Theorem tfrlem3 8362

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔   𝑓,𝑔,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤, 𝑓)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
2		vex 3458	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 8361	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))
4	3	eqabi 2897	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569  {cab 2740  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088   ↾ cres 5662  Oncon0 6360   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-res 5672  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-fv 6544

This theorem is used by:  tfrlem4  8363  tfrlem8  8369  rdglem1  8400