Theorem tfrlem3 7713

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔   𝑓,𝑔,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
2		vex 3388	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 7712	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))
4	3	abbi2i 2915	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 385   = wceq 1653  {cab 2785  ∀wral 3089  ∃wrex 3090   ↾ cres 5314  Oncon0 5941   Fn wfn 6096  ‘cfv 6101

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1891  ax-4 1905  ax-5 2006  ax-6 2072  ax-7 2107  ax-9 2166  ax-10 2185  ax-11 2200  ax-12 2213  ax-13 2377  ax-ext 2777

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 386  df-or 875  df-3an 1110  df-tru 1657  df-ex 1876  df-nf 1880  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2786  df-cleq 2792  df-clel 2795  df-nfc 2930  df-ral 3094  df-rex 3095  df-rab 3098  df-v 3387  df-dif 3772  df-un 3774  df-in 3776  df-ss 3783  df-nul 4116  df-if 4278  df-sn 4369  df-pr 4371  df-op 4375  df-uni 4629  df-br 4844  df-opab 4906  df-xp 5318  df-rel 5319  df-cnv 5320  df-co 5321  df-dm 5322  df-res 5324  df-iota 6064  df-fun 6103  df-fn 6104  df-fv 6109

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  7714  tfrlem8  7719  rdglem1  7750