Theorem fvmptdf 5390

Description: Alternate deduction version of fvmpt 5381, suitable for iteration. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvmptdf.1	|- ( ph -> A e. D )
fvmptdf.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> B e. V )
fvmptdf.3	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B -> ps ) )
fvmptdf.4	|- F/_ x F
fvmptdf.5	|- F/ x ps

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvmptdf	|- ( ph -> ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, D   ph, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x)   B( x)   F( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem fvmptdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1466	. 2 |- F/ x ph
2		fvmptdf.4	. . . 4 |- F/_ x F
3		nfmpt1 3931	. . . 4 |- F/_ x ( x e. D |-> B )
4	2, 3	nfeq 2236	. . 3 |- F/ x F = ( x e. D |-> B )
5		fvmptdf.5	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
6	4, 5	nfim 1509	. 2 |- F/ x ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps )
7		fvmptdf.1	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> A e. D )
8		elex 2630	. . . 4 |- ( A e. D -> A e. _V )
9	7, 8	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A e. _V )
10		isset 2625	. . 3 |- ( A e. _V <-> E. x x = A )
11	9, 10	sylib 120	. 2 |- ( ph -> E. x x = A )
12		fveq1 5304	. . 3 |- ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ( F ` A ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) )
13		simpr 108	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> x = A )
14	13	fveq2d 5309	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` x ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) )
15	7	adantr 270	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> A e. D )
16	13, 15	eqeltrd 2164	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> x e. D )
17		fvmptdf.2	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> B e. V )
18		eqid 2088	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x e. D |-> B ) = ( x e. D |-> B )
19	18	fvmpt2 5386	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( x e. D /\ B e. V ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` x ) = B )
20	16, 17, 19	syl2anc 403	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` x ) = B )
21	14, 20	eqtr3d 2122	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) = B )
22	21	eqeq2d 2099	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) <-> ( F ` A ) = B ) )
23		fvmptdf.3	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = B -> ps ) )
24	22, 23	sylbid 148	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ( F ` A ) = ( ( x e. D |-> B ) ` A ) -> ps ) )
25	12, 24	syl5 32	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps ) )
26	1, 6, 11, 25	exlimdd 1800	1 |- ( ph -> ( F = ( x e. D |-> B ) -> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   = wceq 1289   F/wnf 1394   E.wex 1426   e. wcel 1438   F/_wnfc 2215   _Vcvv 2619   |-> cmpt 3899   ` cfv 5015

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-14 1450  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070  ax-sep 3957  ax-pow 4009  ax-pr 4036

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 926  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-eu 1951  df-mo 1952  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-ral 2364  df-rex 2365  df-v 2621  df-sbc 2841  df-csb 2934  df-un 3003  df-in 3005  df-ss 3012  df-pw 3431  df-sn 3452  df-pr 3453  df-op 3455  df-uni 3654  df-br 3846  df-opab 3900  df-mpt 3901  df-id 4120  df-xp 4444  df-rel 4445  df-cnv 4446  df-co 4447  df-dm 4448  df-iota 4980  df-fun 5017  df-fv 5023

This theorem is referenced by:  fvmptdv  5391