Theorem ercnv 8770

Description: The converse of an equivalence relation is itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ercnv	⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)

Proof of Theorem ercnv

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		errel 8758	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → Rel 𝑅)
2		relcnv 6113	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅
3		id 23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)
4	3	ersymb 8763	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
5		vex 3458	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6		vex 3458	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
7	5, 6	brcnv 5868	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
8		df-br 5107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅)
9	7, 8	bitr3i 280	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅)
10		df-br 5107	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
11	4, 9, 10	3bitr3g 316	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
12	11	eqrelrdv2 5777	. . 3 ⊢ (((Rel ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 Er 𝐴) → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
13	2, 12	mpanl1 713	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 Er 𝐴) → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
14	1, 13	mpancom 701	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106  ^◡ccnv 5655  Rel wrel 5661   Er wer 8745

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-pr 5396

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-er 8748

This theorem is used by:  errn  8771  prjspeclsp  43844