Theorem ercnv 8742

Description: The converse of an equivalence relation is itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ercnv	⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)

Proof of Theorem ercnv

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		errel 8730	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → Rel 𝑅)
2		relcnv 6099	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅
3		id 23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)
4	3	ersymb 8735	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
5		vex 3454	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6		vex 3454	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
7	5, 6	brcnv 5859	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
8		df-br 5103	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅)
9	7, 8	bitr3i 280	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅)
10		df-br 5103	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
11	4, 9, 10	3bitr3g 316	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
12	11	eqrelrdv2 5770	. . 3 ⊢ (((Rel ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 Er 𝐴) → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
13	2, 12	mpanl1 713	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 Er 𝐴) → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
14	1, 13	mpancom 701	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ⟨cop 4834   class class class wbr 5102  ^◡ccnv 5649  Rel wrel 5655   Er wer 8717

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-er 8720

This theorem is used by:  errn  8743  prjspeclsp  43733