P. 48 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4701-4800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	peano4 4701	Two natural numbers are equal iff their successors are equal, i.e. the successor function is one-to-one. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. om ) -> ( suc A = suc B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	peano5 4702*	The induction postulate: any class containing zero and closed under the successor operation contains all natural numbers. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The more traditional statement of mathematical induction as a theorem schema, with a basis and an induction step, is derived from this theorem as Theorem findes 4707. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( (/) e. A /\ A. x e. om ( x e. A -> suc x e. A ) ) -> om C_ A )
2.6.4  Finite induction (for finite ordinals)
Theorem	find 4703*	The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-2001. The hypothesis states that A is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to A, and given any member of A the member's successor also belongs to A. The conclusion is that every natural number is in A. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|- ( A C_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A. x e. A suc x e. A )   =>    |- A = om
Theorem	finds 4704*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ta ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. om -> ta )
Theorem	finds2 4705*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ta -> ps )   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ta -> ( ch -> th ) ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ( ta -> ph ) )
Theorem	finds1 4706*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2006.)
|- ( x = (/) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = suc y -> ( ph <-> th ) )   &    |- ps   &    |- ( y e. om -> ( ch -> th ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ph )
Theorem	findes 4707	Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
|- [. (/) / x ]. ph   &    |- ( x e. om -> ( ph -> [. suc x / x ]. ph ) )   =>    |- ( x e. om -> ph )
2.6.5  The Natural Numbers (continued)
Theorem	nn0suc 4708*	A natural number is either 0 or a successor. Similar theorems for arbitrary sets or real numbers will not be provable (without the law of the excluded middle), but equality of natural numbers is decidable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ E. x e. om A = suc x ) )
Theorem	elomssom 4709	A natural number ordinal is, as a set, included in the set of natural number ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) Extract this result from the previous proof of elnn 4710. (Revised by BJ, 7-Aug-2024.)
|- ( A e. om -> A C_ om )
Theorem	elnn 4710	A member of a natural number is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ B e. om ) -> A e. om )
Theorem	ordom 4711	Omega is ordinal. Theorem 7.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.)
|- Ord om
Theorem	omelon2 4712	Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.)
|- ( om e. _V -> om e. On )
Theorem	omelon 4713	Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.)
|- om e. On
Theorem	nnon 4714	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. om -> A e. On )
Theorem	nnoni 4715	A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. om   =>    |- A e. On
Theorem	nnord 4716	A natural number is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1995.)
|- ( A e. om -> Ord A )
Theorem	omsson 4717	Omega is a subset of On. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
|- om C_ On
Theorem	limom 4718	Omega is a limit ordinal. Theorem 2.8 of [BellMachover] p. 473. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1995.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.)
|- Lim om
Theorem	peano2b 4719	A class belongs to omega iff its successor does. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-1995.)
|- ( A e. om <-> suc A e. om )
Theorem	nnsuc 4720*	A nonzero natural number is a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> E. x e. om A = suc x )
Theorem	nnsucpred 4721	The successor of the precedessor of a nonzero natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> suc U. A = A )
Theorem	nndceq0 4722	A natural number is either zero or nonzero. Decidable equality for natural numbers is a special case of the law of the excluded middle which holds in most constructive set theories including ours. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> DECID A = (/) )
Theorem	0elnn 4723	A natural number is either the empty set or has the empty set as an element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( A = (/) \/ (/) e. A ) )
Theorem	nn0eln0 4724	A natural number is nonempty iff it contains the empty set. Although in constructive mathematics it is generally more natural to work with inhabited sets and ignore the whole concept of nonempty sets, in the specific case of natural numbers this theorem may be helpful in converting proofs which were written assuming excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. om -> ( (/) e. A <-> A =/= (/) ) )
Theorem	nnregexmid 4725*	If inhabited sets of natural numbers always have minimal elements, excluded middle follows. The argument is essentially the same as regexmid 4639 and the larger lesson is that although natural numbers may behave "non-constructively" even in a constructive set theory (for example see nndceq 6710 or nntri3or 6704), sets of natural numbers are a different animal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2019.)
