Theorem inopab 4679

Description: Intersection of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inopab	|- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)

Proof of Theorem inopab

Dummy variables w z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 4674	. . 3 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ph }
2		relin1 4665	. . 3 |- ( Rel { <. x , y >. | ph } -> Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } )
4		relopab 4674	. 2 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }
5		sban 1929	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
6		sban 1929	. . . . 5 |- ( [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
7	6	sbbii 1739	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
8		opelopabsbALT 4189	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph )
9		opelopabsbALT 4189	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps )
10	8, 9	anbi12i 456	. . . 4 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
11	5, 7, 10	3bitr4ri 212	. . 3 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
12		elin 3264	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
13		opelopabsbALT 4189	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
14	11, 12, 13	3bitr4i 211	. 2 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } )
15	3, 4, 14	eqrelriiv 4641	1 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1332   e. wcel 1481   [wsb 1736   i^i cin 3075   <.cop 3535   {copab 3996   Rel wrel 4552

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-sep 4054  ax-pow 4106  ax-pr 4139

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-v 2691  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-opab 3998  df-xp 4553  df-rel 4554

This theorem is referenced by:  inxp  4681  resopab  4871  cnvin  4954  fndmin  5535  enq0enq  7263