Theorem inopab 4794

Description: Intersection of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inopab	|- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)

Proof of Theorem inopab

Dummy variables w z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 4788	. . 3 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ph }
2		relin1 4777	. . 3 |- ( Rel { <. x , y >. | ph } -> Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } )
4		relopab 4788	. 2 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }
5		sban 1971	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
6		sban 1971	. . . . 5 |- ( [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
7	6	sbbii 1776	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
8		opelopabsbALT 4289	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph )
9		opelopabsbALT 4289	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps )
10	8, 9	anbi12i 460	. . . 4 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
11	5, 7, 10	3bitr4ri 213	. . 3 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
12		elin 3342	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
13		opelopabsbALT 4289	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
14	11, 12, 13	3bitr4i 212	. 2 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } )
15	3, 4, 14	eqrelriiv 4753	1 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1364   [wsb 1773   e. wcel 2164   i^i cin 3152   <.cop 3621   {copab 4089   Rel wrel 4664

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-v 2762  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-opab 4091  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666

This theorem is referenced by:  inxp  4796  resopab  4986  cnvin  5073  fndmin  5665  enq0enq  7491