![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
2 | vex 3388 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | tfrlem3a 7712 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
4 | 3 | abbi2i 2915 | 1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 385 = wceq 1653 {cab 2785 ∀wral 3089 ∃wrex 3090 ↾ cres 5314 Oncon0 5941 Fn wfn 6096 ‘cfv 6101 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1891 ax-4 1905 ax-5 2006 ax-6 2072 ax-7 2107 ax-9 2166 ax-10 2185 ax-11 2200 ax-12 2213 ax-13 2377 ax-ext 2777 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 199 df-an 386 df-or 875 df-3an 1110 df-tru 1657 df-ex 1876 df-nf 1880 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2786 df-cleq 2792 df-clel 2795 df-nfc 2930 df-ral 3094 df-rex 3095 df-rab 3098 df-v 3387 df-dif 3772 df-un 3774 df-in 3776 df-ss 3783 df-nul 4116 df-if 4278 df-sn 4369 df-pr 4371 df-op 4375 df-uni 4629 df-br 4844 df-opab 4906 df-xp 5318 df-rel 5319 df-cnv 5320 df-co 5321 df-dm 5322 df-res 5324 df-iota 6064 df-fun 6103 df-fn 6104 df-fv 6109 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem4 7714 tfrlem8 7719 rdglem1 7750 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |