![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
2 | vex 3475 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | tfrlem3a 8402 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
4 | 3 | eqabi 2864 | 1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 394 = wceq 1533 {cab 2704 ∀wral 3057 ∃wrex 3066 ↾ cres 5682 Oncon0 6372 Fn wfn 6546 ‘cfv 6551 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1789 ax-4 1803 ax-5 1905 ax-6 1963 ax-7 2003 ax-8 2100 ax-9 2108 ax-ext 2698 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-or 846 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1536 df-fal 1546 df-ex 1774 df-sb 2060 df-clab 2705 df-cleq 2719 df-clel 2805 df-ral 3058 df-rex 3067 df-rab 3429 df-v 3473 df-dif 3950 df-un 3952 df-in 3954 df-ss 3964 df-nul 4325 df-if 4531 df-sn 4631 df-pr 4633 df-op 4637 df-uni 4911 df-br 5151 df-opab 5213 df-xp 5686 df-rel 5687 df-cnv 5688 df-co 5689 df-dm 5690 df-res 5692 df-iota 6503 df-fun 6553 df-fn 6554 df-fv 6559 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem4 8404 tfrlem8 8409 rdglem1 8440 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |