Theorem disjecxrn 38371

Description: Two ways of saying that (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-cosets are disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjecxrn	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))

Proof of Theorem disjecxrn

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecxrn 38369	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)})
2		ecxrn 38369	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)})
3	1, 2	ineqan12d 4230	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)} ∩ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)}))
4		inopab 5842	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)} ∩ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)}) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))}
5	3, 4	eqtrdi 2791	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))})
6		an4 656	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)) ↔ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
7	6	opabbii 5215	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧) ∧ (𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))}
8	5, 7	eqtrdi 2791	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))})
9	8	neeq1d 2998	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} ≠ ∅))
10		opabn0 5563	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
11	9, 10	bitrdi 287	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
12		exdistrv 1953	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ (𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
13	11, 12	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
14		ecinn0 38335	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦)))
15		ecinn0 38335	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
16	14, 15	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑆𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))))
17	13, 16	bitr4d 282	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅)))
18		neanior 3033	. . 3 ⊢ ((([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ∧ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) ≠ ∅) ↔ ¬ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅))
19	17, 18	bitrdi 287	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))
20	19	necon4abid 2979	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1776   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2938   ∩ cin 3962  ∅c0 4339   class class class wbr 5148  {copab 5210  [cec 8742   ⋉ cxrn 38161

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5583  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-fo 6569  df-fv 6571  df-1st 8013  df-2nd 8014  df-ec 8746  df-xrn 38353

This theorem is referenced by:  disjecxrncnvep  38372