![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
2 | vex 3476 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | tfrlem3a 8358 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
4 | 3 | eqabi 2868 | 1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 396 = wceq 1541 {cab 2708 ∀wral 3060 ∃wrex 3069 ↾ cres 5670 Oncon0 6352 Fn wfn 6526 ‘cfv 6531 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-ext 2702 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 846 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1782 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2709 df-cleq 2723 df-clel 2809 df-ral 3061 df-rex 3070 df-rab 3432 df-v 3474 df-dif 3946 df-un 3948 df-in 3950 df-ss 3960 df-nul 4318 df-if 4522 df-sn 4622 df-pr 4624 df-op 4628 df-uni 4901 df-br 5141 df-opab 5203 df-xp 5674 df-rel 5675 df-cnv 5676 df-co 5677 df-dm 5678 df-res 5680 df-iota 6483 df-fun 6533 df-fn 6534 df-fv 6539 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem4 8360 tfrlem8 8365 rdglem1 8396 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |