Theorem isarep2 5275

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature " [ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5273. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	|- A e. _V
isarep2.2	|- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	|- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Distinct variable groups:   x, w, y, A   y, z   ph, w   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   A( z)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 4917	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )
2		resopab 4928	. . . . 5 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
3	2	imaeq1i 4943	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2188	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
5		funopab 5223	. . . . 5 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } <-> A. x E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )
7	6	rspec 2518	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x e. A -> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
8		nfv 1516	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ z ph
9	8	mo3 2068	. . . . . . 7 |- ( E* y ph <-> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
10	7, 9	sylibr 133	. . . . . 6 |- ( x e. A -> E* y ph )
11		moanimv 2089	. . . . . 6 |- ( E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( x e. A -> E* y ph ) )
12	10, 11	mpbir 145	. . . . 5 |- E* y ( x e. A /\ ph )
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1441	. . . 4 |- Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 |- A e. _V
15	14	funimaex 5273	. . . 4 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } -> ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V )
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2239	. 2 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) e. _V
18	17	isseti 2734	1 |- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   A.wal 1341   = wceq 1343   E.wex 1480   [wsb 1750   E*wmo 2015   e. wcel 2136   A.wral 2444   _Vcvv 2726   {copab 4042   |` cres 4606   "cima 4607   Fun wfun 5182

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-coll 4097  ax-sep 4100  ax-pow 4153  ax-pr 4187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-eu 2017  df-mo 2018  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-v 2728  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585  df-br 3983  df-opab 4044  df-id 4271  df-xp 4610  df-rel 4611  df-cnv 4612  df-co 4613  df-dm 4614  df-rn 4615  df-res 4616  df-ima 4617  df-fun 5190

This theorem is referenced by: (None)