![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
2 | vex 3466 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | tfrlem3a 8407 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
4 | 3 | eqabi 2862 | 1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 394 = wceq 1534 {cab 2703 ∀wral 3051 ∃wrex 3060 ↾ cres 5684 Oncon0 6376 Fn wfn 6549 ‘cfv 6554 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1790 ax-4 1804 ax-5 1906 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2004 ax-8 2101 ax-9 2109 ax-ext 2697 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-or 846 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1537 df-fal 1547 df-ex 1775 df-sb 2061 df-clab 2704 df-cleq 2718 df-clel 2803 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-rab 3420 df-v 3464 df-dif 3950 df-un 3952 df-in 3954 df-ss 3964 df-nul 4326 df-if 4534 df-sn 4634 df-pr 4636 df-op 4640 df-uni 4914 df-br 5154 df-opab 5216 df-xp 5688 df-rel 5689 df-cnv 5690 df-co 5691 df-dm 5692 df-res 5694 df-iota 6506 df-fun 6556 df-fn 6557 df-fv 6562 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem4 8409 tfrlem8 8414 rdglem1 8445 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |