![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
2 | vex 3482 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | tfrlem3a 8416 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
4 | 3 | eqabi 2875 | 1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1537 {cab 2712 ∀wral 3059 ∃wrex 3068 ↾ cres 5691 Oncon0 6386 Fn wfn 6558 ‘cfv 6563 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-ext 2706 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1777 df-sb 2063 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2814 df-ral 3060 df-rex 3069 df-rab 3434 df-v 3480 df-dif 3966 df-un 3968 df-in 3970 df-ss 3980 df-nul 4340 df-if 4532 df-sn 4632 df-pr 4634 df-op 4638 df-uni 4913 df-br 5149 df-opab 5211 df-xp 5695 df-rel 5696 df-cnv 5697 df-co 5698 df-dm 5699 df-res 5701 df-iota 6516 df-fun 6565 df-fn 6566 df-fv 6571 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem4 8418 tfrlem8 8423 rdglem1 8454 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |