Theorem tfrlem3 8385

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔   𝑓,𝑔,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤, 𝑓)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
2		vex 3454	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 8384	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))
4	3	eqabi 2895	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  {cab 2738  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086   ↾ cres 5652  Oncon0 6362   Fn wfn 6533  ‘cfv 6538

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-res 5662  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-fv 6546

This theorem is used by:  tfrlem4  8386  tfrlem8  8392  rdglem1  8423