Theorem xpiindi 5822

Description: Distributive law for Cartesian product over indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpiindi	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem xpiindi

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relxp 5676	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
2	1	rgenw 3084	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
3		r19.2z 4458	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
4	2, 3	mpan2 704	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
5		reliin 5804	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵) → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
7		relxp 5676	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
8	6, 7	jctil 529	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
9		r19.28zv 4465	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
10	9	bicomd 226	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
11		eliin 4961	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
12	11	elv 3459	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
13	12	anbi2i 635	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
14		opelxp 5694	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
15	14	ralbii 3112	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
16	10, 13, 15	3bitr4g 317	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
17		opelxp 5694	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵))
18		opex 5439	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V
19		eliin 4961	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
20	18, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
21	16, 17, 20	3bitr4g 317	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
22	21	eqrelrdv2 5780	. 2 ⊢ (((Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
23	8, 22	mpancom 701	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  Vcvv 3454  ∅c0 4281  ⟨cop 4840  ∩ ciin 4957   × cxp 5656  Rel wrel 5663

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-iin 4959  df-opab 5174  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665

This theorem is used by:  xpriindi  5823