![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
2 | vex 3448 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | tfrlem3a 8324 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
4 | 3 | abbi2i 2870 | 1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 397 = wceq 1542 {cab 2710 ∀wral 3061 ∃wrex 3070 ↾ cres 5636 Oncon0 6318 Fn wfn 6492 ‘cfv 6497 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-ext 2704 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-3an 1090 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1783 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-ral 3062 df-rex 3071 df-rab 3407 df-v 3446 df-dif 3914 df-un 3916 df-in 3918 df-ss 3928 df-nul 4284 df-if 4488 df-sn 4588 df-pr 4590 df-op 4594 df-uni 4867 df-br 5107 df-opab 5169 df-xp 5640 df-rel 5641 df-cnv 5642 df-co 5643 df-dm 5644 df-res 5646 df-iota 6449 df-fun 6499 df-fn 6500 df-fv 6505 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem4 8326 tfrlem8 8331 rdglem1 8362 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |