Theorem xpiindi 5823

Description: Distributive law for Cartesian product over indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpiindi	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem xpiindi

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relxp 5681	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
2	1	rgenw 3085	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
3		r19.2z 4462	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
4	2, 3	mpan2 704	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
5		reliin 5806	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵) → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
7		relxp 5681	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
8	6, 7	jctil 529	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
9		r19.28zv 4469	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
10	9	bicomd 226	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
11		eliin 4963	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
12	11	elv 3462	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
13	12	anbi2i 635	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
14		opelxp 5699	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
15	14	ralbii 3113	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
16	10, 13, 15	3bitr4g 317	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
17		opelxp 5699	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵))
18		opex 5447	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V
19		eliin 4963	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
20	18, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
21	16, 17, 20	3bitr4g 317	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
22	21	eqrelrdv2 5783	. 2 ⊢ (((Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
23	8, 22	mpancom 701	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960  ∀wral 3081  ∃wrex 3091  Vcvv 3457  ∅c0 4286  ⟨cop 4597  ∩ ciin 4959   × cxp 5661  Rel wrel 5668

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-iin 4961  df-opab 5176  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670

This theorem is used by:  xpriindi  5824