Theorem inopab 4761

Description: Intersection of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inopab	|- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Distinct variable group:   x, y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   ps( x, y)

Proof of Theorem inopab

Dummy variables w z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 4755	. . 3 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ph }
2		relin1 4746	. . 3 |- ( Rel { <. x , y >. | ph } -> Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. 2 |- Rel ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } )
4		relopab 4755	. 2 |- Rel { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }
5		sban 1955	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
6		sban 1955	. . . . 5 |- ( [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
7	6	sbbii 1765	. . . 4 |- ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> [ w / y ] ( [ z / x ] ph /\ [ z / x ] ps ) )
8		opelopabsbALT 4261	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph )
9		opelopabsbALT 4261	. . . . 5 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps )
10	8, 9	anbi12i 460	. . . 4 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ph /\ [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ps ) )
11	5, 7, 10	3bitr4ri 213	. . 3 |- ( ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
12		elin 3320	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ph } /\ <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ps } ) )
13		opelopabsbALT 4261	. . 3 |- ( <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } <-> [ w / y ] [ z / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) )
14	11, 12, 13	3bitr4i 212	. 2 |- ( <. z , w >. e. ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) <-> <. z , w >. e. { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) } )
15	3, 4, 14	eqrelriiv 4722	1 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } i^i { <. x , y >. | ps } ) = { <. x , y >. | ( ph /\ ps ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1353   [wsb 1762   e. wcel 2148   i^i cin 3130   <.cop 3597   {copab 4065   Rel wrel 4633

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4123  ax-pow 4176  ax-pr 4211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-v 2741  df-un 3135  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144  df-pw 3579  df-sn 3600  df-pr 3601  df-op 3603  df-opab 4067  df-xp 4634  df-rel 4635

This theorem is referenced by:  inxp  4763  resopab  4953  cnvin  5038  fndmin  5625  enq0enq  7432