ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)}) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))}
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2781	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))})
6		an4 656	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
7	6	opabbii 5177	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))}
8	5, 7	eqtrdi 2781	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))})
9	8	neeq1d 2985	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} ≠ ∅))
10		opabn0 5516	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
11	9, 10	bitrdi 287	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
12		exdistrv 1955	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
13	11, 12	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
14		ecinn0 38342	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦)))
15		ecinn0 38342	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
16	14, 15	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
17	13, 16	bitr4d 282	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅)))
18		neanior 3019	. . 3 ⊢ ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅) ↔ ¬ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅))
19	17, 18	bitrdi 287	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))
20	19	necon4abid 2966	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926   ∩ cin 3916  ∅c0 4299   class class class wbr 5110  {copab 5172  [cec 8672   ⋉ cxrn 38175

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5536  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-res 5653  df-ima 5654  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-f 6518  df-fo 6520  df-fv 6522  df-1st 7971  df-2nd 7972  df-ec 8676  df-xrn 38360

This theorem is referenced by:  disjecxrncnvep  38383