Theorem xpiindi 5489

Description: Distributive law for Cartesian product over indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpiindi	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem xpiindi

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relxp 5359	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
2	1	rgenw 3132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
3		r19.2z 4281	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
4	2, 3	mpan2 684	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
5		reliin 5474	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵) → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
7		relxp 5359	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
8	6, 7	jctil 517	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
9		r19.28zv 4287	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
10	9	bicomd 215	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
11		vex 3416	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
12		eliin 4744	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
14	13	anbi2i 618	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
15		opelxp 5377	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
16	15	ralbii 3188	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
17	10, 14, 16	3bitr4g 306	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
18		opelxp 5377	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵))
19		opex 5152	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V
20		eliin 4744	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
21	19, 20	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
22	17, 18, 21	3bitr4g 306	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
23	22	eqrelrdv2 5452	. 2 ⊢ (((Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
24	8, 23	mpancom 681	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 386   = wceq 1658   ∈ wcel 2166   ≠ wne 2998  ∀wral 3116  ∃wrex 3117  Vcvv 3413  ∅c0 4143  ⟨cop 4402  ∩ ciin 4740   × cxp 5339  Rel wrel 5346

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-13 2390  ax-ext 2802  ax-sep 5004  ax-nul 5012  ax-pr 5126

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2811  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2820  df-nfc 2957  df-ne 2999  df-ral 3121  df-rex 3122  df-rab 3125  df-v 3415  df-dif 3800  df-un 3802  df-in 3804  df-ss 3811  df-nul 4144  df-if 4306  df-sn 4397  df-pr 4399  df-op 4403  df-iin 4742  df-opab 4935  df-xp 5347  df-rel 5348

This theorem is referenced by:  xpriindi  5490