Theorem fvmptdf 5667

Description: Alternate deduction version of fvmpt 5656, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvmptdf.1	|- ( ph -> A e. D )
fvmptdf.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> B e. V )
fvmptdf.3	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B -> ps ) )
fvmptdf.4	|- F/_ x F
fvmptdf.5	|- F/ x ps

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvmptdf	|- ( ph -> ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, D   ph, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x)   B( x)   F( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem fvmptdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1551	. 2 |- F/ x ph
2		fvmptdf.4	. . . 4 |- F/_ x F
3		nfmpt1 4137	. . . 4 |- F/_ x ( x e. D |-> B )
4	2, 3	nfeq 2356	. . 3 |- F/ x F = ( x e. D |-> B )
5		fvmptdf.5	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
6	4, 5	nfim 1595	. 2 |- F/ x ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps )
7		fvmptdf.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> A e. D )
8		elex 2783	. . . 4 |- ( A e. D -> A e. _V )
9	7, 8	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A e. _V )
10		isset 2778	. . 3 |- ( A e. _V <-> E. x x = A )
11	9, 10	sylib 122	. 2 |- ( ph -> E. x x = A )
12		fveq1 5575	. . 3 |- ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ( F ` A ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) )
13		simpr 110	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> x = A )
14	13	fveq2d 5580	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` x ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) )
15	7	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> A e. D )
16	13, 15	eqeltrd 2282	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> x e. D )
17		fvmptdf.2	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> B e. V )
18		eqid 2205	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x e. D |-> B ) = ( x e. D |-> B )
19	18	fvmpt2 5663	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( x e. D /\ B e. V ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` x ) = B )
20	16, 17, 19	syl2anc 411	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` x ) = B )
21	14, 20	eqtr3d 2240	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) = B )
22	21	eqeq2d 2217	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) <-> ( F ` A ) = B ) )
23		fvmptdf.3	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B -> ps ) )
24	22, 23	sylbid 150	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) -> ps ) )
25	12, 24	syl5 32	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps ) )
26	1, 6, 11, 25	exlimdd 1895	1 |- ( ph -> ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   F/wnf 1483   E.wex 1515   e. wcel 2176   F/_wnfc 2335   _Vcvv 2772   |-> cmpt 4105   ` cfv 5271

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-14 2179  ax-ext 2187  ax-sep 4162  ax-pow 4218  ax-pr 4253

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-eu 2057  df-mo 2058  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ral 2489  df-rex 2490  df-v 2774  df-sbc 2999  df-csb 3094  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-pw 3618  df-sn 3639  df-pr 3640  df-op 3642  df-uni 3851  df-br 4045  df-opab 4106  df-mpt 4107  df-id 4340  df-xp 4681  df-rel 4682  df-cnv 4683  df-co 4684  df-dm 4685  df-iota 5232  df-fun 5273  df-fv 5279

This theorem is referenced by:  fvmptdv  5668