|- ( ( x C_ om /\ E. y y e. x ) -> E. y ( y e. x /\ A. z ( z e. y -> -. z e. x ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
Theorem	omsinds 4726*	Strong (or "total") induction principle over om. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x e. om -> ( A. y e. x ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- ( A e. om -> ch )
Theorem	nnpredcl 4727	The predecessor of a natural number is a natural number. This theorem is most interesting when the natural number is a successor (as seen in theorems like onsucuni2 4668) but also holds when it is (/) by uni0 3925. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A e. om -> U. A e. om )
Theorem	nnpredlt 4728	The predecessor (see nnpredcl 4727) of a nonzero natural number is less than (see df-iord 4469) that number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2024.)
|- ( ( A e. om /\ A =/= (/) ) -> U. A e. A )
2.6.6  Relations
Syntax	cxp 4729	Extend the definition of a class to include the cross product.
class ( A X. B )
Syntax	ccnv 4730	Extend the definition of a class to include the converse of a class.
class `' A
Syntax	cdm 4731	Extend the definition of a class to include the domain of a class.
class dom A
Syntax	crn 4732	Extend the definition of a class to include the range of a class.
class ran A
Syntax	cres 4733	Extend the definition of a class to include the restriction of a class. (Read: The restriction of A to B.)
class ( A |` B )
Syntax	cima 4734	Extend the definition of a class to include the image of a class. (Read: The image of B under A.)
class ( A " B )
Syntax	ccom 4735	Extend the definition of a class to include the composition of two classes. (Read: The composition of A and B.)
class ( A o. B )
Syntax	wrel 4736	Extend the definition of a wff to include the relation predicate. (Read: A is a relation.)
wff Rel A
Definition	df-xp 4737*	Define the Cartesian product of two classes. This is also sometimes called the "cross product" but that term also has other meanings; we intentionally choose a less ambiguous term. Definition 9.11 of [Quine] p. 64. For example, ( { 1 , 5 } X. { 2 , 7 } ) = ( { <. 1 , 2 >. , <. 1 , 7 >. } u. { <. 5 , 2 >. , <. 5 , 7 >. } ). Another example is that the set of rational numbers is defined using the Cartesian product as ( ZZ X. NN ); the left- and right-hand sides of the Cartesian product represent the top (integer) and bottom (natural) numbers of a fraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) }
Definition	df-rel 4738	Define the relation predicate. Definition 6.4(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. For alternate definitions, see dfrel2 5194 and dfrel3 5201. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ( Rel A <-> A C_ ( _V X. _V ) )
Definition	df-cnv 4739*	Define the converse of a class. Definition 9.12 of [Quine] p. 64. The converse of a binary relation swaps its arguments, i.e., if A e. _V and B e. _V then ( A `' R B <-> B R A ), as proven in brcnv 4919 (see df-br 4094 and df-rel 4738 for more on relations). For example, `' { <. 2 , 6 >. , <. 3 , 9 >. } = { <. 6 , 2 >. , <. 9 , 3 >. }. We use Quine's breve accent (smile) notation. Like Quine, we use it as a prefix, which eliminates the need for parentheses. "Converse" is Quine's terminology. Some authors use a "minus one" exponent and call it "inverse", especially when the argument is a function, although this is not in general a genuine inverse. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- `' A = { <. x , y >. | y A x }
Definition	df-co 4740*	Define the composition of two classes. Definition 6.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. Note that Definition 7 of [Suppes] p. 63 reverses A and B, uses a slash instead of o., and calls the operation "relative product". (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A o. B ) = { <. x , y >. | E. z ( x B z /\ z A y ) }
Definition	df-dm 4741*	Define the domain of a class. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 59. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } -> dom F = { 2 , 3 } . Contrast with range (defined in df-rn 4742). For alternate definitions see dfdm2 5278, dfdm3 4923, and dfdm4 4929. The notation " dom " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script D. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- dom A = { x | E. y x A y }
Definition	df-rn 4742	Define the range of a class. For example, F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } -> ran F = { 6 , 9 } . Contrast with domain (defined in df-dm 4741). For alternate definitions, see dfrn2 4924, dfrn3 4925, and dfrn4 5204. The notation " ran " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script R or script W. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- ran A = dom `' A
Definition	df-res 4743	Define the restriction of a class. Definition 6.6(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, ( F = { <. 2 , 6 >. , <. 3 , 9 >. } /\ B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F |` B ) = { <. 2 , 6 >. }. We do not introduce a special syntax for the corestriction of a class: it will be expressed either as the intersection ( A i^i ( _V X. B ) ) or as the converse of the restricted converse. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A |` B ) = ( A i^i ( B X. _V ) )
