Theorem tfrlem3 8408

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔   𝑓,𝑔,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
2		vex 3466	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 8407	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))
4	3	eqabi 2862	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1534  {cab 2703  ∀wral 3051  ∃wrex 3060   ↾ cres 5684  Oncon0 6376   Fn wfn 6549  ‘cfv 6554

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-ext 2697

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2803  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3420  df-v 3464  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4326  df-if 4534  df-sn 4634  df-pr 4636  df-op 4640  df-uni 4914  df-br 5154  df-opab 5216  df-xp 5688  df-rel 5689  df-cnv 5690  df-co 5691  df-dm 5692  df-res 5694  df-iota 6506  df-fun 6556  df-fn 6557  df-fv 6562

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  8409  tfrlem8  8414  rdglem1  8445