Theorem isarep2 5380

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature " [ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5378. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	|- A e. _V
isarep2.2	|- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	|- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Distinct variable groups:   x, w, y, A   y, z   ph, w   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   A( z)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 5011	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )
2		resopab 5022	. . . . 5 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) = { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
3	2	imaeq1i 5038	. . . 4 |- ( ( { <. x , y >. | ph } |` A ) " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2230	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) = ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A )
5		funopab 5325	. . . . 5 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } <-> A. x E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- A. x e. A A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z )
7	6	rspec 2560	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x e. A -> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
8		nfv 1552	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ z ph
9	8	mo3 2110	. . . . . . 7 |- ( E* y ph <-> A. y A. z ( ( ph /\ [ z / y ] ph ) -> y = z ) )
10	7, 9	sylibr 134	. . . . . 6 |- ( x e. A -> E* y ph )
11		moanimv 2131	. . . . . 6 |- ( E* y ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( x e. A -> E* y ph ) )
12	10, 11	mpbir 146	. . . . 5 |- E* y ( x e. A /\ ph )
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1477	. . . 4 |- Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 |- A e. _V
15	14	funimaex 5378	. . . 4 |- ( Fun { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } -> ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V )
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } " A ) e. _V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2280	. 2 |- ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A ) e. _V
18	17	isseti 2785	1 |- E. w w = ( { <. x , y >. | ph } " A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   A.wal 1371   = wceq 1373   E.wex 1516   [wsb 1786   E*wmo 2056   e. wcel 2178   A.wral 2486   _Vcvv 2776   {copab 4120   |` cres 4695   "cima 4696   Fun wfun 5284

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-coll 4175  ax-sep 4178  ax-pow 4234  ax-pr 4269

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-v 2778  df-un 3178  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187  df-pw 3628  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-op 3652  df-br 4060  df-opab 4122  df-id 4358  df-xp 4699  df-rel 4700  df-cnv 4701  df-co 4702  df-dm 4703  df-rn 4704  df-res 4705  df-ima 4706  df-fun 5292

This theorem is referenced by: (None)