Definition	df-ima 4744	Define the image of a class (as restricted by another class). Definition 6.6(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, ( F = { <. 2 , 6 >., <. 3 , 9 >. } /\ B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F " B ) = { 6 } . Contrast with restriction (df-res 4743) and range (df-rn 4742). For an alternate definition, see dfima2 5084. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
|- ( A " B ) = ran ( A |` B )
Theorem	xpeq1 4745	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpeq2 4746	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( C X. A ) = ( C X. B ) )
Theorem	elxpi 4747*	Membership in a cross product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 4748. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp 4748*	Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp2 4749*	Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> E. x e. B E. y e. C A = <. x , y >. )
Theorem	xpeq12 4750	Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
|- ( ( A = B /\ C = D ) -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. D ) )
Theorem	xpeq1i 4751	Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A X. C ) = ( B X. C )
Theorem	xpeq2i 4752	Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( C X. A ) = ( C X. B )
Theorem	xpeq12i 4753	Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- ( A X. C ) = ( B X. D )
Theorem	xpeq1d 4754	Equality deduction for cross product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpeq2d 4755	Equality deduction for cross product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( C X. A ) = ( C X. B ) )
Theorem	xpeq12d 4756	Equality deduction for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A X. C ) = ( B X. D ) )
Theorem	sqxpeqd 4757	Equality deduction for a Cartesian square, see Wikipedia "Cartesian product", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_product#n-ary_Cartesian_power. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A X. A ) = ( B X. B ) )
Theorem	nfxp 4758	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x ( A X. B )
Theorem	0nelxp 4759	The empty set is not a member of a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- -. (/) e. ( A X. B )
Theorem	0nelelxp 4760	A member of a cross product (ordered pair) doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.)
|- ( C e. ( A X. B ) -> -. (/) e. C )
Theorem	opelxp 4761	Ordered pair membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) <-> ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) )
Theorem	brxp 4762	Binary relation on a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A ( C X. D ) B <-> ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) )
Theorem	opelxpi 4763	Ordered pair membership in a cross product (implication). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) )
Theorem	opelxpd 4764	Ordered pair membership in a Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. D )   =>    |- ( ph -> <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) )
Theorem	opelxp1 4765	The first member of an ordered pair of classes in a cross product belongs to first cross product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) -> A e. C )
Theorem	opelxp2 4766	The second member of an ordered pair of classes in a cross product belongs to second cross product argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( <. A , B >. e. ( C X. D ) -> B e. D )
Theorem	otelxp1 4767	The first member of an ordered triple of classes in a cross product belongs to first cross product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.)
|- ( <. <. A , B >. , C >. e. ( ( R X. S ) X. T ) -> A e. R )
Theorem	opabssxpd 4768*	An ordered-pair class abstraction is a subset of a Cartesian product. Formerly part of proof for opabex2 6366. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> x e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> y e. B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ps } C_ ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	rabxp 4769*	Membership in a class builder restricted to a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2014.)
|- ( x = <. y , z >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x e. ( A X. B ) | ph } = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. A /\ z e. B /\ ps ) }
Theorem	brrelex12 4770	A true binary relation on a relation implies the arguments are sets. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	brrelex1 4771	A true binary relation on a relation implies the first argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex 4772	A true binary relation on a relation implies the first argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex2 4773	A true binary relation on a relation implies the second argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A R B ) -> B e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex12i 4774	Two classes that are related by a binary relation are sets. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2022.)
|- Rel R   =>    |- ( A R B -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	brrelex1i 4775	The first argument of a binary relation exists. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.)
|- Rel R   =>    |- ( A R B -> A e. _V )
Theorem	brrelex2i 4776	The second argument of a binary relation exists. (An artifact of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- Rel R   =>    |- ( A R B -> B e. _V )
Theorem	nprrel 4777	No proper class is related to anything via any relation. (Contributed by Roy F. Longton, 30-Jul-2005.)
|- Rel R   &    |- -. A e. _V   =>    |- -. A R B
Theorem	0nelrel 4778	A binary relation does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Nov-2021.)
|- ( Rel R -> (/) e/ R )
Theorem	fconstmpt 4779*	Representation of a constant function using the mapping operation. (Note that x cannot appear free in B.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A X. { B } ) = ( x e. A |-> B )
Theorem	vtoclr 4780*	Variable to class conversion of transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- Rel R   &    |- ( ( x R y /\ y R z ) -> x R z )   =>    |- ( ( A R B /\ B R C ) -> A R C )
Theorem	opelvvg 4781	Ordered pair membership in the universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> <. A , B >. e. ( _V X. _V ) )
Theorem	opelvv 4782	Ordered pair membership in the universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- <. A , B >. e. ( _V X. _V )
Theorem	opthprc 4783	Justification theorem for an ordered pair definition that works for any classes, including proper classes. This is a possible definition implied by the footnote in [Jech] p. 78, which says, "The sophisticated reader will not object to our use of a pair of classes." (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2003.)
|- ( ( ( A X. { (/) } ) u. ( B X. { { (/) } } ) ) = ( ( C X. { (/) } ) u. ( D X. { { (/) } } ) ) <-> ( A = C /\ B = D ) )
Theorem	brel 4784	Two things in a binary relation belong to the relation's domain. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- R C_ ( C X. D )   =>    |- ( A R B -> ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) )
Theorem	brab2a 4785*	Ordered pair membership in an ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Nov-2015.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- R = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- ( A R B <-> ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) /\ ps ) )
Theorem	elxp3 4786*	Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-1995.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> E. x E. y ( <. x , y >. = A /\ <. x , y >. e. ( B X. C ) ) )
Theorem	opeliunxp 4787	Membership in a union of cross products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jan-2017.)
|- ( <. x , C >. e. U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ C e. B ) )
Theorem	xpundi 4788	Distributive law for cross product over union. Theorem 103 of [Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.)
|- ( A X. ( B u. C ) ) = ( ( A X. B ) u. ( A X. C ) )
Theorem	xpundir 4789	Distributive law for cross product over union. Similar to Theorem 103 of [Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
|- ( ( A u. B ) X. C ) = ( ( A X. C ) u. ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	xpiundi 4790*	Distributive law for cross product over indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
|- ( C X. U_ x e. A B ) = U_ x e. A ( C X. B )
Theorem	xpiundir 4791*	Distributive law for cross product over indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
|- ( U_ x e. A B X. C ) = U_ x e. A ( B X. C )
Theorem	iunxpconst 4792*	Membership in a union of cross products when the second factor is constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) = ( A X. B )
Theorem	xpun 4793	The cross product of two unions. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.)
|- ( ( A u. B ) X. ( C u. D ) ) = ( ( ( A X. C ) u. ( A X. D ) ) u. ( ( B X. C ) u. ( B X. D ) ) )
Theorem	elvv 4794*	Membership in universal class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) <-> E. x E. y A = <. x , y >. )
Theorem	elvvv 4795*	Membership in universal class of ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
|- ( A e. ( ( _V X. _V ) X. _V ) <-> E. x E. y E. z A = <. <. x , y >. , z >. )
Theorem	elvvuni 4796	An ordered pair contains its union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> U. A e. A )
Theorem	mosubopt 4797*	"At most one" remains true inside ordered pair quantification. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2007.)
|- ( A. y A. z E* x ph -> E* x E. y E. z ( A = <. y , z >. /\ ph ) )
Theorem	mosubop 4798*	"At most one" remains true inside ordered pair quantification. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
|- E* x ph   =>    |- E* x E. y E. z ( A = <. y , z >. /\ ph )
Theorem	brinxp2 4799	Intersection of binary relation with Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ( R i^i ( C X. D ) ) B <-> ( A e. C /\ B e. D /\ A R B ) )
Theorem	brinxp 4800	Intersection of binary relation with Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A R B <-> A ( R i^i ( C X. D ) ) B ) )