Theorem isarep2 5361

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature " [ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5359. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	|- A e. _V
isarep2.2	|- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	|- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Distinct variable groups:   x, w, y, A   y, z   ph, w   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   A( z)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 4992	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )
2		resopab 5003	. . . . 5 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
3	2	imaeq1i 5019	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2228	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
5		funopab 5306	. . . . 5 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } <-> A. x E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )
7	6	rspec 2558	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x e. A -> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
8		nfv 1551	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ z ph
9	8	mo3 2108	. . . . . . 7 |- ( E* y ph <-> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
10	7, 9	sylibr 134	. . . . . 6 |- ( x e. A -> E* y ph )
11		moanimv 2129	. . . . . 6 |- ( E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( x e. A -> E* y ph ) )
12	10, 11	mpbir 146	. . . . 5 |- E* y ( x e. A /\ ph )
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1476	. . . 4 |- Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 |- A e. _V
15	14	funimaex 5359	. . . 4 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } -> ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V )
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2278	. 2 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) e. _V
18	17	isseti 2780	1 |- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1371   = wceq 1373   E.wex 1515   [wsb 1785   E*wmo 2055   e. wcel 2176   A.wral 2484   _Vcvv 2772   {copab 4104   |` cres 4677   "cima 4678   Fun wfun 5265

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-14 2179  ax-ext 2187  ax-coll 4159  ax-sep 4162  ax-pow 4218  ax-pr 4253

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-eu 2057  df-mo 2058  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ral 2489  df-rex 2490  df-v 2774  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-pw 3618  df-sn 3639  df-pr 3640  df-op 3642  df-br 4045  df-opab 4106  df-id 4340  df-xp 4681  df-rel 4682  df-cnv 4683  df-co 4684  df-dm 4685  df-rn 4686  df-res 4687  df-ima 4688  df-fun 5273

This theorem is referenced by: (None)