P. 88 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8701-8800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ordtypelem9 8701*	Lemma for ordtype 8707. Either the function OrdIso is an isomorphism onto all of 𝐴, or OrdIso is not a set, which by oif 8705 implies that either ran 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐴 is a proper class or dom 𝑂 = On. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝑂, 𝐴))
Theorem	ordtypelem10 8702*	Lemma for ordtype 8707. Using ax-rep 4995, exclude the possibility that 𝑂 is a proper class and does not enumerate all of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑗 ∈ ran ℎ 𝑗𝑅𝑤}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (ℎ ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑣 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)𝑧𝑅𝑡}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝑂, 𝐴))
Theorem	oi0 8703	Definition of the ordinal isomorphism when its arguments are not meaningful. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 = ∅)
Theorem	oicl 8704	The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ Ord dom 𝐹
Theorem	oif 8705	The order isomorphism of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴
Theorem	oiiso2 8706	The order isomorphism of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an isomorphism onto ran 𝑂 (which is a subset of 𝐴 by oif 8705). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, ran 𝐹))
Theorem	ordtype 8707	For any set-like well-ordered class, there is an isomorphic ordinal number called its order type. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, 𝐴))
Theorem	oiiniseg 8708	ran 𝐹 is an initial segment of 𝐴 under the well-order 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ dom 𝐹)) → ((𝐹‘𝑀)𝑅𝑁 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	ordtype2 8709	For any set-like well-ordered class, if the order isomorphism exists (is a set), then it maps some ordinal onto 𝐴 isomorphically. Otherwise, 𝐹 is a proper class, which implies that either ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 is a proper class or dom 𝐹 = On. This weak version of ordtype 8707 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, 𝐴))
Theorem	oiexg 8710	The order isomorphism on a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	oion 8711	The order type of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 ∈ On)
Theorem	oiiso 8712	The order isomorphism of the well-order 𝑅 on 𝐴 is an isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝐹 Isom E , 𝑅 (dom 𝐹, 𝐴))
Theorem	oien 8713	The order type of a well-ordered set is equinumerous to the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	oieu 8714	Uniqueness of the unique ordinal isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 Isom E , 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) ↔ (𝐵 = dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 = 𝐹)))
Theorem	oismo 8715	When 𝐴 is a subclass of On, 𝐹 is a strictly monotone ordinal functions, and it is also complete (it is an isomorphism onto all of 𝐴). The proof avoids ax-rep 4995 (the second statement is trivial under ax-rep 4995). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso( E , 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (Smo 𝐹 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐴))
Theorem	oiid 8716	The order type of an ordinal under the ∈ order is itself, and the order isomorphism is the identity function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → OrdIso( E , 𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	hartogslem1 8717*	Lemma for hartogs 8719. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑟, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (((dom 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟)) ∧ (𝑟 ∖ I ) We dom 𝑟) ∧ 𝑦 = dom OrdIso((𝑟 ∖ I ), dom 𝑟))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑠 = (𝑓‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑡 = (𝑓‘𝑧)) ∧ 𝑤 E 𝑧)}    ⇒   ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ 𝐴}))
Theorem	hartogslem2 8718*	Lemma for hartogs 8719. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑟, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (((dom 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (dom 𝑟 × dom 𝑟)) ∧ (𝑟 ∖ I ) We dom 𝑟) ∧ 𝑦 = dom OrdIso((𝑟 ∖ I ), dom 𝑟))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑠 = (𝑓‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑡 = (𝑓‘𝑧)) ∧ 𝑤 E 𝑧)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ 𝐴} ∈ V)
Theorem	hartogs 8719*	Given any set, the Hartogs number of the set is the least ordinal not dominated by that set. This theorem proves that there is always an ordinal which satisfies this. (This theorem can be proven trivially using the AC - see theorem ondomon 9701- but this proof works in ZF.) (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ 𝐴} ∈ On)
Theorem	wofib 8720	The only sets which are well-ordered forwards and backwards are finite sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ↔ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	wemaplem1 8721*	Value of the lexicographic order on a sequence space. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑃𝑇𝑄 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑃‘𝑎)𝑆(𝑄‘𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑏𝑅𝑎 → (𝑃‘𝑏) = (𝑄‘𝑏)))))
Theorem	wemaplem2 8722*	Lemma for wemapso 8726. Transitivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑎)𝑆(𝑋‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐𝑅𝑎 → (𝑃‘𝑐) = (𝑋‘𝑐)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋‘𝑏)𝑆(𝑄‘𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐𝑅𝑏 → (𝑋‘𝑐) = (𝑄‘𝑐)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃𝑇𝑄)
Theorem	wemaplem3 8723*	Lemma for wemapso 8726. Transitivity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Po 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃𝑇𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑇𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃𝑇𝑄)
Theorem	wemappo 8724*	Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a well-ordering of the indices and a total ordering of the values. Without totality on the values or least differing indices, the best we can prove here is a partial order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))
Theorem	wemapsolem 8725*	Lemma for wemapso 8726. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Or 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏)) → ∃𝑐 ∈ dom (𝑎 ∖ 𝑏)∀𝑑 ∈ dom (𝑎 ∖ 𝑏) ¬ 𝑑𝑅𝑐)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Or 𝑈)
Theorem	wemapso 8726*	Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a well-ordering of the indices and a total ordering of the values. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) → 𝑇 Or (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴))
Theorem	wemapso2lem 8727*	Lemma for wemapso2 8728. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑇 Or 𝑈)
Theorem	wemapso2 8728*	An alternative to having a well-order on 𝑅 in wemapso 8726 is to restrict the function set to finitely-supported functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐵) → 𝑇 Or 𝑈)
Theorem	card2on 8729*	The alternate definition of the cardinal of a set given in cardval2 9131 always gives a set, and indeed an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jan-2013.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴} ∈ On
Theorem	card2inf 8730*	The alternate definition of the cardinal of a set given in cardval2 9131 has the curious property that for non-numerable sets (for which ndmfv 6464 yields ∅), it still evaluates to a nonempty set, and indeed it contains ω. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑦 ≈ 𝐴 → ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴})
2.4.33  Hartogs function, order types, weak dominance
Syntax	char 8731	Class symbol for the Hartogs/cardinal successor function.
class har
Syntax	cwdom 8732	Class symbol for the weak dominance relation.
class ≼*
Definition	df-har 8733*	Define the Hartogs function , which maps all sets to the smallest ordinal that cannot be injected into the given set. In the important special case where 𝑥 is an ordinal, this is the cardinal successor operation. Traditionally, the Hartogs number of a set is written ℵ(𝑋) and the cardinal successor 𝑋 +; we use functional notation for this, and cannot use the aleph symbol because it is taken for the enumerating function of the infinite initial ordinals df-aleph 9080. Some authors define the Hartogs number of a set to be the least *infinite* ordinal which does not inject into it, thus causing the range to consist only of alephs. We use the simpler definition where the value can be any successor cardinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ har = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥})
Definition	df-wdom 8734*	A set is weakly dominated by a "larger" set iff the "larger" set can be mapped onto the "smaller" set or the smaller set is empty; equivalently if the smaller set can be placed into bijection with some partition of the larger set. When choice is assumed (as fodom 9660), this coincides with the 1-1 definition df-dom 8225; however, it is not known whether this is a choice-equivalent or a strictly weaker form. Some discussion of this question can be found at http://boolesrings.org/asafk/2014/on-the-partition-principle/. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ≼* = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑦–onto→𝑥)}
Theorem	harf 8735	Functionality of the Hartogs function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ har:V⟶On
Theorem	harcl 8736	Closure of the Hartogs function in the ordinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (har‘𝑋) ∈ On
Theorem	harval 8737*	Function value of the Hartogs function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (har‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑋})
Theorem	elharval 8738	The Hartogs number of a set is greater than all ordinals which inject into it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (har‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ On ∧ 𝑌 ≼ 𝑋))
Theorem	harndom 8739	The Hartogs number of a set does not inject into that set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ¬ (har‘𝑋) ≼ 𝑋
Theorem	harword 8740	Weak ordering property of the Hartogs function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → (har‘𝑋) ⊆ (har‘𝑌))
Theorem	relwdom 8741	Weak dominance is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ Rel ≼*
Theorem	brwdom 8742*	Property of weak dominance (definitional form). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑌–onto→𝑋)))
Theorem	brwdomi 8743*	Property of weak dominance, forward direction only. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 → (𝑋 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑌–onto→𝑋))
Theorem	brwdomn0 8744*	Weak dominance over nonempty sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑌–onto→𝑋))
Theorem	0wdom 8745	Any set weakly dominates the empty set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼* 𝑋)
Theorem	fowdom 8746	An onto function implies weak dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝑌–onto→𝑋) → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑌)
Theorem	wdomref 8747	Reflexivity of weak dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑋)
Theorem	brwdom2 8748*	Alternate characterization of the weak dominance predicate which does not require special treatment of the empty set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑌∃𝑧 𝑧:𝑦–onto→𝑋))
Theorem	domwdom 8749	Weak dominance is implied by dominance in the usual sense. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑌)
Theorem	wdomtr 8750	Transitivity of weak dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≼* 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≼* 𝑍)
Theorem	wdomen1 8751	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and weak dominance. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≼* 𝐶))
Theorem	wdomen2 8752	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and weak dominance. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≼* 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≼* 𝐵))
Theorem	wdompwdom 8753	Weak dominance strengthens to usual dominance on the power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 → 𝒫 𝑋 ≼ 𝒫 𝑌)
Theorem	canthwdom 8754	Cantor's Theorem, stated using weak dominance (this is actually a stronger statement than canth2 8383, equivalent to canth 6864). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝐴 ≼* 𝐴
Theorem	wdom2d 8755*	Deduce weak dominance from an implicit onto function (stated in a way which avoids ax-rep 4995). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* 𝐵)
Theorem	wdomd 8756*	Deduce weak dominance from an implicit onto function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* 𝐵)
Theorem	brwdom3 8757*	Condition for weak dominance with a condition reminiscent of wdomd 8756. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑦)))
Theorem	brwdom3i 8758*	Weak dominance implies existence of a covering function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 → ∃𝑓∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑦))
Theorem	unwdomg 8759	Weak dominance of a (disjoint) union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≼* 𝐷 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ≼* (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷))
Theorem	xpwdomg 8760	Weak dominance of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 13-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≼* 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	wdomima2g 8761	A set is weakly dominant over its image under any function. This version of wdomimag 8762 is stated so as to avoid ax-rep 4995. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ≼* 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomimag 8762	A set is weakly dominant over its image under any function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ≼* 𝐴)
Theorem	unxpwdom2 8763	Lemma for unxpwdom 8764. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶))
Theorem	unxpwdom 8764	If a Cartesian product is dominated by a union, then the base set is either weakly dominated by one factor of the union or dominated by the other. Extracted from Lemma 2.3 of [KanamoriPincus] p. 420. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶))
Theorem	harwdom 8765	The Hartogs function is weakly dominated by 𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑋). This follows from a more precise analysis of the bound used in hartogs 8719 to prove that (har‘𝑋) is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (har‘𝑋) ≼* 𝒫 (𝑋 × 𝑋))
Theorem	ixpiunwdom 8766*	Describe an onto function from the indexed cartesian product to the indexed union. Together with ixpssmapg 8206 this shows that ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵 and X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵 have closely linked cardinalities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≼* (X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 × 𝐴))
2.5  ZF Set Theory - add the Axiom of Regularity
2.5.1  Introduce the Axiom of Regularity
Axiom	ax-reg 8767*	Axiom of Regularity. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Also called the Axiom of Foundation. A rather non-intuitive axiom that denies more than it asserts, it states (in the form of zfreg 8770) that every nonempty set contains a set disjoint from itself. One consequence is that it denies the existence of a set containing itself (elirrv 8771). A stronger version that works for proper classes is proved as zfregs 8886. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))
Theorem	axreg2 8768*	Axiom of Regularity expressed more compactly. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	zfregcl 8769*	The Axiom of Regularity with class variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1994.) Replace sethood hypothesis with sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	zfreg 8770*	The Axiom of Regularity using abbreviations. Axiom 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. This is called the "weak form". Axiom Reg of [BellMachover] p. 480. There is also a "strong form", not requiring that 𝐴 be a set, that can be proved with more difficulty (see zfregs 8886). (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1995.) Replace sethood hypothesis with sethood antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	elirrv 8771	The membership relation is irreflexive: no set is a member of itself. Theorem 105 of [Suppes] p. 54. (This is trivial to prove from zfregfr 8779 and efrirr 5324, but this proof is direct from the Axiom of Regularity.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	elirr 8772	No class is a member of itself. Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	elneq 8773	A class is not equal to any of its elements. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelaneq 8774	A class is not an element of and equal to a class at the same time. Variant of elneq 8773 analogously to elnotel 8783 and en2lp 8780. (Proposed by BJ, 18-Jun-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	epinid0 8775	The membership (epsilon) relation and the identity relation are disjoint. Variable-free version of nelaneq 8774. (Proposed by BJ, 18-Jun-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ( E ∩ I ) = ∅
Theorem	sucprcreg 8776	A class is equal to its successor iff it is a proper class (assuming the Axiom of Regularity). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ↔ suc 𝐴 = 𝐴)
Theorem	ruv 8777	The Russell class is equal to the universe V. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Oct-2008.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} = V
Theorem	ruALT 8778	Alternate proof of ru 3662, simplified using (indirectly) the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 8767. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Oct-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} ∉ V
Theorem	zfregfr 8779	The membership relation is well-founded on any class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1995.)
