Theorem inopab 4583

Description: Intersection of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inopab	|- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)

Proof of Theorem inopab

Dummy variables w z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 4579	. . 3 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ph }
2		relin1 4570	. . 3 |- ( Rel { <. x , y >. | ph } -> Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 7	. 2 |- Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } )
4		relopab 4579	. 2 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }
5		sban 1878	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
6		sban 1878	. . . . 5 |- ( [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
7	6	sbbii 1696	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
8		opelopabsbALT 4097	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph )
9		opelopabsbALT 4097	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps )
10	8, 9	anbi12i 449	. . . 4 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
11	5, 7, 10	3bitr4ri 212	. . 3 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
12		elin 3186	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
13		opelopabsbALT 4097	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
14	11, 12, 13	3bitr4i 211	. 2 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } )
15	3, 4, 14	eqrelriiv 4547	1 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1290   e. wcel 1439   [wsb 1693   i^i cin 3001   <.cop 3455   {copab 3906   Rel wrel 4459

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 666  ax-5 1382  ax-7 1383  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-10 1442  ax-11 1443  ax-i12 1444  ax-bndl 1445  ax-4 1446  ax-14 1451  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-i5r 1474  ax-ext 2071  ax-sep 3965  ax-pow 4017  ax-pr 4047

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 927  df-tru 1293  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-nfc 2218  df-ral 2365  df-rex 2366  df-v 2624  df-un 3006  df-in 3008  df-ss 3015  df-pw 3437  df-sn 3458  df-pr 3459  df-op 3461  df-opab 3908  df-xp 4460  df-rel 4461

This theorem is referenced by:  inxp  4585  resopab  4771  cnvin  4854  fndmin  5422  enq0enq  7053