Theorem preleqALT 9653

Description: Alternate proof of preleq 9652, not based on preleqg 9651: Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
preleq.b	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
preleqALT.d	⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
preleqALT	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem preleqALT

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		preleq.b	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
2	1	jctr 534	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
3		preleqALT.d	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V
4	3	jctr 534	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ V))
5		preq12bg 4811	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ V)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
6	2, 4, 5	syl2an 608	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))))
7	6	biimpa 482	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
8	7	ord 878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (¬ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
9		en2lp 9642	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
10		eleq12 2854	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐶))
11	10	anbi1d 643	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)))
12	9, 11	mtbiri 330	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶) → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷))
13	8, 12	syl6 36	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (¬ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)))
14	13	con4d 116	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
15	14	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))))
16	15	pm2.43a 55	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
17	16	imp 412	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454  {cpr 4590

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-pr 5396  ax-reg 9621

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-eprel 5556  df-fr 5609

This theorem is used by: (None)