ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  isarep2 GIF version

Theorem isarep2 5259
Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5257. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
isarep2.1 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2 𝑥𝐴𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Assertion
Ref Expression
isarep2 𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resima 4901 . . . 4 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2 resopab 4912 . . . . 5 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
32imaeq1i 4927 . . . 4 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
41, 3eqtr3i 2180 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5 funopab 5207 . . . . 5 (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑))
6 isarep2.2 . . . . . . . 8 𝑥𝐴𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
76rspec 2509 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥𝐴 → ∀𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8 nfv 1508 . . . . . . . 8 𝑧𝜑
98mo3 2060 . . . . . . 7 (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
107, 9sylibr 133 . . . . . 6 (𝑥𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11 moanimv 2081 . . . . . 6 (∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
1210, 11mpbir 145 . . . . 5 ∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑)
135, 12mpgbir 1433 . . . 4 Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
14 isarep2.1 . . . . 5 𝐴 ∈ V
1514funimaex 5257 . . . 4 (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
1613, 15ax-mp 5 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
174, 16eqeltri 2230 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
1817isseti 2720 1 𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 103  wal 1333   = wceq 1335  wex 1472  [wsb 1742  ∃*wmo 2007  wcel 2128  wral 2435  Vcvv 2712  {copab 4026  cres 4590  cima 4591  Fun wfun 5166
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-14 2131  ax-ext 2139  ax-coll 4081  ax-sep 4084  ax-pow 4137  ax-pr 4171
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1338  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-eu 2009  df-mo 2010  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-ral 2440  df-rex 2441  df-v 2714  df-un 3106  df-in 3108  df-ss 3115  df-pw 3546  df-sn 3567  df-pr 3568  df-op 3570  df-br 3968  df-opab 4028  df-id 4255  df-xp 4594  df-rel 4595  df-cnv 4596  df-co 4597  df-dm 4598  df-rn 4599  df-res 4600  df-ima 4601  df-fun 5174
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator