Theorem isarep2 5285

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature " [ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5283. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	|- A e. _V
isarep2.2	|- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	|- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Distinct variable groups:   x, w, y, A   y, z   ph, w   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   A( z)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 4924	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )
2		resopab 4935	. . . . 5 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
3	2	imaeq1i 4950	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2193	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
5		funopab 5233	. . . . 5 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } <-> A. x E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )
7	6	rspec 2522	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x e. A -> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
8		nfv 1521	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ z ph
9	8	mo3 2073	. . . . . . 7 |- ( E* y ph <-> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
10	7, 9	sylibr 133	. . . . . 6 |- ( x e. A -> E* y ph )
11		moanimv 2094	. . . . . 6 |- ( E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( x e. A -> E* y ph ) )
12	10, 11	mpbir 145	. . . . 5 |- E* y ( x e. A /\ ph )
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1446	. . . 4 |- Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 |- A e. _V
15	14	funimaex 5283	. . . 4 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } -> ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V )
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2243	. 2 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) e. _V
18	17	isseti 2738	1 |- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   A.wal 1346   = wceq 1348   E.wex 1485   [wsb 1755   E*wmo 2020   e. wcel 2141   A.wral 2448   _Vcvv 2730   {copab 4049   |` cres 4613   "cima 4614   Fun wfun 5192

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-14 2144  ax-ext 2152  ax-coll 4104  ax-sep 4107  ax-pow 4160  ax-pr 4194

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 975  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-eu 2022  df-mo 2023  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-ral 2453  df-rex 2454  df-v 2732  df-un 3125  df-in 3127  df-ss 3134  df-pw 3568  df-sn 3589  df-pr 3590  df-op 3592  df-br 3990  df-opab 4051  df-id 4278  df-xp 4617  df-rel 4618  df-cnv 4619  df-co 4620  df-dm 4621  df-rn 4622  df-res 4623  df-ima 4624  df-fun 5200

This theorem is referenced by: (None)