Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  isarep2 GIF version

Theorem isarep2 5205
 Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5203. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
isarep2.1 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2 𝑥𝐴𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Assertion
Ref Expression
isarep2 𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resima 4847 . . . 4 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2 resopab 4858 . . . . 5 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
32imaeq1i 4873 . . . 4 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
41, 3eqtr3i 2160 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5 funopab 5153 . . . . 5 (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑))
6 isarep2.2 . . . . . . . 8 𝑥𝐴𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
76rspec 2482 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥𝐴 → ∀𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8 nfv 1508 . . . . . . . 8 𝑧𝜑
98mo3 2051 . . . . . . 7 (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
107, 9sylibr 133 . . . . . 6 (𝑥𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11 moanimv 2072 . . . . . 6 (∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
1210, 11mpbir 145 . . . . 5 ∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑)
135, 12mpgbir 1429 . . . 4 Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
14 isarep2.1 . . . . 5 𝐴 ∈ V
1514funimaex 5203 . . . 4 (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
1613, 15ax-mp 5 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
174, 16eqeltri 2210 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
1817isseti 2689 1 𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468   ∈ wcel 1480  [wsb 1735  ∃*wmo 1998  ∀wral 2414  Vcvv 2681  {copab 3983   ↾ cres 4536   “ cima 4537  Fun wfun 5112 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-coll 4038  ax-sep 4041  ax-pow 4093  ax-pr 4126 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ral 2419  df-rex 2420  df-v 2683  df-un 3070  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-pw 3507  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-br 3925  df-opab 3985  df-id 4210  df-xp 4540  df-rel 4541  df-cnv 4542  df-co 4543  df-dm 4544  df-rn 4545  df-res 4546  df-ima 4547  df-fun 5120 This theorem is referenced by: (None)
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator