Theorem fldextsubrg 33951

Description: Field extension implies a subring relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jul-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
fldextsubrg.1	⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fldextsubrg	⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))

Proof of Theorem fldextsubrg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fldextsubrg.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝑈 = (Base‘𝐹)
2		fldextfld1 33949	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐸 ∈ Field)
3		fldextfld2 33950	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝐹 ∈ Field)
4		brfldext 33947	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ Field ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Field) → (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (Base‘𝐹) ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))))
5	2, 3, 4	syl2anc 595	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 ↔ (𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (Base‘𝐹) ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))))
6	5	ibi 270	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (𝐹 = (𝐸 ↾s (Base‘𝐹)) ∧ (Base‘𝐹) ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸)))
7	6	simprd 500	. 2 ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → (Base‘𝐹) ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))
8	1, 7	eqeltrid 2869	1 ⊢ (𝐸/FldExt𝐹 → 𝑈 ∈ (SubRing‘𝐸))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1563   ∈ wcel 2145   class class class wbr 5104  ‘cfv 6525  (class class class)co 7400  Basecbs 17257   ↾_s cress 17278  SubRingcsubrg 20642  Fieldcfield 20802  /_FldExtcfldext 33940

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5250  ax-pr 5394

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1566  df-fal 1576  df-ex 1803  df-sb 2094  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3418  df-v 3459  df-dif 3910  df-un 3912  df-in 3914  df-ss 3924  df-nul 4289  df-if 4484  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-op 4592  df-uni 4868  df-br 5105  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5657  df-iota 6481  df-fv 6533  df-ov 7403  df-fldext 33943

This theorem is referenced by:  fldextsdrg  33956  fldextsralvec  33957  extdgcl  33958  extdggt0  33959  extdgmul  33965  extdg1id  33968  fldextchr  33971