⊢ E Fr 𝐴
Theorem	en2lp 8780	No class has 2-cycle membership loops. Theorem 7X(b) of [Enderton] p. 206. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cnvepnep 8781	The membership (epsilon) relation and its converse are disjoint, i.e., E is an asymmetric relation. Variable-free version of en2lp 8780. (Proposed by BJ, 18-Jun-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (◡ E ∩ E ) = ∅
Theorem	epnsym 8782	The membership (epsilon) relation is not symmetric. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ◡ E ≠ E
Theorem	elnotel 8783	A class cannot be an element of one of its elements. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elnel 8784	A class cannot be an element of one of its elements. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∉ 𝐴)
Theorem	en3lplem1 8785*	Lemma for en3lp 8787. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∩ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	en3lplem2 8786*	Lemma for en3lp 8787. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝑥 ∩ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	en3lp 8787	No class has 3-cycle membership loops. This proof was automatically generated from the virtual deduction proof en3lpVD 39900 using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	preleqg 8788	Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. Closed form of preleq 8789. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	preleq 8789	Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	preleqALT 8790	Alternate proof of preleq 8789, not based on preleqg 8788: Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	opthreg 8791	Theorem for alternate representation of ordered pairs, requiring the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 8767 (via the preleq 8789 step). See df-op 4405 for a description of other ordered pair representations. Exercise 34 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	preleqOLD 8792	Obsolete version of preleqALT 8790 as of 15-Jun-2022. Hypotheses 𝐴 ∈ V and 𝐵 ∈ V are not needed! (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	opthregOLD 8793	Obsolete proof of opthreg 8791 as of 15-Jun-2022. Theorem for alternate representation of ordered pairs, requiring the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 8767 (via the preleqOLD 8792 step). See df-op 4405 for a description of other ordered pair representations. Exercise 34 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	suc11reg 8794	The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function (assuming the Axiom of Regularity). Exercise 35 of [Enderton] p. 208 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	dford2 8795*	Assuming ax-reg 8767, an ordinal is a transitive class on which inclusion satisfies trichotomy. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
2.5.2  Axiom of Infinity equivalents
Theorem	inf0 8796*	Our Axiom of Infinity derived from existence of omega. The proof shows that the especially contrived class "ran (rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑣), 𝑥) ↾ ω) " exists, is a subset of its union, and contains a given set 𝑥 (and thus is nonempty). Thus, it provides an example demonstrating that a set 𝑦 exists with the necessary properties demanded by ax-inf 8813. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1996.)
⊢ ω ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	inf1 8797	Variation of Axiom of Infinity (using zfinf 8814 as a hypothesis). Axiom of Infinity in [FreydScedrov] p. 283. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1996.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 1-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))
Theorem	inf2 8798*	Variation of Axiom of Infinity. There exists a nonempty set that is a subset of its union (using zfinf 8814 as a hypothesis). Abbreviated version of the Axiom of Infinity in [FreydScedrov] p. 283. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.)
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥)
Theorem	inf3lema 8799*	Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 8810 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	inf3lemb 8800*	Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 8810 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘∅) = ∅